Value in Education: Its Web of Social Forms (original) (raw)
Related papers
Capital as power and the corporatisation of education
Building on the definition of critical education residing in the crossroads of cultural politics and political economy, this theoretical article offers an inquiry into the intersection between critical education research and the central ritual of contemporary capitalism - capitalisation.
Capitalism in the Classroom: The Commodification of Education
Routes is committed to creating outlets for critical social research and interdisciplinary inquiry. Alternate Routes works closely with scholars, labour, community and social justice researchers to promote the publication of heterodox critical social research in all its forms, as well as provocative and progressive analyses that may not find a forum in conventional academic venues. Alternate Routes seeks to be a public academic journal and encourages works that advance or challenge theoretical, historical and contemporary socio-political, economic and cultural issues. In addition to full-length articles, we welcome review essays sparked by previously published material, interviews, commentaries, book reviews as well as poetry, drawings and photo-essays.
Value production and struggle in the classroom: Teachers within, against and beyond capital
Capital & Class, 2006
To the extent that their labour produces value and surplus value, teachers are productive labourers. This paper discusses teachers' labour in relation to the production of new labour power, explores the extent to which it is alienated, and explains how it produces surplus value. But the classroom is also a site of struggle. The paper explores some of the ways in which teachers and students may both refuse capitalist work and create space in order to pursue alternative projects that better meet their own needs. To this extent, teachers and students are productive, not of value, but of struggle.
The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2007
In this paper, we explore educational inequality through a theoretical and empirical analysis. We use classical Marxian scholarship and class-based analyses to theorise the relationship between education and the inequality in society that is an inevitable feature of capitalist society/ economy. The relationship between social class and the process of capitalization of education in the USA and UK is identified, where neo-liberal drivers are working to condition the education sector more tightly to the needs of capital. The empirical evidence is utilised to show how capital accumulation is the principal objective of national and international government policy, and of global capitalist organizations such as the World Trade Organization. The key ontological claim of Marxist education theorists is that education serves to complement, regiment and replicate the dominant-subordinate nature of class relations upon which capitalism depends, the labor-capital relation. Through these argument...
Pedagogical Labor in an Age of Devalued Reproduction
Mass Intellectuality and Democratic Leadership in Higher Education , 2017
This chapter explores the connections between shifts in labor, pedagogy and the dynamics of network culture. It suggests that the previous role of education as an avenue of class advancement has been undermined by the current transformations of neoliberal capitalism, thus leaving education in precarious position needing to justify what it produces. From that an argument is made that a critique starts from a reflexive understanding of its position within broader processes of social production, and thus the necessity for rethinking what kinds of learning are already occurring within existing flows of immaterial and free labor. Acknowledging and working from shared conditions of precarity creates the possibility of rebuilding a new form of labor-pedagogical politics. Paul Willis in his classic book Learning to Labor (1982) describes the way that it is precisely the rejection of education by working class British lads that slots them into their continued role as future factory workers. By refusing knowledges and skills within education, and the opportunity for advancement offered through such, the lads refusal means that they have little other choice than taking the low-skilled, low paying factory jobs. What we see here is a kind of refusal of pedagogical labor, of academic achievement, which ends up forming the lads for their place in the working of the economy: the reproduction of the class relationship. In considering the relation between labor and pedagogy it is key to that while the institutional space in which formalized teaching occurs is indeed a prime space for how that relation is formed, it is far from the only site this occurs. This is what someone like Tiziana Terranova points toward in her exploration of labor involved in the functioning of what she describes at “network culture” (2004). For Terranova this means that various information technologies, from mass media to the Internet, interactive and participatory media, have congealed together into one integrated media system. Terranova argues that such an integrated network culture can only function through an immense supply of the “free labor” of participation, which can range anywhere from the building of websites and running of listservs, to generating content through social networking sites, to writing open source code. This essay will explore the pedagogical function of these dispersed forms of free labor, which occur throughout the social field, and that are very much part of structuring the habitus of today’s student-workers. From compulsory engagement in social media to the expectations of taking on unpaid internships, today’s proletarian learns that they will only advance if they are willing to take part in an arrangement that demands the de-valuing of their labor as a necessary entrance cost of trying to claim any future value over its worth. The question of mass intellectuality thus attempts to reorient this conjunction of labor and pedagogy, to find ways to turn this dynamic of engagement with these very conditions as a step towards organizing to change them.
Education and the Tragedy of Labour
2020
The argument of this paper is that, insofar as education is tied to the social production of labour-power in capitalism, or is infused with the business takeover of education, then, by default, it is in a tragic condition. This argument is pursued in conjunction with an exploration of some aspects of the literature on tragedy. The tragedy of labour results from the opposition between labouring for value production and capital's profit system, and labouring for ourselves - individually and collectively - for human desires, needs and enhancement. Radical alternatives are required for the latter, otherwise education is doomed to be tied to capital's prerogatives. Draft: version of 25th June 2020.