States vs. Non-State Actors: Asymmetric Conflict of the 21st Century and Challenges to Military Transformation (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE SITUATION REGARDING NON-STATE MILITARY ACTORS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
UFRGSMUN: UFRGS Model United Nations, 2014
The 21st century has seen an increase in the number of actions against the so-called non-state military actors, whose common features are: the fact of being organized groups operating outside state control; their use of force to achieve political objectives; the irregularity of its military actions, in opposition to the most common military doctrines of regular armies; among others. The Middle East, by its turn, is home of maybe the most important and internationally well-known non-state military actors of our time. Besides the wars triggered to fight the terrorist menace, against Al-Qaeda, for example, other non-state military actors have also been involved in conflicts, such as Hezbollah and Hamas. The UNSC, as guarantor of international security and peace, must address such pressing and polemic issue. This topic is relevant not only due to the high polarization that it involves-since one side tends to see all these groups as radical and terrorist actors at the same time that the other side claims the importance to differentiate between all kinds of such groups-but also by the fact that the UN must evaluate all the efforts that it have been taking in regard to non-state military actors, especially after this whole decade of conflicts involving the Middle East and these groups, also updating its approach to them in such region.
Civil-Military Relations in the Middle East
Arab Reform Initiative, 2016
vii Contents List of Figures and Tables viii Acknowledgements ix The Egyptian and the Turkish Militaries: Comparative Analysis 107 Conclusions and Policy Recommendations 138 Bibliography 157 Index 165 viii List of Figures and Tables I would never have been able to finish this work without the support of the Arab Reform Initiative in Paris and the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Denver's Josef Korbel School of International Studies, which have supported me academically and financially throughout this study. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my senior colleague Prof. Dina El Khawaga for her guidance, care, and patience, and for providing me with a suitable atmosphere in which to conduct this research. I would like to thank Dr. Yezid Sayigh and Prof. Dr. Nader Hashemi, whose research on and analyses of Middle Eastern affairs in general, and civil-military relations in particular, were highly informative. Special thanks go to Mr. Ahmed Hamdon, who helped me greatly with the data collection, data analysis, and drafting of this study. I would also like to thank Mr. Danny Postel, who assisted me in conducting interviews in the USA and kept me updated on all writings and events related to my field of study. I am incredibly grateful to Dr. Saban Kardas and Ms. Marwa Maziad, who made every possible effort to support my field research trip in Turkey; without their help, I would not have been able to complete this work in a proper fashion. I must also thank my dear and promising student Hend Amin for her help in drafting this work. I would like to thank my parents and two younger brothers, who have always supported me and encouraged me with their best wishes. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Mai Kafafy. She was always there to cheer me up and stood by me through the good times and the bad. Although the explanatory merit of such works is beyond doubt, they do little to explain the military's role in politics in less developed countries that are still transitioning to democracy. In such cases, civilian control has never existed, or was only ever a distant goal, given the military's privileged position. Unlike The Theory of Civil-Military Relations
NON-STATE ARMED GROUPs (NSAGs) IN THE MIDDLE EAST
This course provides students a broad introduction to contemporary regional and international security by focusing on the phenomenon of Non-State Armed Actors (NSAAs) in the MENA region. It surveys some of the major concepts, theories and knowledge in the area of IR, ISS, Political Geography, and Military Studies through and exploration of series of empirical puzzles. This includes an assessment of how the main perspectives of aforementioned disciplines provide insights into NSAAs phenomenon and the conditions for conflict and war. Throughout the seminar, students are encouraged to relate the conceptual themes addressed to their own research interests and agenda in the security and terrorism studies.
The Arab failed state phenomenon - Defence Review journal 0217.pdf
ABSTRACT: In our today international system, we cannot disconnect geographical and political dimensions any longer; the local cannot be disconnected from the regional and international. The international order is affected by local and distant disorders and chaotic situations, the atrocities conducted by ISIS in Syria and Iraq or the Somali pirates’ raids in the Red Sea are like the "Butterfly Effect" that begins in distant areas and ends with a tornado storm in Europe, America and East Asia. The international order of today is threatened by a spectrum of security threats as well as by migrations flow that begins in the turbulent Middle East and undermines European countries’ internal and societal order and endangers the fragile bond of the EU as such. These trends evoke a "Giants struggle" between Russia and the West (USA and its Western allies) begins in Syria and ends in Ukraine. Is it a common denominator for all these threats? Is there one major generator for them?
Palgrave Communications
This article presents a theoretical framework for a collection of articles ("special issue"), which aims at discussing the role of non-Arab state actors and non-state actors in a changing Middle East. The articles in the collection offer perspectives that have been overlooked in recent research, namely those focusing on the role of non-Arab state actors and non-state actors in connection with the changing security environment in the region. Furthermore, these articles discuss how changes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region are appearing in different and shifting contexts in the creation of new local, sub-regional, or regional security subcomplexes in which Arab states, non-Arab states and non-state actors enter into new conflicts, alliances and other political relations with and against each other. The role of international actors interfering in the region is also analyzed in the context of the changing Middle East.
IPRI Journal, 2015
The situation in the Middle East has become extremely precarious due to issues which can be traced back to the colonial era. Imprudently drawn state borders, unsettled disputes like Palestine and ethno-religious schisms accentuate the inter-state and intra-state rivalries which have spun out of control due to foreign interventions. Extremist radical Islam acquired new dimensions after 9/11 which consequently painted the 2003 Iraq war in ideological colours. A new trend of radicalization is visible across the region from Lebanon to Pakistan, which has resulted in the emergence of non-state actors. The raging conflict in and across the Middle East can only be pacified by devising regional strategies under international actors. Any further foreign intervention would have catastrophic consequences for the whole region.
Toward Defensive Restructuring in the Middle East
Project on Defense Alternatives DA Research Monograph #1, 1991
Examines the character of force structure and military conflict in the Middle East and outlines a nonoffensive defense posture for nations in the region. It also draws the implications of such a posture for arms transfers and arms control policy. An appendix reviews the pertinent lessons of the 1990-91 Gulf War. An edited version of this article appeared in the 01 April 1991 issue of The Bulletin of Peace Proposals (now Security Dialogue). Sections include: - Patterns and Parameters of War in the Region (Mideast, Persian Gulf, North Africa) - Principles of Non-offensive Defensive - Toward Self-contained and Stabilizing Defense Structures for the Region - The Defense of Saudi Arabia: Problems and Prospects - The Defense of Kuwait: Problems and Prospects - Implications for Arms Control Policy - Toward a Defensive Reorientation of the Arms Race - Negotiated Reductions in Offensive Capabilities - Implications for the Intervention Policies of the Major Powers - Reflections on the 1990-1991 Gulf War
Global politics in the 21st century : between regional cooperation and conflict, 2019
Barry Buzan and Ole Wæver’s description of the regional security complex in the Middle East (ME) emphasized the role of the region's states as key actors shaping its structure. The last decade has brought important developments in the ME at the level of the state (civil war in Syria), region (exacerbating Shi'ia-Sunni conflict) and global system (interventions of world powers in Syria, potential American intervention in Iran). New tendencies also included the growing significance of sub-state and transnational actors (the emergence of the so-called Islamic State, build-up of the military potential of Hezbollah and Kurdish organizations). The paper consists of two parts. The first one presents a description of the MERSC’s structure (power relations and patterns of amity and enmity) transformations over the last 15 years. It is an attempt to verify the hypothesis that the processes and events in recent years have brought significant and relatively stable new features to the structure. The second part focuses on the involvement of non-state actors and outside great powers in the region. Firstly, their role in shaping the aforementioned transformations of the MERC’s structure is assessed. Secondly, Buzan and Wæver’s claim that MERC’s structure is determined mainly by the state actors from within the region is revisited.
Foreign Policy Analysis and Armed Non-State Actors in World Politics: Lessons from the Middle East
Foreign Policy Analysis
The study of armed non-state actors (ANSAs) has grown exponentially in the last two decades. This article explores the foreign policy of ANSAs as a new empirical domain for foreign policy analysis (FPA) by drawing on various examples from the Middle East to show the merit of this area for novel empirical and theoretical studies. The article identifies the domain of ANSAs’ foreign policy showing how FPA research has so far remained state-centric and almost completely ignores ANSAs. While the external engagement of ANSAs were examined within the scholarship on civil wars, FPA can be adapted to provide systematic scholarly understanding of this phenomenon. Finally, the article explores how studying ANSAs’ foreign policies can revitalize FPA and drive its agenda into new directions.
Civil-Military Relations in the Middle East: A Literature Review
Cmi Working Paper, 2014
His research focuses on national and religious identity politics and the position of minority communities in the Middle East. Kårtveit has conducted extensive research among Christian Palestinians in the West Bank, and currently works on a project focusing on Coptic communities in Egypt. Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert is a senior researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). With a background in International Relations, her research focuses on humanitarian and security issues. Her doctoral thesis was devoted to the internationalization of the internal conflicts in Sudan, and her current research is on the Mediterranean region and EU border surveillance efforts. This CMI Working paper is a publication from the project Everyday Maneuvers: Military-Civilian Relations in Latin-America and the Middle East. The project explores the historical, cultural and political ties between military actors and civilians, and is financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.