Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 2009
The local-government proliferation practice, as an implementation of Indonesia's decentralization reform, has resulted in a fragmentation of regional development, in which many local government consider themselves of their own 'kingdom of authority'. This attitude could in turn inhibit local and regional development. The phenomenon of Indonesia's localgovernment proliferation is unique, as not many countries in the world have experienced as rapid growth in regional proliferation as Indonesia.
Do the donors have it right? Decentralization and changing local governance in Indonesia
The Annals of Regional Science, 2003
Indonesia has initiated an ambitious decentralization program since 1999 spurred on by the international donor community (earlier decentralization measures were more like ''deconcentration'' under strong central control). This paper examines the degree to which Laws 22/1999 and 25/1999 are working. Local government employment has been expanded (not fully offset by a decline in central government employment) and training has been provided. Many functions have been transferred to the local level, but this was not matched by adequate funding transfers. Those localities that fare best have revenues available from their own natural resources. The results, therefore, are very mixed, and it is much too early to determine whether decentralization is a success.
2018
The decentralization system is mandated by the Indonesian Government to enable regional development in the reformation era, specifically after 2004–2005. There were at least two crucial momentums that enforced the decentralization effort by the government; the Regional Government Law (UU Pemerintahan Daerah) which was then revised in 2014, and President Joko Widodo’s (2015–2019) policy of ‘marginal’ development, or development focussing on rural regions and citizens in the lower economic classes. In the last decade, the development process in Indonesia has greatly accelerated, especially in the infrastructure of Indonesia’s many regions. Unfortunately, there is still a significant disparity between the western and the eastern part of Indonesia, and between the urban and the rural areas. Indonesia’s inequality problem is evident in its Gini ratio, which scores at around 0.4, even though in the last five years that number has shown some decrease. Using Bromley’s policy-institution ana...
Indonesia's Decentralization Policy: Initial Experiences and Emerging Problems
After over 30 years under a highly centralized national government, Indonesia decided to implement a policy of decentralization that became effective on January 1st, 2001. This paper examines the preparations that have been undertaken within the regions, some of the initial implementation measures, and some of the key problems that emerged during the process of decentralization as managed by regional governments. The paper is based on research conducted in thirteen districts across ten provinces over the past eighteen months. This presentation has two areas of focus: first, the internal processes undertaken by local governments to manage their new powers and responsibilities; second, whether the process of creating public policies under regional autonomy for the regions reflects the spirit of transparency, good governance and democracy. Law No. 22, 1999 on “Local Government” has devolved central government powers and responsibilities to local governments in all government administra...
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2016
Since 2001, Indonesia has undergone a rapid and extensive programme of decentralization of governance and resources from the centre to local level. This devolution has created a new class of regional political elites and has shifted significant power back to sub-national levels in Indonesia's centuries' long history of centre-local tensions. While the political motivations of mitigating centrifugal pressures appear to be vindicated, the anticipated gains in service provision and downstream economic impacts have not uniformly materialized: efficiency gains in some regions have been offset by the widespread emergence of clientalistic practices and fiscal inefficiencies. Recent efforts towards limited administrative and political recentralization underscore the tension that remains between the centre and local governments.
Decentralization and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia
2009
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 2024
The implementation of decentralization policies in Indonesia highlights contested interests between central and subnational governments. Particularly since the end of authoritarian rule, decentralization efforts have continuously faced tensions with recentralization interests. These interests do not necessarily aim to restore a strong state with a hierarchical command structure. Instead, the recent decentralization policies tend to display an administrative state supported by hierarchical policies. Consequently, the autonomous regions are no longer fully autonomous in managing their internal affairs but are increasingly required to comply with national policies. This study seeks to further investigate the reasons behind these shifts through a critical discourse analysis of relevant documents, FGDs, and expert interviews. Primary data were collected from in-depth interviews and FGD recordings, while secondary data were obtained from relevant literature. These data were then analyzed by synthesizing key findings per each expert and applying a link-and-match approach. This study seeks to validate the collected information to facilitate the interpretation of new findings, which were then presented in a draft outlining the debates on the topic and the position of the study. The findings indicate that the paradigm shift has made decentralization more administratively burdensome for the subnational level, as demonstrated by the increased policy assistance from the central government. The central government manages decentralization at the provincial, district, municipal, and even village levels through targeted policy objectives with key indicators. Consequently, the current decentralization creates a dependent relationship between subnational governments and the central government, primarily through fiscal transfers. A limitation of this study includes the relatively unexplored responses from local officials.
Decentralization: Proliferation of Territories in Musi Rawas Regency, Indonesia
2018
Formation of new autonomous regions are meant to promote effective governance, by reducing the span of control of the previous more extensive area, improving the quality of public services, increasing the wealth of the local people, setting the fiscal balance between central and local government, increasing employment and capital inflow. However, the formation process of North MusiRawas as a new autonomous region took 11 years since proposed in 2002 until signed by the central government in 2013. This paper argues that the factors behind the long delay were mainly political factors, instead of administrative. Administrate, the region is eligible to be established as a new autonomous region. This study uses the NVivo Program as a tool for conducting primary and secondary data analyzed from direct interviews, meeting results and statements from related parties. From the research results obtained that the political process, however, involves a series of events in its history that gener...