Do Banks Value Audit Reports or Auditor Reputation? Evidence from Private Spanish Firms (original) (raw)
Related papers
The value of audit quality in public and private companies: evidence from Spain
Journal of Management & Governance, 2000
This paper compares the value of audit quality, proxied by the selection of a big N auditor, to the external claimholders of private and public companies. Although the combination of a lower ownership concentration of public companies, the greater demand for financial information quality about these companies and their higher litigation risk can result in the expectation that audit quality should be more valuable for public than for private companies, the greater information asymmetry between the managers and the external stakeholders and the unavailability of alternative mechanisms for monitoring the managers can make external audit more valuable for the external claimholders of private companies. In this paper, we test these two competing views by analysing if banks and lenders take into account auditor selection in the formation of the cost of debt. Our results support the second view: we find that only private companies obtain a lower cost of debt when they are audited by a high-quality auditor. These results are robust to both endogeneity and unobserved firm-specific heterogeneity.
African Journal of Business Management, 2018
This research studies the relation between audit firm choice and benefits that companies could gain in terms of lower cost of debt and earnings management. It focuses on private clients and the non-Big4 audit market segment, where the main driver of auditor choice has not to date been satisfactorily identified. This study identifies and tests a new criterion for auditor choice in private firms based on audit market boundaries (European vs. Domestic audit firms). Using a propensity score matched sample of private companies audited by non-Big4 audit firms in the period 2010 to 2014; this research finds that the choice of a European audit firm is negatively associated with cost of debt and earnings management. Private firms that choose audit firms operating at European level, as consequence, have lower cost of debt and earnings management, mitigate the agency conflicts between lenders and owner/manager, and improve their corporate governance mechanisms.
Auditor Choice and Corporate Bond Ratings: International Evidence
International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2013
Using a sample of 823 firms from 35 countries, we examine the impact of auditor's choice on bonds ratings. An Ordered Probit Regression Model was used to identify how the auditor choice affects the probability of bond ratings. We find strong evidence that the auditor's choice significantly affects the bond ratings. The model also shows that the quality of legal and extra-legal institutions plays an important role in improving debt ratings. More specifically, we find that the existence and the enforcement of creditor laws are associated with higher bond rating.
Auditor Choice and Corporate Bond Ratings
Using a sample of 823 firms from 35 countries, we examine the impact of auditor's choice on bonds ratings. An Ordered Probit Regression Model was used to identify how the auditor choice affects the probability of bond ratings. We find strong evidence that the auditor's choice significantly affects the bond ratings. The model also shows that the quality of legal and extra-legal institutions plays an important role in improving debt ratings. More specifically, we find that the existence and the enforcement of creditor laws are associated with higher bond rating.
Auditor reputation and earnings management: International evidence from the banking industry
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010
We examine the relation between auditor reputation and earnings management in banks using a sample of banks from 29 countries. In particular, we examine the implications of two aspects of auditor reputation, auditor type and auditor industry specialization, for earnings management in banks. We find that both auditor type and auditor industry specialization moderate benchmark-beating (loss-avoidance and just-meeting-or-beating prior year's earnings) behavior in banks. In addition, we find that once auditor type and auditor industry specialization are included in the same tests, only auditor industry specialization has a significant impact on constraining benchmark-beating behavior. In separate tests related to income-increasing abnormal loan loss provisions, we find that both auditor type and auditor expertise constrain income-increasing earnings management. Again, in joint tests, only auditor industry expertise has a significant impact on constraining income-increasing earnings management.
Do Spanish Firms Change Auditor to Avoid a Qualified Audit Report?
International Journal of Auditing, 2003
In this paper we investigate whether Spanish firms employ deliberate strategies in the choice of auditor to avoid audit qualification. For a sample of 735 during the period 1991-96 we found no increase in the probability of changing auditor following an audit qualification. We concluded that this would be too obvious and detrimental to the firm's interests. However, 135 firms do change auditor during the period examined. We found that firms that have been qualified are significantly less likely to move to higher quality auditors than are unqualified firms, when that quality is measured by the specialisation of the auditor, auditor brand name, auditor size and auditor conservatism. For the 92 qualified firms changing auditor the likelihood of a subsequent qualification is significantly related to the quality of the auditor selected.
External audit quality and firms’ credit score
Cogent Business & Management
Using a sample of UK firms, we investigate whether external audit quality has an informational role for firms credit score. In our general research setting, we could not find any evidence on the association between firms' credit score and external audit quality. However, when firms are suspected to be engaged in managerial misstatements, firms' credit score seems to be associated with external audit quality. In particular, suspected firms get high credit score when they are audited by one of industry-specialised auditors. In addition, credit rating agencies penalise suspect firms when they pay high audit and non-audit fees.
Do audited firms have a lower cost of debt?
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2022
The purpose of this study is to investigate if audited financial statements add value for firms in the private debt market. Using an instrumental variable method, we find that firms with audited financial statements, on average, save 0.47 percentage points on the cost of debt compared to firms with unaudited financial statements. We also find that using the big, well-known auditing firms does not yield any additional cost of debt benefits. Lastly, we investigate if there are industries where alternative sources of information make auditing less valuable in reducing the cost of debt. Here, we find that auditing is less important in lowering cost in one industry, agriculture, where one lender has a 74% market share and a 100-year history of lending to firms within that industry. As such, it seems that lenders having high exposure to a certain industry might act as an alternative to auditing in reducing the information asymmetry between the firm and the lender.
The Impact of Corporate Governance on Auditor Choice
Social Science Research Network, 2011
In this research, the effect of corporate governance on choosing audit firms by companies accepted into the Tehran Stock Exchange has been investigated. The sample consisted of 545 observations (year-company) from 2004 to 2008. The audit firm size has been considered an audit quality criterion. The results of testing the research hypotheses by using a logistic regression model by means of the backward elimination method at the levels of all companies show that increasing the percentage of outside directors will increase the possibility of choosing high-quality audit firms. The percentage of institutional ownership (first hypothesis) has a negative meaningful relationship with the possibility of choosing high-quality audit firms as opposed to what was expected. Therefor only the fifth hypothesis of this research has been accepted regarding all companies. After the industry types were separately observed, the industry type was revealed that as a modifying factor it has an important effect on improving the statistics of the model and that it increases the potential of the power of prediction of the presented models.
Auditors’ Liability to Lenders and Auditor Conservatism
Management Science
We examine the near-privity rule that increases the auditor’s legal liability exposure by considering a debtholder who can sue the auditor and recover damages when there is an audit failure. We show that the increase in the auditor’s legal liability induces the auditor to choose more informative and more conservative efforts. Although the increased informative effort has a favorable spillover effect that increases the equityholder’s expected payoff, the increased conservative effort induces a bias—that is, decreases the likelihood of reporting a true good state as good—and thus induces an adverse spillover effect that decreases the equityholder’s expected payoff. As such, when the conservative effort bias is small, the favorable spillover effect dominates the adverse spillover effect, and the equityholder prefers the near-privity regime. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.