Materials are social constructs, but they also have agency (original) (raw)

Abstract

A puzzling matter about materials, particularly structural materials, is that they exhibit both a rather extraordinary extension in time, bridging over many historical and prehistorical ages, and a dynamic dimension, changing as they are in time to the point that materials may not be easily recognized as similar today as thousands of years ago. To understand this dichotomy, it is necessary to reach beyond materials science and STEM disciplines and to collect concepts and methods from SSH. Materials and energy are at the core of the physical world in which society functions: they provide the structure of the artifacts that we need, along with the ability to make and use them. They do not exist in an absolute, Aristotelian world, but are invented along historical time, by people to meet their needs, hic et nunc. Materials are social constructs, as is the "theory" (technology, science in modern language) that gives us the keys for making them. As society changes historically, people's needs evolve and "new" materials are created on the shoulders of older ones, in a kind of evolutionary process. This is the view of social constructivism. This evolutionary metaphor is a first explanation of the continuity between, say, iron from a Roman bloomery and steel, as a contemporary commercial product. This has been formulated as the Social Cycle of Materials (SCM) by sociologists of Knowledge and Innovation, as a process of continuous innovation in which materials are socially constructed over and over again, a process often called "progress". The continuity from old to new materials needs to be explained by some other model, however, to be fully understood: indeed, why is iron enduring so much, when it might have been displaced by another material at each evolutionary step and it didn't. The explanation we propose is to accept that "materials have agency", i.e. that they themselves are the actors of their own perenniality. This refers to another model, the Actor Network Theory (ANT) of Latour et al., which analyzes how change is pulled by a combined network of actors, that include people, organizations, non-human living entities and inanimate things as well.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (21)

  1. A. Borian, M.J. Black, O. Mwabonje, Life Cycle Assess- ment -A metric for the circular economy, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021, 400 p
  2. J.-P. Birat, Chapter 3: Environmental aspects: Treatise on Process Metallurgy, in: Life Cycle Assessment and related methodologies, 2nd ed, 2022
  3. B. Latour, Pasteur : guerre et paix des microbes, 16/04/2012, La Découverte Poche/Sciences humaines et sociales n°114, 364 p; in English: The pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1993
  4. M. Ashby, Materials selection in mechanical design, Elsevier, 4th ed, 2011
  5. L. d'Andrea, A. Declich, F. Feudo, Hidden societal implications of materials. Updating the awareness on what is at stake, Mateŕiaux & Techniques 102(5), 504 (2014)
  6. L. d'Andrea, A. Declich, Materials, technology and society: Contributions from a sociological perspective, Mateŕiaux & Techniques 102(5), 507 (2014)
  7. B. Latour, On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications, Soziale Welt 47, 369-381 (1996), http://www.cours.fse.ulaval.ca/edc-65804/latour- clarifications.pdf
  8. M. Akrich, Comment décrire les objets techniques ? Techni- ques et Culture 9, 49-64 (1987)
  9. B. Latour, Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor- network-theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005
  10. G. Baiocchi, D. Graizbord, M. Rodríguez-Muñiz, Actor- network theory and the ethnographic imagination: An exercise in translation, Qual. Sociol. 36, 323-341 (2013)
  11. A. Mahil, D.-G. Tremblay, Théorie de l'acteur-réseau, https://books.openedition.org/pum/4363?lang=fr
  12. J.-P. Birat, A new approach to Materials LCA, based on ANT, in: SAM-16 Conference, 8-9 November, 2022, to be published by Matériaux & Techniques, 2023
  13. M. Serres, Hermès III : La traduction, 1974
  14. S. Markus, "Agency", in: E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/agency/
  15. P.J. Martin, A. Denis (eds.), Human agents and social structures, Manchester University Press, 2013
  16. B. Bensaude-Vincent (ed.), Between nature and society: Biographies of materials, World Scientific, 2022, 206 p 17. W. Bijker, T. Pinch, The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, Sage Publications, Social Studies of Science, 1984, pp. 399-440
  17. K. Birat, Finding fault bridging the science/culture gap in Uzma Aslam Khan's thinner than skin, presented for publication to Commonwealth Essays and Studies, 2023
  18. A. Mansoor, Non-human narrative agency -Textual sedi- mentation in Pakistani anglophone literature, in: The Routledge Companion to Pakistani Anglophone Writing, Routledge, 2019, pp. 297-316
  19. A. van Oyen, Material agency, in: S.L. López Varela (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, 2018
  20. M.D. Kirchhoff, Material agency: a theoretical framework for ascribing agency to material culture, Techné: Res. Philos. Technol. 13(3), (2009)
  21. Cite this article as: Jean-Pierre Birat, Materials are social constructs, but they also have agency, Matériaux & Techniques 111,