Mackenzie, N. M., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2). (original) (raw)
Related papers
Research Dilemmas: Paradigms, Methods and Methodology
In this article the authors discuss issues faced by early career researchers, including the dichotomy, which many research textbooks and journal articles create and perpetuate between qualitative and quantitative research methodology despite considerable literature to support the use of mixed methods. The authors review current research literature and discuss some of the language, which can prove confusing to the early career researcher and problematic for postgraduate supervisors and teachers of research. The authors argue that discussions of research methods in research texts and university courses should include mixed methods and should address the perceived dichotomy between qualitative and quantitative research methodology.
When does a researcher choose a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approach
In educational studies, the paradigm war over quantitative and qualitative research approaches has raged for more than half a century. The focus in the late twentieth century was on the distinction between the two approaches, and the motivation was to retain one of the approaches' supremacy. Since the early twenty-first century, there has been a growing interest in situating in the middle position and combining both approaches into a single study or a series of studies. Despite these signs of progress, when it comes to using the appropriate research approach at the right time, beginner educational researchers remain perplexed. This paper, therefore, provides useful guidelines that facilitate the choice of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approaches in educational inquiry. To achieve this objective, this article comprises three distinct and underlying areas of interest, which have been structured into three sections. The first section highlights the distinctions between quantitative and qualitative research approaches. The second section discusses the paradigm views that underpin the choice of a particular research approach. Finally, an effort has been made to determine the appropriate time to opt for any of the research approaches that facilitate successful educational investigations. Since truth and the means used to discover it are both dynamic, it is also essential to foresight innovative approaches to research with distinguishing features of applications to educational research.
Mixed Methods Research: A New Paradigm in Educational Research
2013
Mixed methods are the third paradigm of educational research. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches are considered in mixed methods research. The quantitative paradigm is influenced by positivism and qualitative paradigm is under the influence of hermeneutics, critical theory, and post-structuralism, but philosophical foundation for mixed methods research is pragmatism. Therefore, educational researchers can benefit from positive features of qualitative and quantitative research. In mixed methods, researchers collect, analyze and integrate qualitative and quantitative data. Since quantitative research takes statistical methods, experimental and quasi-experimental design, therefore its findings have the power of prediction and generalization. In contrast, qualitative research findings can understand the underlying layers of social phenomenon. Therefore, the supporters of mixed methods research are trying to design research that will have both precision and depth. In data colle...
The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators
South African Journal of Education, 2008
The landscape of research is continually evolving, enabling researchers to study increasingly complex phenomena. Educational researchers have propelled much of this forward progress and have developed novel methodologies to provide increasingly sound and complete evidence. Mixed methods research has emerged alongside quantitative and qualitative approaches as an important tool for researchers. In this article our overall aim is to better acquaint educational scholars with the mixed methods field by articulating the development of the mixed methods field and by citing current trends and issues. The role of educational researchers in the evolution of mixed methods research is highlighted. The early and ongoing dialogue of mixed methods research is multidisciplinary in nature with current writings across fields. The current debate over key aspects of mixed methods research is now in progress and is ripe for future contributions. Even the very nature of what constitutes mixed methods research is being discussed among scholars. Understanding and advancing the mixed methods field is an important goal for methodologists and researchers. W ith the increased interest and enthusiasm for mixed methods research, it is likely that the dialogue surrounding mixed methods approaches will thrive, continuing the movement of the field.
The aim of this review is to create awareness about uses of available social research methods and to provide a guideline in adopting appropriate methods specifically in qualitative and mixed methods research genre. Based on the review of contemporary social research methods I believe that mixed methods research produces more accurate results than relying on either qualitative or quantitative methods alone in explaining complex social issues. This paper contributes to the methodological literature in two areas. First, create awareness among social researchers and students about the available research methods in order to help them to adopt suitable research designs in addressing their particular research questions. Second, encourage scholars from all disciplines to theorize further, especially in the field of mixed methods, and engage in a dialogue in order to improve methodological appropriateness for future research in social sciences.
International Journal of Research, 2021
Quantitative and qualitative methods are the engine behind evidence-based outcomes. For decades, one of the popular phenomena that troubled young researchers is that which appropriate research methodto employ in their research. Both qualitative and quantitative methods have been further considered in the research methodology, especially in the field of education. In most pieces of research, these approaches are considered to be two functional and necessary methods. The main aim of this paper is to identify the differences between quantitative and qualitative research methods and to evaluate the bright discrepancies between these two factors. Besides, this paper is expected to help young researchers to realize the precise approach and apply it properly in their research.The researchers recommend young researchers use both qualitative and quantitative simultaneously to promote the quality of their research.
Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigm Constellation In Educational Research Methodology
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
Differences qualitative and quantitative research to academicians and researchers mainly concentrated on education studies is only able to browse and identify with the fundamental difference merely as example: research that only uses quantitative data but using the qualitative as a benchmark often not considered as a quantitative research Likewise , qualitative research that uses quantitative data is not considered qualitative research. If traced further, actually qualitative and quantitative research very spacious and is a level. Qualitative and quantitative research in the context of methodology includes a researcher's conception of social reality, the researcher's self placement in relation to the reality study and various other reviews. Therefore, in this research article,is stated that the correlation between qualitative and quantitative research in educational research methodology is possible if both are based on the same paradigm. Conversely qualitative and quantit...