Prolactin Induces Apoptosis of Lactotropes in Female Rodents (original) (raw)
Related papers
Endocrine, 2003
In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that unmodified prolactin (U-PRL) and phosphorylated prolactin (P-PRL) have differential roles in the autoregulation of PRL secretion in vivo. Recombinant human U-PRL and a molecular mimic of P-PRL (S179D PRL) were administered to male rats and to female rats in different physiological states and the effect on rat PRL release was measured. Administration of U-PRL elevated rat PRL in all female animals, but was without effect in males. By contrast, S179D PRL was inactive in females, but inhibited PRL release in males. Morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated acidophil hypertrophy and evidence of increased PRL secretion in the pituitaries of U-PRL-treated females. Analysis of the two forms of PRL during prolactinoma induction in two differentially susceptible strains of rats found a strong temporal correlation among increased ratios of U-PRL: P-PRL, increased circulating PRL, and increased cell proliferation. We conclude (1) that the autoregulatory mechanism(s) can distinguish between the two major forms of PRL and that higher proportions of U-PRL not only allow for higher circulating levels of PRL, but are also autostimulatory, (2) that the autoregulatory mechanism(s) are set differently in males and females such that females are more sensitive to autostimulation by U-PRL and less sensitive to inhibition by P-PRL, and (3) that U-PRL and P-PRL may also have differential roles in the regulation of pituitary cell proliferation.
Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2002
Human lactotroph adenomas (prolactinomas) are the most frequent functioning pituitary tumors (1), but their pathogenesis remains elusive. The primary regulation of prolactin (PRL) secretion is mediated by the inhibitory effects of dopamine released from the median eminence of the hypothalamus and acting at the dopamine D2 receptor subtype (D2R) (2). Mice deficient in the D2R receptor (Drd2 -/mice) have previously been shown to develop hyperprolactinemia, lactotroph hyperplasia, and prolactinomas (3, 4), confirming a crit-ical role of hypothalamic dopamine and dopamine receptor activation in the physiologic regulation of lactotroph proliferation and PRL secretion. However, the involvement of a number of other regulatory factors has been postulated, including PRL itself (5). PRL increases hypothalamic-pituitary dopamine tone, i.e., constitutive inhibitory signaling by the D2R, and decreases PRL secretion (6-8) by altering the expression (9) and activity (7) of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis.
Genetic Analysis: Biomolecular Engineering, 1999
Prolactin (PRL), a polypeptide hormone secreted mainly by the pituitary and, to a lesser extent, by peripheral tissues, affects more physiological processes than all other pituitary hormones combined since it is involved in \ 300 separate functions in vertebrates. Its main actions are related to lactation and reproduction. The initial step of PRL action is the binding to a specific membrane receptor, the PRLR, which belongs to the class 1 cytokine receptor superfamily. PRL-binding sites have been identified in a number of tissues and cell types in adult animals. Signal transduction by this receptor is mediated, at least in part, by two families of signaling molecules: Janus tyrosine kinases and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs). Disruption of the PRLR gene has provided a new mouse model with which to identify actions directly associated with PRL or any other PRLR ligands, such as placental lactogens. To date, several different phenotypes have been analyzed and are briefly described in this review. Coupled with the SAGE technique, this PRLR knockout model is being used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the expression pattern of hepatic genes in two physiological situations: transcriptomes corresponding to livers from both wild type and PRLR KO mice are being compared, and following statistical analyses, candidate genes presenting a differential profile will be further characterized. Such a new approach will undoubtedly open future avenues of research for PRL targets. To date, no pathology linked to any mutation in the genes encoding PRL or its receptor have been identified. The development of genetic models provides new opportunities to understand how PRL can participate to the development of pathologies throughout life, as for example the initiation and progression of breast cancer. (V. Goffin) 1050-3862/99/$ -see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 1 0 5 0 -3 8 6 2 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 2 5 -X
Endocrinology, 2020
Differentiation of the hormone-producing cells of the pituitary represents an informative model of cell fate determination. The generation and maintenance of 2 pituitary lineages, the growth hormone (GH)-producing somatotropes and the prolactin (PRL)-producing lactotropes, are dependent on the pituitary-specific transcription factor, POU1F1. While POU1F1 is expressed in both cell types, and plays a role in activation of both the Gh and Prl genes, expression of Gh and Prl is restricted to somatotropes and lactotropes, respectively. These observations imply the existence of additional factors that contribute to the somatotrope and lactotrope identities and their hormone expressions. Prior transcriptome analysis of primary somatotropes and lactotropes isolated from the mouse pituitary identified enrichment of a transcription factor, Nr4a2, in the lactotropes. Nr4a2 was shown in a cell culture model to bind the Prl promoter at a position adjacent to Pou1f1 and to synergize with Pou1f1 in driving Prl transcription. Here we demonstrate in vivo the role of Nr4a2 as an enhancer of Prl expression by conditional gene inactivation of the Nr4a2 gene in mouse lactotropes. We demonstrate that nuclear orphan receptor transcription factor (NR4A2) binding at the Prl promoter is dependent on actions of POU1F1; while POU1F1 is essential to loading polymerase (Pol) II on the Prl promoter, Nr4a2 plays a role in enhancing Pol II release into the Prl gene body. These studies establish an in vivo role of Nr4a2 in enhancing Prl expression in mouse lactotropes, explore its mechanism of action, and establish a system for further study of the lactotrope lineage in the pituitary. (Endocrinology 161: 1-11, 2020)
Biology of Reproduction, 2008
The anterior pituitary-derived hormone prolactin (PRL) signals through the PRL receptor (PRLR) and is important for female reproductive function in mammals. In contrast to the extensive studies of PRLR expression and regulation in human and mouse ovary and uterus, the mechanisms controlling the regulation of PRLR isoform expression in the fallopian tube are poorly understood. Because dynamic interaction of hormonal signaling in gonadal tissue and the pituitary or in gonadal tissues themselves in mammals suggests endocrine or paracrine regulation of PRLR expression, we questioned whether differential regulation of PRLR isoforms by PRL ovarian-derived estrogen (E 2 ) and progesterone (P 4 ) exists in the fallopian tube and pituitary of prepubertal female mice. Western blot analysis showed distinct molecular separation of PRLR isoforms in mouse and human fallopian tubes, and cellular localization was found in mouse and human tubal epithelia but not in mouse tubal smooth muscle cells. These data support the concept of an isoform-and cell type-specific expression of PRLR in human and mouse fallopian tubes. Moreover, expression of the long form of PRLR decreased after PRL treatment and increased after blockage of endogenous PRL secretion by bromocriptine (an inhibitor of PRL secretion) in a time-dependent manner in mouse fallopian tube. The opposite regulation was observed in the pituitary. Treatment with exogenous E 2 or P 4 led to changes in PRLR expression in the fallopian tube similar to those of PRL treatment. However, E 2 and P 4 did not affect PRLR expression in the pituitary. Estrogen had no effect on the long form of PRLR expression, whereas P 4 regulated the long form of PRLR in the fallopian tube, as did PRL. Taken together, the data from our comparative study provide evidence that PRLR can be regulated by an interplay of two different mechanisms, PRL or ovarian steroid hormones independently or in combination in a tissuespecific manner. Furthermore, we found that ovarian steroid hormones selectively suppress the expression of PRLR isoforms in mouse fallopian tubes. These findings may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms controlling PRLR isoform expression in the fallopian tube (in addition to ovary and uterus), with implications for female reproduction.
The anterior pituitary-derived hormone prolactin (PRL) signals through the PRL receptor (PRLR) and is important for female reproductive function in mammals. In contrast to the extensive studies of PRLR expression and regulation in human and mouse ovary and uterus, the mechanisms controlling the regulation of PRLR isoform expression in the fallopian tube are poorly understood. Because dynamic interaction of hormonal signaling in gonadal tissue and the pituitary or in gonadal tissues themselves in mammals suggests endocrine or paracrine regulation of PRLR expression, we questioned whether differential regulation of PRLR isoforms by PRL ovarian-derived estrogen (E 2) and progesterone (P 4) exists in the fallopian tube and pituitary of prepubertal female mice. Western blot analysis showed distinct molecular separation of PRLR isoforms in mouse and human fallopian tubes, and cellular localization was found in mouse and human tubal epithelia but not in mouse tubal smooth muscle cells. These data support the concept of an isoform-and cell type-specific expression of PRLR in human and mouse fallopian tubes. Moreover, expression of the long form of PRLR decreased after PRL treatment and increased after blockage of endogenous PRL secretion by bromocriptine (an inhibitor of PRL secretion) in a time-dependent manner in mouse fallopian tube. The opposite regulation was observed in the pituitary. Treatment with exogenous E 2 or P 4 led to changes in PRLR expression in the fallopian tube similar to those of PRL treatment. However, E 2 and P 4 did not affect PRLR expression in the pituitary. Estrogen had no effect on the long form of PRLR expression, whereas P 4 regulated the long form of PRLR in the fallopian tube, as did PRL. Taken together, the data from our comparative study provide evidence that PRLR can be regulated by an interplay of two different mechanisms, PRL or ovarian steroid hormones independently or in combination in a tissue-specific manner. Furthermore, we found that ovarian steroid hormones selectively suppress the expression of PRLR isoforms in mouse fallopian tubes. These findings may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms controlling PRLR isoform expression in the fallopian tube (in addition to ovary and uterus), with implications for female reproduction.
Implications of Multiple Phenotypes Observed in Prolactin Receptor Knockout Mice
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 2001
The development of a mouse line deficient in the PRL receptor (PRLR) would be an ideal means to better understand the multiple functions of prolactin. We were worried initially that removal of the PRLR from the mouse genome might be lethal and were surprised to find this not to be the case. We identified numerous deficiencies in PRLR knockout (KO) animals. Female homozygous mice are completely infertile and lack normal mammary development, while hemizygotes are unable to lactate following their first pregnancy. PRLR KO males and females have markedly elevated (30- to 100-fold) serum prolactin levels and in some instances pituitary hyperplasia is present. Maternal behavior is severely affected in both hemizygous and heterozygous animals. Bone formation is reduced in young animals and adults (males and females). Recently, we noticed that older KO animals show a slight reduction in body weight which appears to be due to reduced abdominal fat deposition.