Farmers’ experiences of the farm assessment: interviews with farmers (original) (raw)
Related papers
Defining the Concept of “Genuine Farmer” under the Common Agricultural Policy after 2020
ACS - Agriculturae conspectus scientificus, 2021
The European Commission Draft Regulation on Common Agricultural Policy 2021-2027, proposes that the concept of "genuine farmers" shall be defined so as to ensure that no support is granted to those whose agricultural activity forms only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or whose principal business activity is not agricultural, while not precluding from support pluri-active farmers. The Commission proposal has sparked debate among Member States, since defining the concept of "genuine farmer" is the basis for receiving support. The aim of the research was to determine the opinion of agricultural representatives regarding the definition of "genuine farmer". Consequently, agricultural representatives of various agricultural associations from the Republic of Croatia were interviewed in two phases. In the first phase, agricultural representatives were examined within a focus group under the project "CAP for You" funded by the European Commission. In the second phase, agricultural representatives from the Croatian Chamber of Agriculture were asked to write their own definition of "genuine farmer". The results showed that the majority of these representatives considered "genuine farmer" one whose primary business activity is agriculture.
The process of …, 2011
Summary This report covers the project outcome Deliverable 4.2 'Analysis completed after a joint effort to identify possibilities in each country as how to facilitate the best possible dialogue regarding animal health and welfare' as part of the European CORE Organic project ' ...
Land Use Policy, 2017
Farmers are those who daily supervise and manage rural areas, but still their collaborations with those institutions entitled to decide the transformation of these territories are not managed properly. The experiences of participatory processes with the involvement of farmers are analyzed in many agricultural studies. A systematic review has allowed us to analyse experiences related to 35 participation paths aimed at rural regions' development. The analysis has been made on the basis of 14 variables describing the path followed and its purpose, the agricultural holding involved and the areas surveyed. The work has the objectives to identify some strengths and weaknesses in the involvement of farmers in decision-making and the strengths and weaknesses of the processes themselves. The review has shown that too often in participatory processes farmers are considered only as a source of information to be used by researchers rather than as active participants in the choices for the protection, management and transformation of the rural territory. An effective participatory rural appraisal requires greater empowerment of farmers. In general, compared to the methods and tools used, farmers are wary of paths that are too complex and prefer the use of low-tech tools. This result can be attributed to the farmers' demand of direct contact with the researchers to build trust and also to the average age of European farmers, which is pretty high. In participation contexts, it is not possible to establish standardized methods and tools, because each process should be tailored for the community that expresses it. Nevertheless, the work has highlighted the need to establish some minimum principles to avoid considering unsuccessful some participation paths which, in reality, have been only scarcely participated. In the work, these principles have been presented through the development of key questions, to which those who design the path for an effective engagement of agricultural stakeholder must respond: representativeness, empowerment, empirical knowledge, relationships, group type, numerosity and involvement stage.