An Analysis of the Feasibility of Implementing a Single Rate Sales Tax (original) (raw)
2000, National Tax Journal
The National Tax Association's project on the taxation of telecommunications and electronic commerce recommended that each state employing a sales and use tax consider adopting a single statewide rate rather than continue with the number of rates currently in use. This recommendation was made in response to the criticism that current state sales and use tax schemes are too complex to expect multi-state vendors to collect and remit the sales tax in thousands of state and local jurisdictions. This article reviews the history of single rate suggestions and the problems for state and local governments that are expected to develop under such a proposal. The feasibility of adopting such a policy in five states, California, Georgia, New York, Tennessee, and Utah, is analyzed. The results of the examination reveal that the proposal is administratively feasible and simplification could be achieved. In some states the adoption of a single rate would result in modest tax revenue shifts, but in others the revenue readjustments would be significant. All states would face sizable political obstacles to a single rate proposal. We conclude that states should consider using a single rate for use tax collections and continue the use of multiple rates for in-state sales tax collections. Regardless, states must actively pursue polices to simplify their current tax processes at every opportunity.
Related papers
Rethinking State and Local Reliance on the Retail Sales Tax: Should We Fix the State Sales Tax or Di
2000
Institution. 1. Initially, while describing and discussing principles and problems of taxation, I refer only to "sales tax," rather than to "sales and use tax." Where necessary I distinguish between sales taxes and use taxes. The meaning should be clear from context. I employ the terms "remote commerce" and "electronic commerce" to refer to commerce that crosses state or national boundaries. 2.
E-Commerce in the Context of Declining State Sales Tax Bases
National Tax Journal, 2000
This paper extends the quantitative estimates of sales tax revenue losses from electronic commerce in a variety of ways. First, we place the effects of e-commerce in the context of general sales tax base trends, arguing that e-commerce is only one of the factors reducing sales tax bases. Second, we take a forward looking view, estimating both the current losses and the expected losses several years hence. Third, we estimate the revenue-neutral increases in state sales tax rates that will become necessary to offset the base declines. Revenue loss estimates are prepared for every state with a sales tax. Our baseline estimates suggest that e-commerce will cause about $10.8 billion in additional tax revenue losses nationwide in 2003.
State and Local Sales Taxes and Business Activity in the United States
SSRN Electronic Journal
State and Local Sales Taxes and Business Activity in the United States There has been an increasing reliance on sales taxation in both the states and counties in the United States. In this paper, we are examining the relationship between state and local sales taxation and business activity in the U.S. by utilizing county-level data for the period 2002-2011. We have found significant negative association between the state and county combined sales tax rate and annual payroll of businesses particularly in the manufacturing sector. There is also evidence of spatial dependence particularly in the payroll response of businesses within the contiguous region. While we found no significant relationship with employment, there is also statistically significant negative association with retail establishments and small establishments with less than 10 employees. It is possible that businesses respond to a sales tax rate increase first, or more directly, by reducing payroll rather than employment. While the economic significance of these results, however, is not found to be overwhelmingly strong, policymakers should still pay attention particularly to how manufacturing businesses respond to sales tax rate tax changes in the form of changes in payroll, and the responses from the small retail establishments.
2002
Under current U.S. law, taxpayers can deduct up to 100 percent of their state income taxes from their adjusted gross income when calculating their federal income taxes. As a result, Iowans currently pay approximately 251millionlesstothefederalgovernmentthantheywouldotherwisepay.Thereis,however,noequivalentstipulationallowingforthedeductionofstatesalestaxes.Consequently,byeliminatingthesalestaxandreplacingthelostrevenuewithanincome−basedtax,IowanscouldsaveasubstantialamountofmoneyontheirfederaltaxreturnswithoutanychangeinrevenuefortheIowagovernment.Alternatively,byreplacingthesalestaxwithanincome−basedtax,theStateofIowacouldincreaseitstaxrevenuewithoutincreasingthetotaltaxburdenonIowans.Thisanalysisdiscussesfourspecificscenarios,withnetbenefitstoIowansrangingfrom251 million less to the federal government than they would otherwise pay. There is, however, no equivalent stipulation allowing for the deduction of state sales taxes. Consequently, by eliminating the sales tax and replacing the lost revenue with an income-based tax, Iowans could save a substantial amount of money on their federal tax returns without any change in revenue for the Iowa government. Alternatively, by replacing the sales tax with an income-based tax, the State of Iowa could increase its tax revenue without increasing the total tax burden on Iowans. This analysis discusses four specific scenarios, with net benefits to Iowans ranging from 251millionlesstothefederalgovernmentthantheywouldotherwisepay.Thereis,however,noequivalentstipulationallowingforthedeductionofstatesalestaxes.Consequently,byeliminatingthesalestaxandreplacingthelostrevenuewithanincome−basedtax,IowanscouldsaveasubstantialamountofmoneyontheirfederaltaxreturnswithoutanychangeinrevenuefortheIowagovernment.Alternatively,byreplacingthesalestaxwithanincome−basedtax,theStateofIowacouldincreaseitstaxrevenuewithoutincreasingthetotaltaxburdenonIowans.Thisanalysisdiscussesfourspecificscenarios,withnetbenefitstoIowansrangingfrom106 million to $157 million per year.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.