IN PURSUIT OF INTEGRITY IN URBAN MORPHOLOGY: CULTURAL LANDSCAPE VS URBAN LANDSCAPE (original) (raw)
Related papers
Consolidating urban morphology as a discipline
function as neighbourhood centres and identifying routes and pathways immediately around them that seem to have poor connectivity; and examining clusters of activity spaces or other places that should have a high degree of interconnection.
Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field
Urban morphology, 1997
The forces and events leading to the formation of the International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF) are identified. ISUF is expanding the field of urban morphology beyond its original confines in geography, particularly into the domains of architecture and planning. Three schools of urban morphology, in England, Italy and France, are coming together, following seminal work by two morphologists, M.R.G.
Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the research field of urban morphology: the study of urban form. Urban morphology is a growing field of cross-disciplinary research, attracting worldwide interest among scholars in architecture, geography and planning. It aims to decipher the physical form, the urban landscape or townscape of complex contemporary cities. This paper discusses the evolution of urban morphology, from its conceptual foundations in research on the physical form of urban areas. Interestingly, the roots of urban morphology can be traced back to different disciplines in different countries. This discussion will cast light on various research perspectives of urban morphology, as well as discussing similarities and differences between the geographical and the architectural approaches to urban form studies. This is followed by a closer look at the theories developed by Gianfranco Caniggia and MRG Conzen. Their work has been an inspiration for many practitioners and researchers, including Whitehand, Maffei, and Moudon to name a few. Finally, a schematic diagram is presented, which reflects the heightened activity of research on physical form that is currently occurring in several disciplines simultaneously, and showing the relationships between research traditions and authors. As the formation and development of the urban landscape becomes ever more diverse, it is necessary to revisit and use
Mapping Urban Form: Morphology studies in the contemporary urban landscape
2009
PART 1. Setting the scene 11 Chapter 1. Introduction 13 PART 3. Mapping cases 105 Chapter 7. Mapping cases, preliminary settings 107 7. 1. Introducing the two contexts: Two urban regions, two different spatial configurations 108 7.1.1 Natural elements 109 7.1.2 Spatial configuration 110 7.1.3 Spatial Transformation 111 7.1.4 Planning 113 7.1.5 Comparative observations 116 7. 2. Mapping and Urban form in the Bogotá-Sabana region and the Randstad: previous studies 120 7.2.1 Region Bogotá-Sabana: local studies and scarce regional view 120 7.2.2 Randstad: over mapped and analyzed 120 7. 3. Mapping methodology 124 7.3.1 Mapping Process: 124 7.3.2 Sources and maps 124 7.3.3 Cross-sections: strategy to map urban regions 126 7.3.4 The selection of the cross-sections 129 7.3.5 Homogeneous areas 129 7.3.6 Scales 129 Chapter 8. Atlas 133 8. 1. Mapping the cross-sections: Homogeneous areas 134 8. 2. Analysis example areas, Bogotá's cross-section 136 8.2.1 Colonial centres 139 8.2.2 Gridded entities by jumps 140 8.2.3 Rectangular grid 142 8.2.4 Composition of blocks in stamps 144 8.2.5 Minimal progressively filled grid from illegal origin 146 8.2.6 Minimal progressively filled planned grid 148 8.2.7 Progressively saturated branch 150 8.2.8 Linear in slope with dispersed derivations 152 8.2.9 Ensembles 154 8.2.10 Extra minimal grid in ensembles 156 8.2.11 City inside the city 157 8.2.12 Large industrial linear developments 158 8.2.13 Large peri-urban blocks 160 8.2.14 Urbanized rural circuits 162 8.2.15 Rural extra large blocks 164 8.2.16 Rural branches 165 8.2.17 Large open areas 166 8. 3. Comparative observations within the Bogotá-Sabana section 167 8.3.1 Grid patterns against branch patterns: Designed against resulted 174 8.3.2 The transformation of the grid 174 8.3.3 Super-grid 176 8.3.4 Circuits as In between areas, actual evidence of three ways of development colliding 177 8. 4. Analysis of example areas in the Randstad cross-section 178 8.4.1 Linear developments 181 8.4.2 Designed ground plan with free standing buildings 182 8.4.3 Designed ground plan with continuous buildings 184 8.4.4 Optimized grid 185 8.4.5 Bars in stamps 186 8.4.6 Cauliflower neighbourhoods 188 8.4.7 Super-grid enclosing residential grid pieces 190 8.4.8 Large blocks in balloon connected to highway 192 8.4.9 Gridded islands, semi-open blocks 194 8.4.10 New urban centres 195 8.4.11 Incomplete large border blocks 196 8.4.12 Rural polder pattern 198 8.4.13 Glasshouses conglomerates 200 8.4.14 Large open areas 201 8. 5. Comparative observations Randstad section 201 8.5.1 The separation of connection scales: emergence of a super-grid 208 8.5.2 Three types of relation to the surrounding urban landscape and the region 210 8.5.3 In between areas 210 8. 6. Back to the regional scale: how areas interact 211 8.6.1 Layers in the Bogotá-Sabana region 211 8.6.2 In between layers 214 8.6.3 Layers in the Randstad 214 8.6.4 In between layers 216 8. 7. Higher scale of comparison: Bogotá-Sabana versus Randstad 217 8.7.1 Three types of development in relation to the totality 217 8.7.2 Disconnected or connected parts depending on the observation scale 218 8.7.3 In between areas: common characteristics 219 8. 8. Observations in relation to the spatial configuration at the scale of the region 220 PART 4. Conclusions and evaluation Chapter 9. Partial conclusions 9. 1. Traditional morphological approach, what to bring forward? 9. 2. General elements from recent approaches 9. 3. The general and the specific: post evaluation of the case studies 9.3.1 Context of the mapmaker: 9.3.2 Context of the map: intention or goal 9.3.3 Signs and techniques 9. 4. The comparison process, found repetitions and differences 9.4.1 Responding to the comparison objectives: 9.4.2 The comparison as a non lineal process, specificities of each context guiding following steps 9.4.3 Coinciding themes 9.4.4 Typical contemporary themes and their relation to the mapped cases Chapter 10. General conclusions and recommendations 10. 1. How to generate a common and generalized knowledge about the formal logic of the contemporary urban landscape? 10. 2. Common or repetitive spatial features and principles in the contemporary urban landscape 10. 3. Mapping elements, scales and abstractions 10. 4. For future research 10.4.1 Case studies 10.4.2 Mapping urban form in relation to other dimensions of the urban landscape 10.4.3 Cartographic enthusiasm 10.4.4 Design tasks 10. 5. Closing References Samenvatting Acknowledgements Curriculum vitae Camila Pinzón Cortes, November 2009 The second chapter presents the theoretical framework by shedding more light on the main components, urban form, mapping, and the contemporary urban landscape, as they are used in this research. In order to do this, the traditional urban morphological approach and the recent mapping of the landscape and the territory are introduced. Finally, the contemporary urban landscape is introduced through the terminology which has been developed to name it. Part 2-Meta-mapping Ch 1. General introduction: Research questions / Aims / Methodology Ch 2. Setting up the scene Urban morphology / Mapping / Contemporary Urban landscape Ch 10. General conclusions and recommendations for further research Ch 9. Cross-conclusions Part 1-Introduction Part 4 Ch 8. Atlas Ch 7. Introduction cases Ch 3. Urban morphology tradition Ch 4. Mapping the landscape and the territory Ch 5. Context of the map: other maps Ch 6. Conclusions Part 3-Mapping cases Kahn, L.
Urban morphology and urban design
2008
Journal ArticleThere has recently been a flurry of discussion in this journal about the relationship between urban morphological research and practice (Hall, 2008; Samuels, 2008; Whitehand, 2007). As a practising architect and planner, I have frequently applied the concepts of typology and morphology in my design work. 1 have used neighbourhood morphology to develop a successful architectural parti that married a new type to an older pattern: I have used the morphological narrative of a dying small downtown to develop its urban plans and guidelines for its recovery (Scheer and Scheer, 1998)
A Framework for Urban Morphology Regarding to the Form
Armanshahr, 2015
Rapid urban population is widely known as the main inducement of growing cities in terms of quantity and variety in form. However, the city expansion entails physical challenges and it has profound impacts on the issue of urban morphology. It raises global awareness beyond the urbanism and includes sociology, psychology, economics as well as environmental studies due to the implications of broadness. The accentuation on morphological studies is on the grounds of fabric segregation in cities of developing countries where the patterns of modern developments are usually not in good agreement with traditional part. Causing several concerns, it urges morphological studies to attain urban fabric integrity. Therefore, this research aims to study morphology in respect to the form and subsequently proposes a framework of to-be-investigated indices. This study looks for identifying modules and excerpts of traditional core of cities in order to be fostered in future development and to make achievement of physical integration more viable. Having a conceptual-comparative approach, the study unveils the framework consists of urban paths and blocks in details of indices and items. It distinguishes seven indices for paths whereas the blocks have thirteen. Benefiting urban design and planning, setting a framework needs regulation and guideline for future development from morphological point of view and it could be applied for urban regeneration particularly from physical aspect.
Urban morphology has formed a part of Anglophone human geography since the early 1900s. The aim here is to summarize its development since then, and to identify particular 'schools' or traditions of urban morphology that emerged over this time. These 'schools' are an important dimension of morphological study internationally and reflect different strands of urban morphology as well as the influence of key thinkers at particular times. The most thorough
Urban Morphology, 2006
Urban morphology is a thriving field of enquiry involving researchers from a wide diversity of disciplinary, linguistic and cultural backgrounds. While this diversity has helped advance our understanding of the complexity of urban form, confusion and controversy has also arisen over the various theoretical formulations forwarded by researchers from different philosophical and epistemological backgrounds. With the aim of improving intelligibility in the field, this paper proposes a straightforward scheme to identify, classify and interpret, or 'map', individual contributions to the study of urban form according to their respective theoretical or epistemological perspectives. Drawing upon epistemological discussions familiar to the readers of this journal, the authors first distinguish between cognitive and normative studies. A second distinction is made between internalist studies that consider urban form as a relatively independent system, and externalist studies in which urban form stands as a passive product of various external determinants. Using these basic criteria, it is possible to interpret and synthesize a multitude of contributions and map them using a simple Cartesian grid. The paper highlights how contributions from seemingly different theoretical approaches to urban morphology are intrinsically similar in their treatment of urban form as an object of enquiry.