Refining Dryland Farming Systems as a Means of Enhancing Agrodiversity and Food Security in Eastern Kenya: A review (original) (raw)
Related papers
Dryland Farming and Food Security in Kenya: Challenges and Research Priorities
2011
Introduction Agriculture is the mainstay of the country and especially when defined to mean and include farming, livestock rearing, fishing and related activities. It contributes about 24% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), 75% of industrial raw materials and 60% of export earnings and about 18% of the total formal employment (Republic of Kenya, 2007; 2008). In addition, it employs about 3.8 million people in farm, livestock production and fishing while an estimated 4.5 million other people are employed in agriculture-related off-farm activities. The foregoing importance of the sector notwithstanding, about 70% of the agriculturally potential land is owned by about 5% of individuals and 90% of the farms exceeding 3 hectares have absentee landlords in Kenya (Platteau, 1992), which leaves about 40% of Kenyans food-poor. As such, many acres of agriculturally viable land remain unused across the country. This is partly responsible for poverty, food insecurity and poor rural livelihoods (O...
ChapterS Potential of Dryland Farming in Kenya and Environmental Implications
With the arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) accounting for more than 70%of Kenya's total land area, and supporting an increasing population of both humans and animals, investment in water resources development will be a critical research and policy agenda for national development. From 1998 to date, devastating droughts have been persistent in Kenya to the level of being declared national disasters. Drought events translate into severe soil moisture deficits, far below crop and pasture water requirements. Often this is followed by crop failure and hence hunger, famine, livestock deaths and general human suffering. By way of intervention, government has often responded by focusing on short term measures like appealing for food aid, which in essence is a reminder of urgent policy re-orientation that would make ASAL areas self-sufficient when it comes to guaranteeing people's basic needs like food. A look at previous drought incidences in Kenya seems to suggest that although such...
Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Agricultural Land Management in Kenya
2006
Despite technological advances in land management (i.e. use, care and improvement) across the world, land degradation not only persists, but also continues to escalate, thus threatening the livelihood of many agriculturally dependent communities. Projections of world food situation into 2020for instance singles out potential scarcity of maize an important cereal in Kenya, whose demand will have to be met by a 40% increase in grain production, however on a steadily deteriorating land resource (Pinstrup-Andersen et al., 1999). Estimates from the Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) indicate that degradation of crop land and pasture land is most extensive in Africa, affecting 65% and 31% of the two systems respectively (Scherr and Yadav, 1996). In Kenya, 73% of land degradation is attributed to overgrazing and arable agriculture, while conversion of arid and semi-arid lands to other uses accounts for some 14% of land degradation (Mutiso, 1991). With increasing population pres...
Land and soil make up the cardinal resource-base in any agricultural production system and, hence, their proper management is vital for sustainable agricultural production. A study was conducted to evaluate the availability and accessibility as well as constraints to utilization of land and soil resources for sustainable agricultural production in Kenya. The study covered 33 districts drawn from 6 out of the 8 administrative provinces in the country. The selected districts were drawn from agriculturally active provinces. The methodology used in data gathering included collection of information from secondary sources, use of questionnaires, field visits and personal interviews. The country has an area of 583,000 km 2 , out of which land and water occupy 571,770 and 11,230 km 2 , respectively. About 33% and 67% of Kenya's land mass are designated as available agricultural land and arid and semiarid land, respectively. Less than 40% of the available agricultural land is utilized. Only 5% of the country's drainage potential is developed. Besides, most of the semiarid land is of high potential for agricultural production provided irrigation is applied. The country's irrigation potential is estimated at 54,000 ha out of which 20% is developed. More land may be reclaimed for agricultural production from the semi-arid land by applying irrigation. Agricultural land availability is, therefore, not limiting to agricultural production. Skewed land ownership that leaves most of the land in the hands of few people is a factor that undermines access to, and development of, the land. Erosion risk and soil shallowness are important constraints. Suitable land/soil conservation measures targeting all forms of soil degradation processes in relation to agricultural systems in given agro-ecological zones need to be developed if the land/soil resources of the country are to be utilized for sustainable agricultural production.
Declines in soil fertility and water, prolonged dry-spells/droughts and erratic climatic patterns in general continue to undermine optimal agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Drier parts of Eastern Kenya already endure low/declining soil fertility, low soil water content, increased temperatures/atmospheric heat, and unpredictable rainfall and drought patterns. These have occasioned continued declines in smallholder farm productivity (below 1 Mg ha-1 against a potential of 6-8 Mg ha-1) and resiliency. Optimizing on on-farm soil water and fertility management through conservation agriculture (CA) technologies such as sustained soil cover/residue retention, micro-dosing and minimum tillage, integrated with selected tree species (for soil fertility enhancement, fodder, firewood) may hold in upgrading and developing resiliency towards extreme climatic risks among smallholder farming systems. Redressing the problem of increased food insecurity and productivity challenge...
Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa, 2011
This chapter presents the results of studies on a production system calJed Dryland Eco-Farm (DEF) that addresses a range of constraints to agricultural productivity in dryland Africa. It combines the use of live hedges and alJeys of Acacia colei, "demi-Iunes" in which are planted domesticated Ziziphus mauritiania. Annual crops like pearl millet (Pellllisetumglaucu111 (L.) R.Br.), cowpeas and roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) are planted in rotation. This trial teststhe effect of the system on (1) soil erosion control, soilfertility and water use efficiency,(2) crop yield and biomass production, and (3) improving income generation and diversification. Averagepearl millet yields in the DEF were twice the control (880 vs. 430 kg ha-I) whenno mineral fertilizer was applied. With the applicationof NPK, millet yields were almost similar under both conditions (950 vs. 780 kg ha-I). Cowpea yields were on average seven times higher than the control without NPK (1,400 vs. 200 kg ha-I total biomass) andthree times with NPK (1,850 vs. 650 kg ha-J total biomass). RoselJe yield increased four times on averagewithout NPK (205 vs. 60 kg ha-I calices yield) and twotimes with NPK (234 vs. 114 kg ha-I). Therefore, the system has the potential to produce yield response similar to that of the recommended rate of 100 kg of the 15-15-15fertilizer per ha. The return to land is estimatedat US 224fortheDEFcomparedtoUS224 for the DEF compared to US 224fortheDEFcomparedtoUS77 for the traditional millet-cowpea system. This system has the potential to improve productivity and rural livelihood in the drylands of Africa while sustaining the naturalresources base.
Soil and water conservation in semi-arid Kenya
1993
Sub-Saharan Africa is beset by an increasing population putting stringent demands on a declining resource base. Soil and water conservation (S&WC) is often seen as the primary means to arrest the inevitable decline in soil quality and maintain the productivity of farming systems upon which the majority of the populace rely for their precarious living standards. Yet S&WC programmes have a patchy record: in humid areas they may be relatively successful, but in semi-arid areas there is neither evidence of widespread adoption of S&WC nor increased production. These marginal areas, economically and climatically present the most intractable challenge to natural resource managers. This study investigates the performance of S&WC in rainfed cropping in the drier parts of Kenya, paying particular emphasis to the yield benefits and economic viability of crop production systems for the small scale and most vulnerable of the rural land users. Results are based upon a series of experiments conduc...
International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology
The study focused on assessing the impact of farming systems and land use change on dryland biodiversity and documented the views, knowledge and practice of the farmers on the role of biodiversity in the semi-arid midlands of Eastern Kenya. A descriptive survey design was employed to collect data on famers' views, knowledge and practices from 120 respondents from four locations in Mwala and Yatta Sub Counties in Machakos County. Nested Quadrat method was employed to determine levels of loss of plant live forms in the cultivated and uncultivated areas in the four locations. The collected data was then analyzed using simple descriptive statistical such as percentages, frequency and means. Other methods used in the analysis included Logistic regression, Pearson Chi-square and t-tests. The study established that Households in the study areas understand the benefits of non-crop tree species (100%) and therefore grow the tree species (72%) and also conserve the indigenous species (88%). Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis further showed that the age and level of education of the respondents were the strongest statistically significant factors affecting the farmers' knowledge on above ground biodiversity and its relevance to crop production (p < 0.005). It was also established that mixed farming system was the main farming system practiced by 98% of the households in Mwala and Yatta sub counties, with crops and livestock on the same farm. It was established that average population of plant live forms (grass, shrubs and trees) in the study sites was found to be significantly different between cultivated and uncultivated zones in the four locations (p <0.005). It is concluded that human activities such as farming increases loss of plant live forms and interferes with above ground biodiversity and reduces the effectiveness of crop-livestock integration in the production systems due to reduced grazing areas.