Priming the Preceptor Pipeline: Collaboration, Resources, and Recognition (original) (raw)
Related papers
American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2017
The 2016-2017 AACP Professional Affairs Committee (PAC) was charged to examine strategies to include adjunct/affiliate preceptors as AACP members and to determine the value proposition of AACP membership for this group of educators. The PAC defined adjunct/affiliate preceptors as preceptors who are neither full-time employees nor have a primary employment commitment (≥50% of the preceptor's work salary) at a school/college of pharmacy. Specific charges to the PAC included: recommend an approach to increase the number of adjunct/affiliate preceptors as AACP members, examine AACP membership from an adjunct/affiliate preceptor value perspective, and prepare a concise summary of available literature describing value-added contributions of student pharmacists and pharmacy preceptors to pharmacy practice models, interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional practice (IPP). The summary of the plan developed by the PAC to address the charges is presented in the following repor...
A Precepting-Focused Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Academia
INNOVATIONS in pharmacy, 2020
Description of the Opportunity: Traditional advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) in academia provide students exposure to job responsibilities and expectations of pharmacy faculty members. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the development and structure of a precepting-focused academic APPE, APPE student perceptions of the experience, and introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) student perceptions of being precepted by APPE students. Innovation: An academic pharmacy APPE was developed to emphasize preceptor development in addition to traditional academic pharmacy topics and responsibilities. Pre- and post-experience surveys were completed by APPE students to collect perceptions of academic pharmacy and precepting. During the experience, APPE students, under the supervision of faculty, precepted IPPE students, who were given the opportunity to assess the APPE student’s precepting ability by completing a survey following the experience. Descriptive statis...
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2012
According to the Bylaws of AACP, the Professional Affairs Committee is to study: issues associated with the professional practice as they relate to pharmaceutical education, and to establish and improve working relationships with all other organizations in the field of health affairs. The Committee is also encouraged to address related agenda items relevant to its Bylaws charge and to identify issues for consideration by subsequent committees, task forces, commission, or other groups.
Pharmacy practice faculty and preceptor development
JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020
Faculty development is a priority for colleges and schools of pharmacy for both corporate and individual success. Recommendations in the 2008 American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) position statement and white paper on faculty development remain relevant today. However, changes in educational standards, delivery of pharmacy education, and faculty and learners have prompted an update of the 2008 documents. This 2020 white paper focuses on three components: preceptor development, updates in pharmacy practice faculty development, and program formation and implementation. The paper provides evidence and recommendations for preceptor development and summarizes the literature updates related to pharmacy practice faculty development in several areas, including teaching, practice, and research. This update explores additional topics not emphasized in the previous paper, including faculty well‐being, holistic career‐long development, and challenges with implementing and assessing devel...
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2013
BACKGROUND AND CHARGES According to the Bylaws of AACP, the Professional Affairs Committee is to study issues associated with the professional practice as they relate to pharmaceutical education, and to establish and improve working relationships with all other organizations in the field of health affairs. The Committee is also encouraged to address related agenda items relevant to its Bylaws charge and to identify issues for consideration by subsequent committees, task forces, commissions, or other groups. President J. Lyle Bootman charged the 2012-2013 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Standing Committees with issues related to transforming healthcare. 1 President Bootman encourages AACP institutional and individual members to "get to all the right tables of influence at the right time" and recognizes the local/state partnerships that member schools/ colleges have with other stakeholders in health care can and does result in improving health care. Specifically, the 2012-2013 Professional Affairs Committee is charged to: (1) Identify successful practices in the development and maintenance of effective relationships between state pharmacy organizations and schools/ colleges of pharmacy and (2) Recommend strategies related to state and local policy developments to optimally position pharmacists in health reform initiatives. Members of the Professional Affairs Committee (PAC) include faculty from multiple disciplines from various schools/colleges of pharmacy as well as two executive directors of state pharmacy associations from the National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations (NASPA). Prior to an in-person meeting of the committee, pertinent background information and resource materials were distributed and a conference call was held to develop a strategy, for addressing committee charges. The majority of committee members met for a day and a half in Crystal City, Virginia on October 29-30, 2012 to discuss the various facets related to this issue as well as to develop a process and strategies for addressing the charges. The committee members not able to meet in person were teleconferenced in during the Virginia meeting to provide their input. Following the process development and delegation of assignments related to the committee charges, the PAC communicated via electronic communications as well as through personal exchanges via telephone and email. The result is the following report, which discusses the elements and importance of a recognized relationship between pharmacy organizations, specifically professional organizations at the state level and boards of pharmacy as well as successful practices and strategies to guide the academy to be present and active at the "tables of influence" that will enhance the profession and improve patient care.
Developing and Implementing an Academy of Preceptors
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2009
developed, and implemented the Academy of Preceptors to foster preceptor development. The Academy's goals are to recognize preceptor excellence, improve experiential course delivery, develop preceptors' educational skills, and facilitate networking among preceptors. In 2004, the Academy's initial focus was development of live continuing education programs for preceptor development. A CD-ROM format also was developed for those who could not attend live sessions. Preceptors were asked to suggest additional topics of interest for future programs. In this paper, we describe our progress toward the goals, the School's benefits from the Academy, and the implications for the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP). Preceptors provide 30% of pharmacy curricula; thus, the need for their training and ongoing professional development has been increasingly emphasized within experiential education. Priorities are to train preceptors to become better educators and motivate these practitioners to improve pharmacy education by sharing their valuable expertise with students.
American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe 2020-21 Professional Affairs Committee was charged to (1) Read all six reports from the 2019-20 AACP standing committees to identify elements of these reports that are relevant to the committee's work this year; (2) Identify opportunities and models of integration of pharmacist care services in physician and other health provider practices beyond primary care; (3) Differentiate and make the case for the integration of pharmacist care services from that of other mid-level providers; and (4) From the work on the aforementioned charges, identify salient activities for the Center To Accelerate Pharmacy Practice Transformation and Academic Innovation (CTAP) for consideration by the AACP Strategic Planning Committee and AACP staff. This report provides information on the committee's process to address the committee charges, describes the rationale for and the results from a call to colleges and schools of pharmacy to provide information on the...