Thermodynamics: A Structure for Teaching and Learning About Much of Reality (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mach's thesis: Thermodynamics as the basic theory for physics teaching
Science & Education, 1994
Recently, some teachers have launched proposals for teaching physics by starting from thermodynamics rather than from mechanics. Such proposals are included in Mach's thesis, according to which thermodynamics is more basic for theoretical physics than mechanics. The past history of such a thesis is quickly sketched. Then, by recent results in theoretical physics, it is qualified in a new, modern version. As such it appears as an instance of a general conflict between two radically different ways to produce theoretical physics. The conflict results from two different options, about both the kind of mathematics and the kind of the organization of the theory. After such a general illustration of the great relevance of history of physics for physics teaching, the cultural bounds of such proposals are recognized and discussed.
Energies MDPI, 2020
Thermodynamics is a discipline, with unambiguous concepts, words, laws and usefulness. Today it is in danger of becoming a Tower of Babel. Its key words are being pasted brazenly on new concepts, to promote them with no respect for their proper meaning. In this brief Perspective, I outline a few steps to correct our difficult situation.
Why so many “schools” of thermodynamics?
Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, 2007
A classification representing some main branches of phenomenological nonequilibrium thermodynamics is discussed. Differences and similarities of these selected branches are explained. Starting out with basic concepts of phenomenological thermodynamics, more developed theories with different back-grounds contributing to contemporary thermodynamics are considered. Because of its vast extent, this field cannot be presented completely in a single reasonably sized paper without any omissions.
Scientific mental representations of Thermodynamics
Science & Education, 1996
The analysis of a certain number of textbooks on Thermodynamics is expounded with the aim of showing that several “mental representations” of this subject matter are present in scientific literature. This analysis points out divergent attitudes not only towards the definition of fundamental concepts principles, but also towards the epistemological status of Thermodynamics. These attitudes underlie-sometimes tacitly-the relationship between the macroscopic and the microscopic approach on one side and between the “state” or “process” approach on the other. We also show the importance of both the historical reconstruction and the epistemological analysis for a deeper understanding of what these different mental representations underlie and entail.
Re-introducing science, 2019
This study refers to the distinction between the macroscopic and microscopic frameworks of thermodynamics and its impact on the teaching and learning of essential principles of the field, such as the conservation of energy through the first law of thermodynamics. We engage in an epistemological analysis and a cognitive approach in order to investigate the limits of the two frameworks and the outcomes of their conflation. From the viewpoint of epistemology, we present a historiographical analysis and also a textbook analysis reflecting the formation of the separate branches of classical and statistical thermodynamics. Through the approach of the cognitive aspect, we report the results from the recent body of research that implies that the blending of the two frameworks impedes the students' accurate interpretations of thermodynamic processes. On this account, we suggest that the macroscopic framework is sufficient for the teaching and learning of introductory level thermodynamics and we briefly present the design principles and results of a teaching and learning sequence for the first law of thermodynamics in upper secondary school students.
UniServe Science Proceedings, 2009
A large proportion of research in science education is either centred on or influenced by studies concerning conceptual change -in particular, the topic of students' misconceptions. This is justified by the observation that studies involving conceptual change or troublesome knowledge capture an aspect of science education that seems to be extremely significant for successful learning and vital for developments in instructional methods.
A Comparative Study of Two Different Approaches in Teaching Thermodynamics
A preliminary study has been carried out to compare the outcome of two different approaches in teaching thermodynamics. The results from the first year undergraduate students taking the subject for the first time in two classes conducted by different lecturers using different approaches indicate that the impact on the top half of the class is not significant whereas to the other half the approaches may have some bearing on the performance of the students.
The influence of teaching methodologies in the learning of thermodynamics in secondary education
This research has as it is the objective to show the influence of three different teaching methodologies in the learning of some basic concepts of thermodynamic with 14 and 15-year old students. This study was motivated by the scholar failure of students at these ages, especially in science. The sample was 93 students divided in three homogenous groups. Each group learnt the concepts with a teaching methodology. The concepts were density, pressure, volume, temperature and heat, these are the concepts of the curriculum. The instruments were a pretest and a posttest with theoretical questions, exercises and problems about thermodynamics concepts, moreover students made an intelligence test to verify the homogeneity of the groups. The results brought us that the teaching methodology has a very important role in the learning of the students in secondary education.