Medical Researchers React to Peer Review: Attitudes towards and Challenges of Iranian Surgeons Publishing in English (original) (raw)
Related papers
Success in Getting Articles Published by Iranian Medical Researchers: The Role of English Language
The role of English as a medium of scholarly communication can be highlighted as a major barrier against publishing articles in international journals. This becomes more serious in EFL contexts like Iran whereas the use of English is remarkably limited. On the other hand, pressure from the higher education authorities has turned publishing articles to an inevitable duty of the faculty. This qualitative study was conducted in a major medical university in Iran, whereas four low-published and four rather high-published authors were interviewed for their story from doing research to getting published. Their strategies (either low or high published researchers) in getting their articles published in relation with the role of English writing are reported in three stages: pre-preparation, preparation and post-preparation sages. Finally, the results are summarized and suggestions are made.
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
Research integrity and peer review, 2018
Despite rapid growth of the scientific literature, no consensus guidelines have emerged to define the optimal criteria for editors to grade submitted manuscripts. The purpose of this project was to assess the peer reviewer metrics currently used in the surgical literature to evaluate original manuscript submissions. Manuscript grading forms for 14 of the highest circulation general surgery-related journals were evaluated for content, including the type and number of quantitative and qualitative questions asked of peer reviewers. Reviewer grading forms for the seven surgical journals with the higher impact factors were compared to the seven surgical journals with lower impact factors using Fisher's exact tests. Impact factors of the studied journals ranged from 1.73 to 8.57, with a median impact factor of 4.26 in the higher group and 2.81 in the lower group. The content of the grading forms was found to vary considerably. Relatively few journals asked reviewers to grade specific ...
Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 2021
Introduction: Peer review is vital to the scientific publishing process. However, the present system has been criticized and accused of bias, lack of transparency, and failure to detect significant breakthroughs. Peer reviewers usually work pro bono, and their efforts are not formally acknowledged. Some journals have difficulty finding appropriate reviewers who can complete timely reviews, resulting in significant publication delay. Materials and Methods: An online survey of a convenience sample of clinicians and biomedical scientists from the Middle East (107) and Africa (69) was conducted to explore why reviewers decline to review and to ascertain their opinions on reviewer incentives. Items were scored on 5-point Likert scales, with low scores indicating low importance or low agreement. Results: One hundred and seventy two respondents provided adequate responses for analysis. Factors rated most highly in importance for the decision to accept to review a paper included contributio...
A Qualitative Research on Being an Author, Reviewer and Editor in the Scholarly Publication Process
Gümüşhane üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri dergisi, 2024
This study aims to reveal the essence a group of health sciences academics' experience in producing scholarly publications. In this study conducted with the qualitative phenomenological approach, a set of predetermined criteria were used to select the participants for inclusion in the study group. Thus, the criterion-based sampling method, one of the purposive sampling methods, was used in this study. A semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used as a data collection tool. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with the participants. Upon observing data saturation, the data collection process was ended. 12 academics were included in this study. After the interview records were transcribed by the researchers, they were all transferred to the MAXQDA 2022 program, through which coding and thematic analyses were performed. Regarding the scholarly publication process, the themes titled as "authoring", "peer reviewing", "editing",n"publication ethics", "dissatisfaction," and "suggestions" emerged in the analysis of the data.
Learned Publishing, 2016
This article reports a study into 60 research articles (RAs) authored by Iranian medical researchers and published in high-quality international English journals. It investigated how academic professionals in medical sciences implement peer convenience editing (CE) to improve articles and make them suitable for publication. The research identified nine editing interventions that were categorized as micro-or macro-editing strategies. The findings indicated that the most frequently used strategies are microstrategies of substitution, addition, and mechanical alteration. The study also found that the abstract received the majority of editorial changes (mostly micro), followed by the introduction and then the discussion sections. The findings may help authors and institutions identify which sections and which types of editorial interventions are most likely to be required to ensure that RAs are optimized for publishing in international journals. INTRODUCTION Nowadays, publishing research articles (RAs) in international journals has become an inevitably required task for professionals in order to progress in their academic majors (Livnat, 2012; Mur-Duenas, 2012; Tahririan & Sadri, 2013). Meanwhile, journals have taken tougher measures to define stricter criteria for accepting or rejecting manuscripts (MSs) (Mungra & Webber, 2010). One of those criteria is that RAs need to possess native-like English in terms of academic writing and publication standards (Belcher, 2007; Li & Flowerdew, 2007). What is more, non-native English-speaking (NNES) authors in scientific fields experience great difficulties in observing these language standards (Belcher, 2007; Curry & Lillis, 2004; Hanauer & Englander, 2011). This primarily indicates the importance of developing publication literacy by NNES scholars to navigate this high-stake activity (Tahririan & Sadri, 2013). Secondly, it places special emphasis on the facilitative role of 'text shapers' (Burrough-Boenisch, 2003), 'literacy brokers' (Lillis & Curry, 2006), or 'convenience editors' (Willey & Tanimoto, 2012). By definition, text shapers refer to authors-editors, local editors, correctors, language professionals, revisers, and language service providers (Burrough-Boenisch, 2003); in a similar vein, literacy brokers are academic professionals, language professionals, and nonprofessionals (Lillis & Curry, 2006). English as a Foreign Language (EFL)/English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers who are familiar with specific genres and can edit to meet the publication and language requirements of international journals could also provide convenience editing services (Willey & Tanimoto, 2012). Throughout this article, we use the term convenience editors to define all text shapers, including peer field specialists who voluntarily supply editing and language polishing assistance to authors other than themselves regardless of their academic affiliations. CE is restricted to language-oriented editing and modifications in terms of form and organization addressing grammar, vocabulary, spelling, punctuation, style, and genre features in order to improve the MS as noted by Bisaillon (2005, cited in Bisaillon, 2007). We do not include personal redrafting, revising,
Collegium antropologicum
The objective of this survey was to identify the importance placed by Croatian-based surgeons on writing scientific manuscripts and publishing them internationally, as well as their awareness of and attitudes toward medical writing. A link to an online survey was sent to 327 Croatian-based orthopedic and trauma surgeons. The electronic questionnaire consisted of rating scales, multiple choice questions and free text reply boxes. A total of 61 surgeons based in Croatia replied to the survey, yielding a response rate of 19% (61/327). The survey results indicate that surgeons in Croatia are active in both research and the writing of manuscripts. There is also a high level of interest among them to publish internationally in English to further their careers. While 68% (38/56) of respondents initially claimed to know about medical writing, further questioning on the subject revealed a reduced level of familiarity with the concept. Only 19% (11/58) of respondents had ever engaged the serv...