Rediscovering governance behind right government practices. Democracy as basis, territorial development as result (original) (raw)
Related papers
Proceedings of IX SIBESA, 2008
These notes are meant to discuss the analytical categories that will focus the discussion on the complex relation between the State and the Civil Society in the drawing up of the public environmental policies. Once there are distinct possibilities for the interpretation of the relationship, the Gramscian theoretical limit concept is run over, particularly its large notion of State and the correlate concept of hegemony. This extrapolates the conception of State-strength 1 , leading to the notion of 'moral and intellectual conduct of the society'. Still in the sphere of this conceptual limit, the concept of political project is incorporated to this debate that is present in Dagnino's works and can be translated by the notion of 'a conception of the world' as inspired by Gramscian's thought. Projects of society and political projects are therefore associated that are elements in permanent dispute inside the process of democratic construction. Last this discussion is related to what Wolff (2007) qualifies as the 'oblivion' in politics, the attempt to subordinate politics to technique and economics, the annulment of the public debate, that is to say the depoliticization of the public life.
Introducing the New Configuration Between State, Civil Society and the Market
P2P E INOVAÇÃO
ResumoNos atuais modos de funcionamento do mercado e do Estado, a sociedade civil não tem possibilidade de criar valor a partir de sua visão sobre o que é necessário para sua comunidade. Na lógica do mercado, bens e serviços são produzidos com o objetivo principal de obtenção de lucro e no Estado representativo os cidadãos não têm poder de decisão sobre as políticas públicas necessárias para suas cidades. Este artigo introduz a ideia do comum, que situa a noção de valor na criação colaborativa visando a resultados voltados para o coletivo. Em seguida, é apresentada a idéia de inteligência coletiva - aquela universalmente distribuída entre os seres humanos e que permite a criação de soluções inteligentes para problemas complexos; o documento sugere que o exercício dos valores do comum aprimora a inteligência coletiva. A partir das características da produção e governança peer, o artigo indica como cidades no mundo vêm sendo transformadas. Finalmente, a iniciativa Rio+ é apresentada c...
Governance, Authority and Social Change: an Ecosystem Approach
2021
Part of the literature about politics is dedicated to questions of authoritarianism, which, in the vision of the authors, would be a crescent menace to democratic regimes throughout the world. This is the point: democracy, in the paper, is different from what actually happens in the practice and can be even be the opposite. In the so called democratic societies, authoritarianism can be disguised in several manners, in the concepts of knowledge, culture, education, development, growth, wealth, work and freedom embedded in the market-place and in public institutions. Public policies ignore transformations priorities and the clashes between formal and informal institutions and elite agencies as critical junctures that lead to different outcomes. Free choice is restricted by the propaganda of products and life styles presented as the only alternative for a good life, notwithstanding the increasing cultural, educational, social and economic disparities.
"Governance – Role of Civil Society"
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R6SAK | ENRM Articles Personal Journal, University of the Philippines
This paper has been provided as part of global challenges, opinion and observation in the country and the role of civil society towards governance for sustainable ways and building capacity with a political will as well as the quality of good governance.
Governance – A Legal Perspective
2000
Access and water supply in today's world remains a universal problem. The Objectives of Sustainable Development (OSD) advocate a change in governance that allows for greater effectiveness in the management and use of water resources, in such a way as to ensure universal and non-discriminatory access, since this essential resource should not only to meet the direct needs of its users, but its proper management is capital to guarantee the sustainability of the Planet. In Spain, traditionally, the services of water supply have been offered by the municipalities, as entities territorially close to the citizenship, which allows them to know better the necessities of this group and, therefore, to respond to the same ones of effective and efficient way. but the European commitments made on climate change, as well as the growing concern for the environment in general and the crisis of management on water resources, in particular, oblige to revise the actions and the norms that regulate this sector. Consequently, combining the legal methodology with the DAFO analysis, the objective of this study is focused on knowing the legal norms that have been configuring the historical governance of water resources. In view of the results and despite international demands for the recognition of the human nature of the right to water, these investigations have not been reached on a legal level, as the legislation analysed deals with water as a resource not as a right. It is therefore necessary to implement a different way of governing, in which the participation of multiple actors in the formulation and execution of the political actions in water matters, to ensure adequate access and water supply to communities and citizens, as a safeguard of human dignity.
Towards a new system of environmental governance
The Environmentalist, 1993
Planning, the 'visible hand' of govemment, is the resource allocation sphere that has the potential to prevent destructive conflict over resources, by creating a long term, rational, ethics-based and participatory decision-making process. Other public decision-making systems (the market, legal and political arenas), by their very nature, cannot adequately protect the environment or ensure sustainable development. However, as presently conceived, Planning + cannot do so either. Reform has been impeded by an ideological bias which defines Planning as diametrically opposed to the market, such that creative alternatives to the two systems of social choice have not been developed. To address this problem, a new tripartite structure of environmental governance is proposed. Based on an ecofeminist paradigm, it is primarily designed to constrain the potential for the abuse of power, and allow society to address environmental (ethical) as well as social (distributional) and economic (efficiency) issues. In a sense, it 'rationalises" the social decision-making system by realigning rights, wants and needs with the appropriate decision-making forum (representative democracy, the market and Planning respectively). The model exposes the need to redesign all these institutions so tha t they better correspond to their logical functions within the resource allocation system. However, this paper focuses on the Planning system itself.