Introduction to A Research Agenda for Heritage Planning: the state of heritage planning in Europe (original) (raw)
Related papers
Towards a Shared Understanding of the Concept of Heritage in the European Context
Heritage, 2019
The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of commonalities and differences in the concept of cultural heritage in Europe. This was achieved through a comprehensive academic and non-academic literature review focused on different definitions and conceptualisations related to cultural heritage internationally and in the European context. This is complemented with a comparative study in three European countries. This paper frames cultural heritage using the foundation set up by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). It further discusses the European actors involved in defining heritage today. Finally, it focuses on three European countries and verifies that they share an understanding of cultural heritage including classifications, categorisation and heritage values. Findings from the overall study show how the definition of cultural heritage across Europe is reasonably homogeneous, and this is confirmed by the analysis of the thre...
The making and unmaking of Heritage
2015
Heritage is defined by history which is by nature multi layered. The passage of time and the perspectives it affords, enables and even necessitates constant reexamination and reinterpretation of history. What effect do changes in historical perspective then have upon the definition of heritage which relies on an understanding of its history? The present paper attempts to engage with the notion of heritage, criteria of its definition, and the mutable nature of such designations with specific reference to architectural constructions and historical cities that enjoy or have enjoyed in the past the status of a ‘World Heritage Site’. Examples such as the Louvre museum in Paris or the King’s Cross station in London make an interesting study as they not only allow insight into the past but reflect the changes and adaptation over a period of time. Multiple alterations, some very recently, have modified them extensively since the time they were accorded the ‘World Heritage Site’ status. The ...
Routledge, 2020
Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union: The European Heritage Label provides an interdisciplinary examination of the ways in which European cultural heritage is created, communicated, and governed via the European Heritage Label scheme. Drawing on ethnographic field research conducted across ten countries at sites that have been awarded with the European Heritage Label, the authors of the book approach heritage as an entangled social, spatial, temporal, discur-sive, narrative, performative, and embodied process. Recognising that heritage is inherently political and used by diverse actors as a tool for re-imagining communities, identities, and borders, and for generating notions of inclusion and exclusion in Europe, the book also considers the idea of Europe itself as a narrative. Chapters tackle issues such as multilevel governance of heritage; geopolitics of border-crossings and border-making; participation and non-participation; and embodiment and affective experience of heritage. Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union advances heritage studies with an interdisciplinary approach that utilises and combines theories and conceptualizations from critical geopolitics, political studies, EU and European studies, cultural policy research, and cultural studies. As such, the volume will be of interest to scholars and students engaged in the study of heritage , politics, belonging, the EU, ideas, and narratives of Europe.
2019
ICOMOS University Forum organised by the UNESCO Chair on Heritage Futures at Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden and the Amsterdam School for Heritage, Memory and Material Culture, in collaboration with ICOMOS International, ICOMOS Netherlands, and City of Amsterdam, held at Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019. The meeting aims at promoting to think and plan the future in heritage management. How do we perceive of the future? Which future do heritage professionals work for? What heritage will be needed in the future (and how do we know)? How can we build capacity in future thinking among heritage professionals worldwide? The participants will include academics and heritage managers, both young and established, from many parts of the world.
European Spatial Research and Policy, 2014
The present issue of European Spatial Research and Policy is the first of two numbers dedicated to 'Planning systems facing heritage issues in Europe: from protection to management, in the plural interpretations of the values of the past'. The concept arose from a meeting held in June 2013 at the conference on 'Changing Cities' in Skiathos, Greece, where a group of planners decided to compare the experiences we have at the interface between heritage and planning in a range of European countries. European societies are becoming increasingly fond of the historical dimension of their cities. Traces from the past, both physical and cultural, are cherished because they are carrying territorial identities. This evolution has reached the European discourse, with the Florence convention of the Council of Europe (2000), as well as the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, which states in its Preamble that 'Our cities possess unique cultural and architectural qualities, strong forces of social inclusion and exceptional possibilities for economic development' (Informal Council of the Ministers in charge of Urban Development of the European Union, 2007). At the global level, UNESCO promotes a similar vision. The Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (2011) defines historic urban landscape: […] the urban area understood as the result of a historic layering of cultural and natural values and attributes, extending beyond the notion of 'historic centre' or 'ensemble' to include the broader urban context and its geographical setting. This wider context includes notably the site's topography, geomorphology, hydrology and natural features, its built environment, both historic and contemporary, its infrastructures above and below ground, its open spaces and gardens, its land use patterns and spatial organization, perceptions and visual relationships, as well as all other elements of the
'The Values of Heritage A New Paradigm for the 21st Century', 2017 05 (pp. 99-105)
The traditional 20th century approach to architectural heritage focused on attributed cultural values. In the Postwar era, these were predicated on the hypothesis that only selected, designated examples of our built heritage would survive the drive to adapt and modernise our homes, towns and cities. This assumption conflicts with today’s agendas of sustainable development and climate change, which embrace wider societal, cultural and environmental issues and recognise additional, complementary values: including community, resource, and usefulness. Awareness raising is a critical challenge for the preservation and maintenance of Postwar to Postmodern built cultural heritage in the 21st century. This paper explores the importance of promoting a holistic understanding of the concept of heritage, the range of values which support the protection and conservation of our 20th century built heritage over and above a narrow focus on often non-consensual cultural ones, and the role of this heritage as a driver for sustainable urban development in the 21st century.
How is Heritage Created: The Heritage Creation Process in Society
5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Ancience Science, 2018
A defining characteristic of society in the 20 th and the 21th century, in addition to the rapid development of science, technology and social systems, is the attempt to consciously preserve as much as possible of the past and the present for future generations. This article discusses the theoretical background of the heritage creation process and analyses the process based on different levels of society. To recognize something as heritage is to bring along its political, legal, economic and social influences. The questions that consistently emerge are: to whom does heritage belong, and to what extent. A person's rights to use their property is legally bound when it comes to heritage objects, so it seems that at least from the cultural perspective, heritage belongs to all of mankind. Since heritage plays an important role in shaping and preserving group identity, the people need to have a guaranteed right to make decisions regarding their own heritage. This means that when it comes to recognising something as heritage, determining its values and preserving it, it is first and foremost the right of the people and the groups of people to whom this heritage matters. As heritage is now defined as an living process in contemporary society, with its own specific goals and methods, then the decision to recognise something as heritage must be based on the needs of the same society. What inevitably follows from this perspective is that any past decisions regarding something as heritage are by no means "everlasting" but can, and must, be reviewed.