Climate Change, Energy Security, and Nuclear Power. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nuclear power plants are a poor choice for addressing energy challenges in a carbon-constrained, post-Kyoto world. Nuclear generators are prone to insolvable infrastructural, economic, social, and environmental problems. They face immense capital costs, rising uranium fuel prices, significant lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, and irresolvable problems with reactor safety, waste storage, weapons proliferation, and vulnerability to attack. Renewable power generators, in contrast, reduce dependence on foreign sources of uranium and decentralize electricity supply so that an accidental or intentional outage would have a more limited impact than the outage of larger nuclear facilities. Most significantly, renewable power technologies have environmental benefits because they create power without relying on the extraction of uranium and its associated digging, drilling, mining, transporting, enrichment, and storage. As a result, renewable energy technologies provide a much greater potential for substantial carbon emissions reductions than significant investments in new nuclear power generation.
THE NUCLEAR POWER CHALLENGES, OR THE CHALLENGE OF A CONTROVERSY
Nuclear energy is a promising sustainable energy source that can significantly meet the world's increasing energy demands while reducing carbon emissions. Unlike fossil fuels, nuclear power does not release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, making it an ideal solution for countries striving to meet climate goals. Furthermore, nuclear energy can provide a stable and reliable energy source, which is critical for developing countries seeking to increase their energy independence and promote economic growth. Nuclear energy is still debatable, despite its advantages, because of worries about safety, the disposal of radioactive waste, and the possibility of the spread of nuclear weapons. Developing nations, in particular, have considerable difficulties implementing nuclear energy because of their lack of resources, inexperience, and unstable political environments. Therefore, while thinking about nuclear energy as a potential source of sustainable energy in underdeveloped nations, it is imperative to give safety, transparency, and accountability first priority. I covered nuclear power in my paper as a green energy source that relies on cutting-edge research and strict safety guidelines. Along with renewable sources, it should be a part of an energy transition strategy—not the major one. Achieving a successful energy transition necessitates finding a middle ground that addresses the disadvantages of nuclear power while maximizing its advantages.
1988
Nuclear energy is one of the most popular topics of today’s publication market. The literature about the pros and cons of nuclear power may easily fill a whole library. Is there anything new to add to this voluminous body of arguments and contra-arguments that would justify editing another book on nuclear energy? Andrew Blowers and David Pepper obviously felt that way and published a reader on Nuclear Power in Crisis. The book consists of 13 articles covering mainly the political, social and health aspects of nuclear power. Several of the chapters were papers presented at the Annual Conference of the Institute of British Geographers at Leeds, UK, in 1985.
In the Age of Climate Change, the Low-Carbon Nature of Nuclear Power Trumps Its Downsides
2019
In the climate impacted world, it is clear that nuclear energy is seen a powerful alternative for the fossil fuels in terms of electricity generation. Nuclear power is seen as a source to reduce carbon emissions beside hydro, wind, bioenergy, and solar energy. On the other hand, after Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011, the importance of continuing efforts not to deny the risks of nuclear power occurred. The incidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima underlined the necessity of taking precautions in terms of nuclear plants and the safety. This work presents that how terms of decarbonization policies, a level playing field that allows all low-carbon generation technologies to compete on their merits can be created. It also shows how scientific researches and recent disasters invite the international community to think about whether nuclear power could solve the problems in the warming world.
Nuclear energy–Any solution for sustainability and climate protection
For the future of nuclear power it will be decisive whether or not nuclear fission technologies offer a sustainable solution to global energy problems. The impressive expansion of nuclear reactors in the 1960s and 1970 slowed down after the meltdown in Harrisburg and the nuclear explosion in Chernobyl. Since the end of the 1980s installed nuclear capacity has stagnated, and in Europe declined. However, a nuclear revival or renaissance has been predicted for 30 years. This article reviews global scenarios and national nuclear programmes and analyses problems in the nuclear industry. Special attention is given to nuclear power and global warming and the nexus between nuclear power and nuclear proliferation.