Transitivity alternations in Yucatec, and the correlation between aspect and argument roles (original) (raw)
Related papers
Split intransitivity, linking, and lexical representation: the case of Yukatek Maya
Split-intransitive systems of argument marking provide an excellent opportunity to study the structure of the lexical-semantic representations that underlie argument structure alternations and argument linking rules. Yukatek Maya has a typologically rare split-intransitive pattern of argument marking controlled by overt aspect-mood marking. Krämer & Wunderlich (1999) have advanced an analysis according to which the linking of thematic relations to syntactic arguments is governed by lexical aspect as the sole lexical-semantic property linking principles are sensitive to in this language. Critical evidence against this proposal comes from the transitivity alternations of three classes of intransitive verbs: ‘degree achievement’ verbs, ‘non-internally-caused’ process verbs, and posture verbs. Transitivity alternations emerge as being governed by the distinction of internally- vs. externally-caused events. The Yukatek facts suggest that argument linking operates on a lexical information structure (‘event structure’) that partially determines (and thus also underspeficies) both lexical aspect and participant structure.
Grammatical periphery of Chontal Maya verb
University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, 2018
This paper examines the formal structure of the grammatical tense/aspect/mood system in Chontal, a Mayan language from Mexico. The verbal grammar is analyzed as a continuum of semantically and morphosyntactically interrelated phenomena of different sorts, from fully grammaticalized (grammatical core) to those lexical items that may possibly be grammaticalized in the future (grammatical periphery). The distinction between grammatical core and periphery is not only important in order to represent in an appropriate way the internal architecture of a grammatical system, but can also help to better understand semantic properties of its structural components. The core elements are usually ambiguous and express very general meanings; the peripheral elements may optionally make them more precise, thereby disambiguating the utterance.
Two Kinds of Syntactic Ergativity in Mayan
2017
Some Mayan languages are syntactically ergative, i.e. they prohibit straightforward A'-extraction of transitive ergative subjects (Polinsky 2016). Observe (1) from Q'anjob'al (Coon et al. 2014). (1) Q'anjob'al (S = intransitive subject; O = transitive object; A = transitive subject) a. Maktxel i max way-i t i ? 1 S-extraction who ASP sleep-ITV 'Who slept?' *We thank Doña Rosario de Chocojay for her patience in providing the Tz'utujiil judgements, as well as (alphabetically)
The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya
2017
The objective of this paper is to fill a void in the formal syntactic literature on Mayan languages by proposing a syntactic structure for clauses with non-verbal predicates in Yucatec Maya. The paper attempts to integrate the rich descriptions of non-verbal predicate constructions found in more functionally-oriented accounts (Lehmann 2002 [1998]; Verhoeven 2007; Vapnarsky 2013) with insights from the generative literature on argument licensing and clause structure in Mayan languages (Coon 2016 for an overview) as well as small clauses (Citko 2011 for an overview). I conclude that non-verbal sentences in Yucatec are matrix small clauses embedded under an Infl node, which is the locus for finiteness/ stative aspect rather than tense morphology. This simple structure, coupled with independently motivated operations that have been proposed for small clauses and argument licensing/word order in Mayan languages, is able to account for a range of properties of these sentences that improve...
Polycategoriality across Mayan languages: action nouns and ergative splits
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 2017
This article presents a comparative study of Mayan languages belonging to three different branches (Cholan, Tseltalan and Yucatecan), with respect to polycategoriality. Mayan languages appear to be particularly interesting for exploring polycategoriality for several structural reasons, as well as for the way relevant properties vary across the Mayan family. We analyze levels and processes of categorial determination and their relationship with other facts, in particular the ergative splits (aspectual and agentive). We study morphophonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties for evaluating polycategoriality at the root or stem level. At the structure level, we put forth the hypothesis of a hybrid nature based on simultaneous nominal and verbal properties. For some cases, a reanalysis from nominal to verbal stems is proposed.
Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2017
The Spanish spoken the State of Yucatán, México has long been suspected of featuring extensive influence from a 500 year history of contact with Yucatec Maya, the indigenous language of the region (Klee & Lynch 2009; Lope Blanch, 1987; Mediz Bolio, 1951). Most of the research documenting language contact interference features addresses the socio-phonetic features of Yucatán Spanish that are either directly or indirectly a result of language contact and bilingualism (Michnowicz 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011; Yager 1982). In this paper, I analyze a set of hybrid verb forms commonly re hacer + where a root form of a Yucatec Maya verb creates a complex predicate with the Spanish verb hacer 'to make or to do'.
Standing divided: dispositional predicates and locative predications in two Mayan languages
The Mayan languages Tzeltal and Yucatec have large form classes of ‘dispositional’ roots which lexicalize spatial properties such as orientation, support/suspension/blockage of motion, and configurations of parts of an entity with respect to other parts. But speakers of the two languages deploy this common lexical resource quite differently. The roots are used in both languages to convey dispositional information (e.g., answering ‘how’- questions), but Tzeltal speakers also use them in canonical locative descriptions (e.g., answering ‘where’-questions), whereas Yucatec speakers only use dispositionals in locative predications when prompted by the context to focus on dispositional properties. We describe the constructions used in locative and dispositional descriptions in response to two different picture stimuli sets. Evidence against the proposal that Tzeltal uses dispositionals to compensate for its single, semantically generic preposition (Brown 1994; Grinevald 2006) comes from the finding that Tzeltal speakers use relational spatial nominals in the ‘ground phrase’ – the expression of the place at which an entity is located – about as frequently as Yucatec speakers. We consider several alternative hypotheses, including a possible larger typological difference that leads Tzeltal speakers, but not Yucatec speakers, to prefer ‘theme-specific’ verbs not just in locative predications, but in any predication involving a theme argument.
Nominalized antipassive constructions in Kaqchikel (Mayan)
Proceedings of the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas 24 (ed. by D. K. E. Reisinger and Hannah Green), 2023
The paper examines Voice transformations under event -ik nominalization in Kaqchikel (a Mayan language, ergative) presenting a previously undescribed puzzle: in a variety of Kaqchikel spoken in Patzún, Guatemala, antipassive in deverbal -ik nominals patterns with passive promoting an internal argument instead of the external one, unlike in finite clauses where the external argument survives antipassivization. To account for this peculiar behavior, I adopt Ranero’s (2019) analysis for antipassive, whereby it is not a voice but a realization of the v head in the absence of VoiceP.