Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Size and Function in Chronic Heart Failure (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of General Practice, 2018
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular reverse remodeling and functional recovery in patients with advanced heart failure and to establish predictors for positive response to cardiac resynchronization. Methods: The study population consisted of 48 patients (age 68 ± 8.51 years, 79.55% male). Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography, electrocardiogram, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and NYHA functional class evaluation before biventricular pacemaker implantation and during follow-up. Results: Median follow-up was 21.89 ± 9.21 months. 4 (7.7%) patients died from heart failure. Reverse left ventricular remodeling was observed in 77.08% (N=37) patients. CRT resulted in statistically significant improvement of NYHA functional class (p=0.015) and the increased results of 6MWT (p=0.000). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated lower pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR 1.152, 95% CI 1.026-1.293; p=0.017) and more severe mitral regurgitation (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.018-0.769; p=0.025) prior to device implantation as significant predictors of positive response to CRT. Poor response cutoff value of PASP ≥ 46 mmHg was established in ROC analyses, with 78% of sensitivity and 62% of specificity. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the reversible cardiac remodeling and improvement in systolic left and right ventricular function and functional condition in advanced heart failure patients treated with CRT. According to our study, lower pulmonary artery pressure and more severe mitral regurgitation prior to device implantation predicted favorable long-term response to CRT.
Italian heart journal: official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology
Background. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Unfortunately up to 30% of patients could be non-responders. The aim of our study was to find parameters to predict responsiveness to CRT. Methods. Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 67.3 ± 7.8 years, range 52-83 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA functional class III-IV, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35% and QRS ≥ 110 ms, underwent CRT. All the patients had echocardiographic evidence of systolic dyssynchrony. Results. One patient died of electromechanical dissociation. The remaining 14 patients maintained biventricular stimulation at 6 months; mean QRS width decreased from 156 to 132 ms (p < 0.001). Ten patients (71%) were considered responders because of a reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 15%. In non-responders (4 patients, 29%) LV end-systolic volume was stable in 3 patients and increased in 1. LV ejection fraction significantly increased only in responders (p < 0.001). Responders had more severe pre-pacing dyssynchrony than non-responders (p < 0.001). Inter-(p = 0.002) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (p = 0.003) did significantly reduce after CRT only in responders. On multiple regression analysis there were two independent predictors of reverse remodeling after pacing: the baseline mitral QS-tricuspid QS (QSm-QSt) time (ß =-1.7, p = 0.005) and the intraventricular dyssynchrony index (ß =-1.55, p = 0.007). Pre-implant QSm-QSt of 38 ms correctly identified the two groups: responders had a value > 38 ms and non-responders < 38 ms. The pre-implant intraventricular dyssynchrony index of 28 ms was the cutoff value: responders had an index > 28 ms, non-responders < 28 ms. Conclusions. In the literature a tissue Doppler imaging index of intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated before implantation is used to select responders to CRT. In our work we studied interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, and both the QSm-QSt time and the standard deviation of the 12 LV segment QS time were correctly able to identify responders.
Texas Heart Institute Journal, 2022
BackgroundSince the introduction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to improve left ventricular function, the effect of CRT on the right ventricle in patients with heart failure has not been well described.MethodsWe evaluated the effect of CRT on right ventricular systolic function in 20 patients (80% men; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [9.8] y) with cardiomyopathy and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (New York Heart Association class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS interval ≥120 ms). The median follow-up time was 15 months. Right ventricular systolic function, defined as a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) index of 16 mm or less, was evaluated in patients before and after CRT.ResultsTwelve (60%) patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 12 (60%) patients had left bundle branch block detected using surface electrocardiogram. The mean (SD) QRS duration was 160.5 (24.4) ms. From before CRT to the time of follow-up after CRT, the mean (SD) ejection fraction increased significantly from 22.5% (5.6%) to 29.4% (7.4%) (P < .001). The mean (SD) TAPSE index also increased significantly from 13.70 (1.78) mm to 16.50 (4.77) mm (P = .018). Eleven (55%) patients showed improved right ventricular systolic function (TAPSE ≥16 mm) after CRT. Patients with a favorable right ventricular response to CRT were significantly older (64.6 [8.2] y vs 53.6 [8.4] y, respectively) and more likely to have nonischemic origin of cardiomyopathy than were patients with unimproved right ventricular function (66.7% vs 18.2%, respectively).ConclusionOur findings indicate that CRT is associated with improved right ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure and right ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients with nonischemic heart disease more often show improved right ventricular function after CRT.
Heart Failure Etiology in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Is It Relevant?
Modern Medicine, 2021
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HfrEF). Etiology may influence the outcome of patients undergoing CRT. Objective: to evaluate whether etiology (ischemic vs non-ischemic) influences the response to CRT and overall outcome. Methods: Our study included HFrEF patients undergoing CRT between January 2017-November 2019. We assessed right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) function using transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and one year after CRT. The response to CRT was defined by a decrease of more than 15% of left ventricle systolic volume. Patients were divided in two groups: ischemic and non-ischemic based on personal history. Adverse events (HF related hospitalizations and deaths) were tracked for 33± 12.8 months. Results: 52 patients undergoing CRT were included (64±13.5 years, 55.7% male, 70% non-ischemic etiology) The two groups were similar considering LV systolic baseline parameters and volumes. Ischemic etiology was associated with non-LBBB morphology on ECG (p=0.03), a more severe LV diastolic dysfunction using E/e ratio (p<0.05), and a more severe RV dysfunction using TAPSE (p=0.008) and RV fractional area change (FAC) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in CRT response between ischemic and non-ischemic etiology. 14 (26.9%) patients had events (10 hospitalizations and 4 deaths) with a higher prevalence in the ischemic group (58.33% vs 25%, p=0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis reported a higher risk of cardiovascular events for ischemic etiology (HR 2.4, 95% CI [0.8-8.1], p <0.05). In our cohort there was no significant difference in use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in addition to CRT between ischemic and non-ischemic group (64.2% respectively 63.3%, p =0.3). Conclusion: Our study shows that ischemic and nonischemic HF patients had similar response to CRT. However, ischemic etiology was associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events and a worse RV systolic dysfunction at baseline.
Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology, 2005
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Unfortunately up to 30% of patients could be non-responders. The aim of our study was to find parameters to predict responsiveness to CRT. Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 67.3 +/- 7.8 years, range 52-83 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA functional class III-IV, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35% and QRS > or = 110 ms, underwent CRT. All the patients had echocardiographic evidence of systolic dys-synchrony. One patient died of electromechanical dissociation. The remaining 14 patients maintained biventricular stimulation at 6 months; mean QRS width decreased from 156 to 132 ms (p < 0.001). Ten patients (71%) were considered responders because of a reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 15%. In non-responders (4 patients, 29%) LV end-systolic volume was stable in 3 patients and increased in 1. LV ejection fraction significantly increased on...
Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology, 2021
Improvement in systolic functions after CRThas been well-established, but the effect on Left Ventricular (LV) diastolic functions is variable and not well established. The aim of this study is to analyze the improvement in diastolic functions of the heart after CRT. Total 67 cases of Heart Failure (HF) eligible for CRT (mean age, 62.5 ± 11.73 years; 54 males and 13 females) with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤35% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III / Ambulatory IV (IVA) were included in the study. LVEF, pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) derived transmitral filling indices (E and A wave velocities, E/A ratio), and peak early diastolic longitudinal myocardial velocity (E´) wave by tissue doppler were measured pre and post CRT and were compared. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) increased >5% (responders) in 42 of 67 patients (62.6%) which was also associated with a reduction in pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) derived indices that is E velocity, E/A ratio and E/...