Triangulation of Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualizations Related to the Rule of Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
Measuring and Conceptualizing Rule of Law
This paper examines different measurements of the concept “rule of law”. Analysis shows that most of the organizations that measures the rule of law differ in terms of their approach and conceptualization of the concept. As a result, different measurements measure different dimensions of the concept. In addition, some organizations take too broad definition of the concept which leads concept becoming too stretched, while some take too specific definition which then makes their concept of “the rule of law” to be synonymous with other concepts such as democracy. Moreover, the organizations that undertake measurement of the rule of law worldwide fail to consider the problem of contextual specificity and do not take considerable actions to establish equivalence among different regions which then restricts measurement validity.
Legal Consciousness: A Systematic Review of its Conceptualization and Measurement Methods1
Anuario de Psicología Jurídica
The aim of this article is to conduct a systematic review of articles on both the conceptualization and the measurement possibilities of legal consciousness (hereinafter LC). There are two main goals of this review: the unification of the so far highly diverse terminology and the exploration of recent measurement methods in the field. We argue that further development of LC research field is of crucial importance in current legal science, because LC itself can be understood and explored as one of the core elements of the legitimacy of any legal system (Jennes & Calavita, 2018; Young, 2014). Generally, two different ways of accessing legitimacy of law can be distinguished. First, legitimate law should be "justifiable" (i.e., considered as potentially just and acceptable by legal philosophers and other professionals). Second, legitimate law ought to be also "justified" (i.e., considered as actually just and acceptable by citizens Anuario de Psicología Jurídica (2021) 31 9-34 h t t p s : / / j o u r n a l s. c o p m a d r i d. o rg / a p j
THE RULE, THE LAW, AND THE RULE OF LAW: IMPROVING MEASUREMENTS AND CONTENT VALIDITY
This article examines the role of states in establishing the rule of law. It identifies several flaws in the current indexes and calls for better measurements of the rule of law by making two substantive claims: a) there is a need to account for law enforcement and citizen’s compliance as key components of the rule of law and b) measurements of the rule of law should be based on hard or behavioral data. This article proposes a road map to conceptualize the problem and presents promising initial data and an index that captures the “rule” dimension of the rule of law for Latin American countries. This represents a base for further examination and debate.
2009
This paper describes the methodology used to build the WJP Rule of Law Index-a new quantitative assessment tool designed to offer a comprehensive picture of the extent to which countries adhere to the rule of law in practice. The WJP Rule of Law Index provides new data on nine dimensions of the rule of law −limited government powers; absence of corruption; order and security; fundamental rights; open government; regulatory enforcement; access to civil justice; effective criminal justice; and informal justice− and is compiled from original surveys of the general public and local legal experts. The paper also presents estimates for an initial group of 66 countries. ABSTRACT This paper describes the methodology used to build the WJP Rule of Law Index-a new quantitative assessment tool designed to offer a comprehensive picture of the extent to which countries adhere to the rule of law in practice. The WJP Rule of Law Index provides new data on nine dimensions of the rule of law −limited government powers; absence of corruption; order and security; fundamental rights; open government; regulatory enforcement; access to civil justice; effective criminal justice; and informal justice− and is compiled from original surveys of the general public and local legal experts. The paper also presents estimates for an initial group of 66 countries.
Anuario de Psicología Juridica, 2021
This article reports on a conducted systematic review focused on conceptualization and measurement methods of legal consciousness, which can be understood as the equivalent for the legitimacy of law. A systematic search identified 2,054 articles, resulting in the inclusion of 156 relevant articles after two phases of the screening process. Articles analyzed lacked a clear conceptualization of a legal consciousness construct and validated methods of its measurement with satisfactory quality. A considerable room for improvement was found for both conceptualization and measurement methods of legal consciousness. This review identifies six separate components of legal consciousness (general knowledge, skills, specific knowledge, attitudes, trust, and identity) and offers a unifying and comprehensive definition of legal consciousness based on those components. Using descriptive characteristics and inference statistics, main methodological weaknesses of selected articles were discussed and a set of criteria for optimal measurement method of legal consciousness was introduced. Este artículo versa sobre la revisión sistemática de los métodos de conceptualización y medición de la conciencia jurídica, que puede entenderse como el equivalente de la legitimidad del derecho. La búsqueda sistemática identificó 2,054 artículos, que dio lugar a la inclusión de 156 artículos relevantes después de dos fases en el proceso de selección. Los artículos analizados carecían de una conceptualización clara del constructo de conciencia jurídica y de métodos validados de medición de suficiente calidad. Se vio que había bastantes posibilidades de mejorar tanto la conceptualización como los métodos de medición de la conciencia jurídica. Esta revisión encuentra seis componentes distintos de la conciencia jurídica (conocimiento general, habilidades, conocimiento específico, actitudes, confianza e identidad) y ofrece una definición unificadora e integral de la conciencia jurídica basada en esos componentes. Utilizando las características descriptivas y estadística inferencial se abordan los principales fallos metodológicos de los artículos seleccionados y se propone una serie de criterios de un método óptimo de medición de la conciencia jurídica.
New Contributions of Multidisciplinary and Empirical Approach to Legal Consciousness
The Lawyer Quarterly, 2019
This article introduces a legal consciousness construct consisting of six components (i.e., general legal knowledge, legal awareness, ad hoc legal knowledge, opinion about law, trust in law and legal identity) in individual and cross-cultural perspectives. It also offers two separate approaches to examining legal consciousness, namely legal consciousness as an empirical variable and legal consciousness as an input function of the legal system. The theoretical and methodological potential of legal consciousness as an example of multidisciplinary “behavioural legal science” and the possibilities of practical use of legal consciousness research are discussed in this article. The most relevant methodological, practical and ethical issues of legal consciousness research is also inspected.
Rule of Law: a Fundamental Concept Without a Coherent Meaning
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
The concept “rule of law” is used worldwide. However, the meaning of the concept varies, depending on several factors such as geography and history. This article provides a brief overview of how the concept is understood in the Swedish and Chinese legal contexts, by defining its different characteristics. The research confirms that the concept, which originates from the West, is used and perceived quite differently in the two countries. In fact, the use of different terminology, law-state thinking and socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics, confirm the differences in understanding.
Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law (review)
Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 2005
Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003, viii, 435 pages "Make yourself a stranger!" I recall those words clearly almost 40 years after they were uttered by my professor of comparative law. The message was twofold you can never know the other if you remain anchored in your own habits of thought and blind to your assumptions; just as importantly, you can never know yourself if you cannot know the other. Beyond Common Knowledge is primarily located within the first of these aspirations, but its message equally speaks to the second. The various authors of this collection are interested in one aspect of what Harry Arthurs calls the "globalization of the mind". They observe that there is an intensive global search for the "rule of law", the holy grail of good governance. This quest has led to wholesale exportation of western concepts of legality and judicial practice. But the authors enter a cautionary note about two large gaps that afflict thinking in this field. The first of these is the gap between theory and practice: between the ambitious programmes traced by the IMF, World Bank, NGOs and assorted do-gooders who think that they will lead to good governance (and its attendant economic prosperity), and the facts on the ground. The second, and more insidious because less visible, is the gap between the stated goals of individual programmes (what might be called "the practice in theory") sponsored by these organizations, and the actual activities (what might be called "the theory in practice") that are being funded. In brief, the authors conclude that we don't know what "rule of law" programmes are actually working, and we don't know why individual programmes succeed or fail. More troubling, we don't even really know what it means for a programme to succeed or fail. Most serious of all, we don't know how to design empirical studies of these issues, to frame questions and hypotheses that can be tested, and to carry out the research entailed by these hypotheses. Of course, answering all the issues raised in the preceding paragraph would require time, resources and coordination beyond the capacity of all but the most lavishly funded agencies and research teams. Hence the editors have set themselves a narrower task. They wish to focus on "rule of law" proposals that have as a target judicial reform. The collection comprises an Introduction and 11 chapters, four of which raise theoretical concerns, and six of which consider the empirical evidence from India, China, Chile and Mexico. The remaining essay considers general themes, but restricts its coverage to Latin America. At page three of the Introduction, the editors state: (…) at the very least, the chapters here encourage critical thinking about rule-of-law programs. A cautionary story that threads its way
Pitfalls of Measuring the Rule of Law
The recent demand for new measures of the rule of law confronts several meth- odological challenges. This article calls for careful attention to fundamental social science ideas of conceptualization and measurement in approaching the rule of law. Efforts to measure complex social phenomena such as the rule of law are chal- lenging, and thus require that researchers and policy makers pay attention to the cautionary rules of social science in their efforts. Violating these basic rules risks producing measures that are not reliable or valid, and could be a bad basis for policymaking. This paper demonstrates some of the pitfalls that rule of law re- searchers have fallen into and suggests improvements in measurement approaches.
Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 2020
This article reports on a conducted systematic review focused on conceptualization and measurement methods of legal consciousness, which can be understood as the equivalent for the legitimacy of law. A systematic search identified 2,054 articles, resulting in the inclusion of 156 relevant articles after two phases of the screening process. Articles analyzed lacked a clear conceptualization of a legal consciousness construct and validated methods of its measurement with satisfactory quality. A considerable room for improvement was found for both conceptualization and measurement methods of legal consciousness. This review identifies six separate components of legal consciousness (general knowledge, skills, specific knowledge, attitudes, trust, and identity) and offers a unifying and comprehensive definition of legal consciousness based on those components. Using descriptive characteristics and inference statistics, main methodological weaknesses of selected articles were discussed and a set of criteria for optimal measurement method of legal consciousness was introduced. Este artículo versa sobre la revisión sistemática de los métodos de conceptualización y medición de la conciencia jurídica, que puede entenderse como el equivalente de la legitimidad del derecho. La búsqueda sistemática identificó 2,054 artículos, que dio lugar a la inclusión de 156 artículos relevantes después de dos fases en el proceso de selección. Los artículos analizados carecían de una conceptualización clara del constructo de conciencia jurídica y de métodos validados de medición de suficiente calidad. Se vio que había bastantes posibilidades de mejorar tanto la conceptualización como los métodos de medición de la conciencia jurídica. Esta revisión encuentra seis componentes distintos de la conciencia jurídica (conocimiento general, habilidades, conocimiento específico, actitudes, confianza e identidad) y ofrece una definición unificadora e integral de la conciencia jurídica basada en esos componentes. Utilizando las características descriptivas y estadística inferencial se abordan los principales fallos metodológicos de los artículos seleccionados y se propone una serie de criterios de un método óptimo de medición de la conciencia jurídica.