Bystanders in Bullying: Do ToM and Social Competence Skills Play a Role? (original) (raw)

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating: (a) the direct effects of Theory of Mind (ToM) on elementary school children's self-reports of participant roles in school bullying, (b) ToM's indirect effects via self-reported social competence skills. Gender was examined as moderator. A total of 171 elementary school children (Ν = 95 girls) from 3 rd to 6 th grade from Greek public schools participated in the study. Participants were examined individually through the administration of advanced ToM stories. Also, they were asked to complete in groups self-report questionnaires as regards their roles as bystanders in bullying situations and their social competence skills. Path analysis indicated significant positive direct effects of ToM on prosocial skills and defending behavior and a negative effect on assisting/reinforcing behavior. Significant indirect effects were found from ToM on bystanding behavior, via its direct effect on prosocial competence skills. Gender was not a significant moderator of the above relations.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (51)

  1. Andreou, E., & Metallidou, P. (2004).The relationship of academic and social cognition to behavior in bullying situations among Greek primary school children. Educational Psychology, 24, 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000146421
  2. Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence -Empathy = Aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00029-9
  3. Banerjee, R., Watling, D., & Caputi, M. (2011). Peer relations and the understanding of faux pas: Longitudinal evidence for bidirectional associations. Child Development, 82, 1887-1905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01669.x
  4. Barlow, A., Qualter, P., & Styllianou, M. (2010).Relationships between Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and theory of mind in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.021
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023035012436
  6. Baxevani, M., &Metallidou, P. (2015). Primary school children's Theory of Mind as predictor of self-reported bullying and victimization: The moderating role of empathy and social competence [in Greek].
  7. In M. Kosmides, D. Xanthopoulou, E. Aretouli, & E. Gonida (Eds.), Scientific Annals of School of Psychology, A.U.Th. (Vol. XI, pp. 84-117).
  8. Camodeca, M., Caravita, S. C. S., & Coppola, G. (2015). Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference.Aggressive Behavior, 41, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21541
  9. Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Longitudinal effects of Theory of Mind on later peer relations: The role of Prosocial Behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025402
  10. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x
  11. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescent's participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 138-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609342983
  12. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
  13. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149
  14. Devy, R. T., White, N., Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52, 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000105
  15. Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., & Samuelsson, M. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: Fourth to seventh grade students' perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education, 29, 557-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.878375
  16. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
  17. Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What's wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20153
  18. Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents' active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002
  19. Goudas, M., Magotsiou, E., & Hatzigeorgiadis, A. (2009). Factor invariance of two forms of the "Multisource Assessment of Children's Social Competence Scale" [in Greek].
  20. In A. Mprouzos, P. Misailidi, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Scientific Annals of the Psychological Society of Northern Greece (Vol. 7, pp. 96-114). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
  21. Happe, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129-154.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
  22. Hughes, C., Adlam, A., Happe, F., Jackson, J., Taylor, A., & Caspi, A. (2000). Good test-retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00633
  23. Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 590-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00285.x
  24. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? Journal of Adolescence, 34, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001
  25. Junttila, N., Voeten, M., Kaukiainen, A., &Vauras, M. (2006). Multisource assessment of children's social jedp.ccsenet.org Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology Vol. 8, No. 2; 2018 competence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 874-895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405285546
  26. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901\_4
  27. Maunder, R. E., & Crafter, S. (2018). School bullying from a sociocultural perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.010
  28. Miller, S. A. (2009). Children's understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 749-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016854
  29. Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
  30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998-2007). Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén&Muthén.
  31. O´Hare, A. E., Bremmer, L., Nash, M., Happe, F., & Pettigrew, L. M. (2009). A clinical assessment tool for advanced theory of mind performance in 5 to 12 year olds. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 916-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0699-2
  32. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
  33. Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., &Thornberg, R. (2016). Bullying and defending behavior: The role of explicit and implicit moral cognition. Journal of School Psychology, 59, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.005
  34. Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., De Mey, L., & Willemen, A. M. (2013). Children's intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 669-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002
  35. Renouf. A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., ... Seguin, J. R. (2010). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten: Evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 19, 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00586.x
  36. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14
  37. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent behavior, 15, 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
  38. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
  39. Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
  40. Shakoor, S., Jaffee, S. R., Bowes, L., Ouellet-Morin, I., Andreou, P., Happe, F., ...Arseneault, L. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children's theory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02488.x
  41. Smith, P. K. (2017). Bullying and Theory of Mind: A Review. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 13, 90-95. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573400513666170502123214
  42. Stavrinides, P., Georgiou, S., & Theofanous, V. (2010). Bullying and empathy: A short-term longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 30, 793-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.506004
  43. Sullivan, K., Zaitchik, D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.395
  44. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a social process: An adaptation of the Participant Role Scale approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<97::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-7
  45. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and 'Theory of Mind': A critique of the 'social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00083
  46. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165384
  47. Van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., Salmivali, C., &Veenstra, R. (2017). Defending victims: What does it make to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers? Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002
  48. Van Noorden, T.H.J., Haselager, G.J.T., Cillessen, A.H.N., & Bukowski, W.M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0135-6
  49. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., &Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and Victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.672
  50. Warden, D., & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problems-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322277757
  51. Wellman, H., M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304