Treatment of patients with stage I focal anaplastic and diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumour: A report from the SIOP-WT-2001 GPOH and UK-CCLG studies (original) (raw)

Treatment and outcome of Wilms' tumour patients: an analysis of all cases registered in the UKW3 trial

Annals of Oncology, 2012

Background: The randomised findings of the UKW3 trial were that preoperative chemotherapy was associated with a more advantageous stage distribution and reduction in therapy burden versus immediate nephrectomy without compromising outcome in localised Wilms' tumour (WT). We analysed outcome in all WT registered in UKW3. Patients and methods: Seven hundred and eighteen WT cases (7% anaplastic) were registered in UKW3. We assigned a treatment stage and conducted survival analysis. Results: Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.9-80.2] and 87.5% (95% CI 84.8-89.7) after median follow-up of 9.5 years and 10.0 years, respectively. Five-year OS in localised non-anaplastic cases was 92.9% (95% CI 90.2-94.9). Anaplasia was associated with adverse outcome compared with non-anaplastic cases: 5-year EFS of 42.0% (95% CI 28.3-55.1) versus 79.8% (95% CI 76.5-82.7) and 5-year OS of 60% (95% CI 45.1-72.0) versus 89.6% (95% CI 87.0-91.7), respectively. Outcomes were similar for nonanaplastic stage I or II but significantly poorer in stage III cases than stage I. Five-year OS after relapse was 54.1% (95% CI 44.5-62.8). Forty-seven percent of non-anaplastic WT received anthracycline; 27% were treated with radiotherapy first line. Conclusion: These outcomes provide a baseline for future comparisons of WT treatment approach, burden and patient outcome.

Prognostic significance of histopathological response to preoperative chemotherapy in unilateral Wilms' tumor: An analysis of 899 patients treated on the SIOP WT 2001 protocol in the UK‐CCLG and GPOH studies

International Journal of Cancer, 2021

In the SIOP Wilms' tumor (WT) studies, preoperative chemotherapy is used as primary treatment, and tumors are classified thereafter by pathologists. Completely necrotic WTs (CN-WTs) are classified as low-risk tumors. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a subset of regressive type WTs (RT-WTs) (67%-99% chemotherapy-induced changes [CIC]) showing an exceptionally good response to preoperative chemotherapy had comparably excellent survivals as CN-WTs, and to establish a cutoff point of CIC that could define this subset. The study included 2117 patients with unilateral, nonanaplastic WTs from the UK-CCLG and GPOH-WT studies (2001-2020) treated according to the SIOP-WT-2001 protocol. There were 126 patients with CN-WTs and 773 with RT-WTs, stages I-IV. RT-WTs were subdivided into subtotally necrotic WTs (>95% CIC) (STN-WT96-99) (124 patients) and the remaining of RT-WT (RR-WT67-95) (649 patients). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for CN-WTs were 95.3% (±2.1% SE) and 97.3% (±1.5% SE), and for RT-WTs 85.7% (±1.14% SE, P < .01) and 95.2% (±0.01% SE, P = .59), respectively. CN-WT and STN-WT96-99 groups showed significantly better EFS than RR-WT67-95 (P = .003 and P = .02, respectively), which remained significantly superior when adjusted for age, local stage and metastasis at diagnosis, in multivariate analysis, whereas OS were superimposable (97.

Evaluation of Late Adverse Events in Long-Term Wilms' Tumor Survivors

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related risk factors in long-term Wilms' tumor (WT) survivors, with special attention to radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The single-center study cohort consisted of 185 WT survivors treated between 1966 and 1996, who survived at least 5 years after diagnosis. All survivors were invited to a late-effects clinic for medical assessment of AEs. AEs were graded for severity in a standardized manner. Detailed radiotherapy data enabled us to calculate the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD 2) to compare radiation doses in a uniform way. Risk factors were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Medical follow-up was complete for 98% of survivors (median follow-up, 18.9 years; median attained age, 22.9 years); 123 survivors had 462 AEs, of which 392 had Grade 1 or 2 events. Radiotherapy to flank/abdomen increased the risk of any AE (OR, 1.08 Gy À1 [CI, 1.04-1.13]). Furthermore, radiotherapy to flank/abdomen was associated with orthopedic events (OR, 1.09 Gy À1 [CI, 1.05-1.13]) and second tumors (OR, 1.11 Gy À1 [CI, 1.03-1.19]). Chest irradiation increased the risk of pulmonary events (OR, 1.14 Gy À1 [CI, 1.06-1.21]). Both flank/abdominal and chest irradiation were associated with cardiovascular events (

Evaluation of boost irradiation in patients with intermediate-risk stage III Wilms tumour with positive lymph nodes only: Results from the SIOP-WT-2001 Registry

Pediatric blood & cancer, 2018

To evaluate the value of radiotherapy boost omission in patients with intermediate-risk, stage III Wilms tumours (WT) with positive lymph nodes (LN). All patients with intermediate-risk, stage III (LN positive) WT consecutively registered in the SIOP-WT-2001 study were included in this analysis. Endpoints were 5-year event-free survival (EFS), loco-regional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). Between June 2001 and May 2015, 2,569 patients with stage I to III WT after preoperative chemotherapy were registered in the SIOP-WT-2001 study. Five hundred and twenty-three (20%) had stage III disease, of which 113 patients had stage III due to positive LN only. Of those, 101 (89%) received radiotherapy, 36 of which (36%) received, apart from flank irradiation, a boost dose to the LN positive area. Four patients (4%) did not receive any adjuvant radiotherapy. In eight patients information on radiotherapy was not available. With a median follow-up of 71 months, no difference in 5-year EFS...

Secondary malignant neoplasms after Wilms tumor: An international collaborative study

International Journal of Cancer, 2010

A combined cohort of 8,884 North American, 2,893 British and 1,574 Nordic subjects with Wilms tumor (WT) diagnosed before 15 years of age during 1960–2004 was established to determine the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN). After 169,641 person-years (PY) of observation through 2005, 174 solid tumors (exclusive of basal cell carcinomas) and 28 leukemias were ascertained in 195 subjects. Median survival time after a solid SMN diagnosis 5 years or more from WT was 11 years; it was 10 months for all leukemia. Age-specific incidence of secondary solid tumors increased from approximately 1 case per 1,000 PY at age 15 to 5 cases per 1,000 PY at age 40. The cumulative incidence of solid tumors at age 40 for subjects who survived free of SMNs to age 15 was 6.7%. Leukemia risk, by contrast, was highest during the first 5 years after WT diagnosis. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for solid tumors and leukemias were 5.1 and 5.0, respectively. Results for solid tumors for the 3 geographic areas were remarkably consistent; statistical tests for differences in incidence rates and SIRs were all negative. Age-specific incidence rates and SIRs for solid tumors were lower for patients whose WT was diagnosed after 1980, although the trends with decade of diagnosis were not statistically significant. Incidence rates and SIRs for leukemia were highest among those diagnosed after 1990 (p-trend = 0.003). These trends may reflect the decreasing use of radiation therapy and increasing intensity of chemotherapy in modern protocols for treatment of WT.

Results of novel strategies for treatment of Wilms' tumor

International braz j urol, 2007

Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes in Wilms' tumor (WT). Materials and Methods: We studied 53 children with median age of 2 years with WT, stages I-19, II-14, III-12, IV-6 and V-2. Treatment consisted of surgical excision plus adjuvant (40 children) or neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (unresectable tumor, n = 8, or caval tumor extension, n = 5). Chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed protocols of Brazilian Wilms' Tumor Study Group excepting 16 cases with stage I disease that received a short duration postoperative treatment with vincristine (VCR-11 doses) and dactinomycin (AMD-4 doses). Relapsed WT was treated with multiagent regimens including cisplatin/carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide. One patient with resistant relapsed WT was treated by high-dose conditioning chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Results: Overall and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were respectively 88.2 ± 5.0% and 76.7 ± 6.6%. Short duration therapy for stage I tumor showed a disease-free survival rate of 100% in a median time of 101 months (range 14 to 248 months). Overall and disease-free survival of 10 patients with recurrent WT at 5 years was 42.8%. The child treated with high-dose chemotherapy plus stem cell transplant is alive without evidence of disease 84 months from relapse. Conclusion: The postoperative chemotherapy in stage I disease can be reduced without compromising the cure rate. The treatment of unfavorable stage III and IV disease or relapsed tumor remains a challenge.

Current status and future perspectives of wilms tumor treatment in Iran

Background: Wilms tumor (WT) is among the most common pediatric malignancies. In this study, the authors tried to evaluate the adherence to internationally-approved WT treatment protocols in our tertiary medical center in Iran. Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical records of 72 pathologically confirmed WT patients who underwent treatment from April 2014 to February 2020 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, histologic features of the tumors and metastases, utilized treatments, and survival rates were subsequently investigated. Results: From the total of 72 patients, 31 (43.1%) and 41 (56.9%) were males and females, respectively. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 44.0 (interquartile range: 18.5, 72.0) months. Among the patients, favorable histology was observed in 68 (94.6%) patients, while 4 (5.4%) patients had unfavorable histology. Regarding chemotherapy, 34/56 (60.7%), 4/56 (7.1%), and 18/56 (32.2%) received adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and combined chemotherapy, respectively. The mean numbers of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy sessions were 9.4 ± 5.6 and 14.5 ± 11.1, respectively. 32/72 (44.4%) of the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy with a mean number of 7.3 ± 3.6 sessions. Overall survival rates were 86% at 1-year, 74% at 3-year, and 62% at 5-year. Conclusion: Our results suggested that while the demographic characteristics of WT patients in Iran resemble those in other countries, abidance to internationally recommended protocols is relatively low. Moreover, survival rates were rather dismal in our study compared to those from other developing countries, further signifying the need for the development of a nation-specific treatment protocol for WT.

Survival Outcome of Wilms Tumor with Multi-Modality Treatment at Jimma Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia

Open Journal of Urology

Background: Wilms' tumor (WT), the most common malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract of children [1], accounts for 5.9% of childhood cancers and affects one in every 10,000 children worldwide before the age of 15 years. The care of children with Wilm's tumor in sub-Saharan Africa is compromised due to resource deficiencies that range from inadequate healthcare budgets to paucity of appropriately trained personnel. Childhood Wilms tumor is surging as an important paediatric problem in developing and sub-Saharan Africa countries. The objective of the study is to establish an understanding on the treatment challenges and outcomes of Wilm's tumor in South West Ethiopia. Results: Forty-three Wilm's tumor patients who were admitted from January 2017 to December 2021 were included in the study. The most frequent presentation was painless abdominal swelling in 40 (93%) patients. Fourteen patients (32.6%) were hypertensive at the time of diagnosis and the other 13 (30.2%) were normal. In abdominal examination, 31 (72.1%) patients had abdominal mass not crossing the midline and 12 (27.9%) had mass crossing the midline. After multimodal treatment, 37.5% had improvement, 11.6% came back with relapse. Most patients (41.7%) abandoned treatment and 9.3% of the cohort died in the course of treatment. Conclusion: The outcomes in the treatment of Wilms Tumor have been found to be poor in this review. The main reason for poor outcome has been not receiving adequate chemotherapy after surgery. Doses of chemotherapy received after surgery significantly affected treatment outcomes (p = 0.026).