The Politics of Financial Development and Capital Accumulation (original) (raw)
Related papers
The politics of financial development: The role of interest groups and government capabilities
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012
Financial development is good for long term growth. So why doesn't every country pursue policies that render full financial development? In this paper, building on a profuse political economy literature, we build a theoretical model that shows that the intensity of opposition by incumbents depends on both their degree of credit dependency and the role of governments in credit markets. We provide empirical evidence for this claim. The results suggest that lower opposition to financial development leads to an effective increase in credit markets' development only in those countries that have high government capabilities. Moreover, improvements in government capabilities have a significant impact on credit market development only in those countries where credit dependency is high (thus, opposition is low). We thus contribute to this rich literature by providing a unified account of credit market development that includes two of its main determinants, traditionally considered in isolation.
Notes on Financial System Development and Political Intervention
The World Bank Economic Review, 2013
This paper studies the impact of political intervention on a financial system that consists of banks and financial markets and develops over time. In this financial system, banks and markets exhibit three forms of interaction: they compete, they complement each other, and they co-evolve. Coevolution is generated by two new ingredients of financial system architecture relative to the existing theories: securitization and risk-sensitive bank capital. We show that securitization propagates banking advances to the financial market, permitting market evolution to be driven by bank evolution, and market advances are transmitted to banks through bank capital. We then examine how politicians determine the nature of political intervention designed to expand credit availability. We find that political intervention in banking exhibits a U-shaped pattern,
The Effect of Political Factors on Financial Development
This paper examines the effect of political factors on financial development using the dynamic panel data of 60 countries during 2008-2016. The empirical results show that development in financial system positively responds to the variation of political variables. In fact, the political factors alongside their positive and direct effect on financial activities could affect financial system through the other determinants. All the political variables such as political competition, democracy, durability, Political stability, freedom and political rights proved that have effect on financial development alone and through the other determinants of financial development like economic institution, trade openness and financial openness. Since the response of financial system to the variation of political variables differed, financial system in countries with different political structure had a different reaction to the policies that were implemented in order to promote financial system. This could be a possible reason that why financial system in different countries has different reactions to the implemented policies.
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
The aim of this paper is to test the relationship between financial development (FD), political institutions (PI), income inequalities (II), and poverty. We tested this relationship using different estimation methods and two separate samples. The first sample consists of a panel of 93 democratic countries and the second includes a panel of 31 autocratic countries. Results indicate that, unlike in autocratic countries, FD and democratic institutions, taken separately, help to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor by reducing poverty in democratic countries. To the contrary of autocratic countries, the interaction between FD and PI, strangely enough, does not reduce II and poverty in democratic countries. Analysis of the sub-democratic group yields opposite results, particularly in low-, mid-, and upper-mid-income countries compared with high-income countries.
The Role of Finance in Economic Development – Benefits, Risks, and Politics
Theoretical and empirical research has shown that a sound and effective financial system is critical for economic development and growth. The financial system, however, is also subject to boom and bust cycles and fragility, with negative repercussions for the real economy. Further, the political structure of societies, often pre-determined by historic experience, is critical for the structure and development of the financial system. This paper is a critical survey of three related strands of literature -the finance and growth literature, the literature on financial fragility, and the politics and finance literature. literature that has explored the causes and socioeconomic costs of financial fragility, including systemic banking crises. Historic analyses and case studies have given way to more systemic cross-country explorations of idiosyncratic and systemic banking distress and their determinants.
The Political Economy of Financial Liberalisation
2005
Political economy theories of financial development argue that in countries where a narrow elite controls political decisions, financial development may be deliberately obstructed to deny access to finance to potential competitors. This paper empirically examines whether the level of liberalisation of the banking system, the stock market and capital account depend on regime characteristics, using panel data from 26 countries from 1973 -1999. Our results show that it is predominantly fully democratic regimes that have liberalised financial systems.
Democracy, Finance and Development
2006
The paper tests the hypothesis of a positive impact of democratization on growth and economic development in the sense of capabilities and improvements in well-being. We employ a probit model to estimate the probabilistic indicator for democracy for a large sample of countries. Panel regressions are applied to explain the impact on growth of political institutions (democracy), economic institutions and efficiency of financial management, along with more "traditional" factors. The empirical findings support the hypothesis of decisive role of democratic political and efficient economic institutions in stimulating economic growth. The main results also highlight the importance of effective allocation of financial resources. In addition to the growth regression results, it is argued, consistently with the capabilities approach to development by Sen, that many of the explanatory variables in the growth regression are positively related to development as capabilities enhancement...