Hydro-responsive wound dressings for treating hard-to-heal wounds: a narrative review of the clinical evidence (original) (raw)

Hydro-responsive wound dressings for treating hard-to-heal wounds: a narrative review of the clinical evidence—part 2

Journal of Wound Care

This narrative clinical review summarises the key evidence in support for the use of a hydro-responsive wound dressing, HydroTac (HRWD-2, PAUL HARTMANN AG, Germany) to address key aspects associated with the treatment of both acute and hard-to-heal wounds. This review demonstrates how HRWD-2 can be used in general to address the challenges presented by a wide range of wound types and skin injuries. It highlights the ability of HRWD-2 to regulate an optimal moist wound environment that promotes wound progression and healing. Key aspects covered in this review include the dressing's ability to: promote certain phases of the wound healing response (for example, re-epithelialisation) address the concepts and needs for wound progression as set out in the TIME wound management framework provide an optimal hydration level reduce tissue trauma and pain at dressing change.

The clinical impact of hydroresponsive dressings in dynamic wound healing: Part I

Journal of Wound Care

Objective: Management of any wound, either acute or hard-to-heal, might involve the use of multiple and different wound dressings in its treatment. This approach is necessary to overcome the myriad of clinical challenges the wound presents, as well as any underlying comorbidities that might affect the clinical outcomes. This article describes the clinical effectiveness of a coordinated wound dressing treatment regimen. Method: This was an open-labelled non-comparative study involving patients with a variety of hard-to-heal and acute wounds of differing levels of severity, but all of which required removal of devitalised tissue to enable wound healing to progress. The first phase used the hydroresponsive wound dressing HydroClean (PAUL HARTMANN AG, Germany). The PUSH score was used as the primary measurement parameter. Results: A total of 86 patients (38 male/48 female), with a mean age of 67.7±21.7 years, took part in the study. The results showed that the hydroresponsive dressing w...

Hydro-responsive wound dressings simplify T.I.M.E. wound management framework

British journal of community nursing, 2016

The development of wound management protocols and guidelines such as the T.I.M.E. acronym are useful tools to aid wound care practitioners deliver effective wound care. The tissue, infection/inflammation, moisture balance and edge of wound (T.I.M.E.) framework provides a systematic approach for the assessment and management of the majority of acute and chronic wounds. The debridement of devitalised tissue from the wound bed, the reduction in wound bioburden and effective management of wound exudate - i.e., wound bed preparation - are barriers to wound healing progression that are targeted by T.I.M.E. There are a large number of wound dressings available to experienced wound care practitioners to aid in their goal of healing wounds. Despite the systematic approach of T.I.M.E., the large number of wound dressings available can introduce a level of confusion when dressing choices need to be made. Any simplification in dressing choice, for example by choosing a dressing system comprisin...

Wound fluid management in wound care: the role of a hydroconductive dressing

Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice, 2013

A case series was conducted to evaluate the clinical experience with a new hydroconductive wound dressing, that appears to help facilitate the removal of necrotic tissue and other deterrents to wound healing while preserving healthy granulation tissue in a wound. Eight patients were treated with the dressing which has a proprietary technology that draws fluid away from the wound. The dressing was used on a variety of wound types and all wounds went on to heal by secondary intention. There were no adverse effects noted by any patient in the case series. Larger patient studies are needed to corroborate the positive clinical results that were observed in this series of patients. .

Addressing the challenge of wound cleansing in the modern era

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)

Over the past two decades a body of evidence has been generated to support the traditional use of water in cleansing wounds, with studies showing that the use of clean water does not increase the risk of infection or delay healing. However, recent advances in the understanding of wound management have encouraged reforms and led to the development of wound cleansing agents that have the potential to improve clinical outcomes. This article draws on in vitro and in vivo evidence including comparative studies of patients with acute and chronic wounds to consider the evidence supporting alternatives to water in wound cleansing.

Clinical impact of an anti-biofilm Hydrofiber dressing in hard-to-heal wounds previously managed with traditional antimicrobial products and systemic antibiotics

Burns & Trauma

Background Hard-to-heal wounds are often compromised by the presence of biofilm. This presents an infection risk, yet traditional antimicrobial wound care products and systemic antibiotics are often used despite the uncertainty of therapeutic success and wound progression. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of a next-generation anti-biofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing (AQUACEL Ag+ Extra[AQAg+ E]) in hard-to-heal wounds that had previously been treated unsuccessfully with traditional silver-, iodine- or polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-containing dressings and products and/or systemic antibiotics. Methods Clinical case study evaluations of the anti-biofilm dressing were conducted, where deteriorating or stagnant wounds were selected by clinicians and primary dressings were replaced by the anti-biofilm dressing for up to 4 weeks, or as deemed clinically appropriate, with monitoring via case report forms. The data was stratified for cases where traditional sil...

Hydrogel Dressings: Multifunctional Solutions for Chronic Wound Healing; Focusing on In Vivo Studies

Journal of Lab Animal Research , 2023

Approximately, 1 to 2% of the population in developed countries suffer from chronic wounds. Nearly 6.5 million Americans have suffered at least one chronic wound. Chronic wound treatment is critical for patients to maintain their mental and physical well-being and improve their life quality. Chronic wounds can be treated in various ways, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy, debridement, ultrasound, skin grafts, negative pressure wound therapy, electromagnetic therapies, and hydrogel dressings. Hydrogels are among the most viable and promising options since their tunable characteristics, such as adhesiveness, antimicrobial and biodegradability, pre-angiogenic bioactivities, and anti-inflammatory, are beneficial to healing chronic wounds. In in vivo studies utilizing animal models, hydrogel dressings emerged as multifunctional solutions for chronic wound healing. These investigations consistently demonstrated that hydrogel dressings accelerated wound healing rates compared to traditional methods and maintained an optimal moist wound environment, which fostered tissue regeneration while minimizing scarring. Moreover, the remarkable biocompatibility of hydrogel dressings became evident in these animal model experiments, as they showed minimal adverse reactions in chronic wound patients. The results of these in vivo studies collectively highlight the promising potential of hydrogel dressings as a versatile therapeutic option for effectively managing chronic wounds. This review discusses dressings made of hydrogel in animal models for their multifunctional properties and potential benefits in treating chronic wounds. The efficacy of hydrogel dressings over other kinds of dressings is also demonstrated by providing examples of commercially available hydrogel dressings.