A component Markov regime‐switching autoregressive conditional range model (original) (raw)
Related papers
Volatility forecasting using threshold heteroskedastic models of the intra-day range
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2008
An effective approach for forecasting return volatility via threshold nonlinear heteroskedastic models of the daily asset price range is provided. The return is defined as the difference between the highest and lowest log intra-day asset price. A general model specification is proposed, allowing the intra-day high-low price range to depend nonlinearly on past information, or an exogenous variable such as US market information. The model captures aspects such as sign or size asymmetry and heteroskedasticity, which are commonly observed in financial markets. The focus is on parameter estimation, inference and volatility forecasting in a Bayesian framework. An MCMC sampling scheme is employed for estimation and shown to work well in simulation experiments. Finally, competing range-based and return-based heteroskedastic models are compared via out-of-sample forecast performance. Applied to six international financial market indices, the range-based threshold heteroskedastic models are well supported by the data in terms of finding significant threshold nonlinearity, diagnostic checking and volatility forecast performance under various volatility proxies.
2016
This paper compares and evaluates various generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) models in terms of their ability to forecast volatility and risk of Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE). Linear and nonlinear GARCH and Markov Regime-Switching GARCH (MRS-GARCH) models with normal and fat tails errors are employed to predict 1-day to 1-month ahead forecast of volatility and Value-at-Risk (VaR). The MRS-GARCH model is estimated with two regimes, representing periods of low and high volatility of stock returns. The MRS-GARCH- model for short horizon and EGARCH- model for long horizon are found to predict the volatility and risk of KSE better than the competing models.
Financial volatility forecasting with range-based autoregressive volatility model
Finance Research Letters, 2011
The classical volatility models, such as GARCH, are return-based models, which are constructed with the data of closing prices. It might neglect the important intraday information of the price movement, and will lead to loss of information and efficiency. This study introduces and extends the range-based autoregressive volatility model to make up for these weaknesses. The empirical results consistently show that the new model successfully captures the dynamics of the volatility and gains good performance relative to GARCH model.
A Range-Based GARCH Model for Forecasting Volatility
A new variant of the ARCH class of models for forecasting the conditional variance, to be called the Generalized AutoRegressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Parkinson Range (GARCH-PARK-R) model, is proposed. The GARCH-PARK-R model, utilizing the extreme values, is a good alternative to the “realized volatility” model which requires a large amount of intra-daily data that remain relatively costly and are not readily available. The estimates of the GARCH-PARK-R model are derived using the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation (QMLE). The results suggest that the GARCHPARK- R model is a good middle ground between intra-daily models, such as the realized volatility, and inter-daily models, such as the ARCH class. The forecasting performance of the models is evaluated using the daily Philippine Peso-U.S. Dollar exchange rate from January 1997 to December 2003.
2006
This paper compares the forecasting performance of the conditional autoregressive range (CARR) model with the commonly adopted GARCH model. We examine two major stock indices, FTSE 100 and Nikkei 225, by using the daily range data and the daily close price data over the period 1990 to 2000. Our results suggest that improvements of the overall estimation are achieved when the CARR models are used. Moreover, we find that the CARR model gives better volatility forecasts than GARCH, as it can catch the extra informational contents of the intra-daily price variations. Finally, we also find that the inclusion of the lagged return and the lagged trading volume can significantly improve the forecasting ability of the CARR models. Our empirical results further suggest the significant existence of a leverage effect in the U.K. and Japanese stock markets.
2012
This thesis focuses on forecasting the volatility of daily returns using a double Markov switching GARCH model with a skewed Student-t error distribution. The model was applied to individual shares obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). The Bayesian approach which uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo was used to estimate the unknown parameters in the model. The double Markov switching GARCH model was compared to a GARCH(1,1) model. Value at risk thresholds and violations ratios where computed leading to the ranking of the GARCH and double Markov switching GARCH models. The results showed that double Markov switching GARCH model performs similarly to the GARCH model based on the ranking technique employed in this thesis.
EWS-GARCH: New Regime Switching Approach to Forecast Value-at-Risk
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2016
In the study, the two-step EWS-GARCH models to forecast Value-at-Risk is presented. The EWS-GARCH allows different distributions of returns or Value-at-Risk forecasting models to be used in Value-at-Risk forecasting depending on a forecasted state of the financial time series. In the study EWS-GARCH with GARCH(1,1) and GARCH(1,1), with the amendment to the empirical distribution of random errors as a Value-at-Risk model in a state of tranquillity and empirical tail, exponential or Pareto distributions used to forecast Value-at-Risk in a state of turbulence were considered. The evaluation of Value-at-Risk forecasts was based on the Value-at-Risk forecasts and the analysis of loss functions. Obtained results indicate that EWS-GARCH models may improve the quality of Value-at-Risk forecasts generated using the benchmark models. However, the choice of best assumptions for the EWS-GARCH model should depend on the goals of the Value-at-Risk forecasting model. The final selection may depend on an expected level of adequacy, conservatism and costs of the model.
Romanian Journal for Economic Forecasting, 2010
This paper compares several statistical models for daily stock return volatility in terms of sample fit and out-of-sample forecast ability. The focus is on US and Romanian daily stock return data corresponding to the 2002-2010 time interval. We investigate the presence of leverage effects in empirical time series and estimate different asymmetric GARCH-family models (EGACH, PGARCH and TGARCH) specifying successively a Normal, Student's t and GED error distribution. We find that GARCH family models with normal errors are not ...
Volatility Forecasts: A Continuous Time Model Versus Discrete Time MODELS1
Statistics and Econometrics Working Papers, 2006
This paper compares empirically the forecasting performance of a continuous time stochastic volatility model with two volatility factors (SV2F) to a set of alternative models (GARCH, FIGARCH, HYGARCH, FIEGARCH and Component GARCH). We use two loss functions and two out-of-sample periods in the forecasting evaluation. The two out-of-sample periods are characterized by different patterns of volatility. The volatility is rather low and constant over the first period but shows a significant increase over the second out-of-sample period. The empirical results evidence that the performance of the alternative models depends on the characteristics of the out-ofsample periods and on the forecasting horizons. Contrarily, the SV2F forecasting performance seems to be unaffected by these two facts, since the model provides the most accurate volatility forecasts according to the loss functions we consider.
Volatility forecasts: a continuous time model versus discrete time models
Nº.: UC3M Working Papers. Statistics and …, 2006
This paper compares empirically the forecasting performance of a continuous time stochastic volatility model with two volatility factors (SV2F) to a set of alternative models (GARCH, FIGARCH, HYGARCH, FIEGARCH and Component GARCH). We use two loss functions and two out-of-sample periods in the forecasting evaluation. The two out-of-sample periods are characterized by different patterns of volatility. The volatility is rather low and constant over the first period but shows a significant increase over the second out-of-sample period. The empirical results evidence that the performance of the alternative models depends on the characteristics of the out-ofsample periods and on the forecasting horizons. Contrarily, the SV2F forecasting performance seems to be unaffected by these two facts, since the model provides the most accurate volatility forecasts according to the loss functions we consider.