Quantification of the impacts of rock mass quality on stope width control and pillar stability in a hard rock narrow reef mine (original) (raw)
Related papers
Assessment of Rock Engineering Risk Management Frameworks Used in Underground Mines
Malaysian Journal of Science and Advanced Technology
Over 40% percent of the accidents encountered at Unki Mines are related to ground failure and other geotechnical complications. This research sought to address the monetary losses incurred in revenue and productivity through absenteeism and injury. With the development of mine production in Zimbabwe, the depth of mines gradually increased, and the ecological environment developed complex conditions. Deep mining unlike shallow mining is characterized by extra ground pressure, more gas, and faster deformation rates. These factors affect the safety of mining production. Therefore, as the mining depth and breadth increase, the difficulty of mine rock engineering is also increasing. The deepening of mining depth and the improvement of the mechanization level have brought increasing difficulties regarding the stability of surrounding rock hence risk issues arise. The ultimate objective of this study was to ensure a robust design of support systems at Unki Mine that would eventually reduce...
Economic significance of geotechnical uncertainties in open pit mines
2019
The major cost associated with open pit mine operations is waste stripping. While the steepening of slope angles reduces the stripping ratio, and hence operational costs, it also increases the likelihood of failure. Major slope failures incur significant cost elements including clean-up, disruption to mine operation, and damage to mining equipment and in some cases loss of reserves. Geotechnical engineers are often faced with the difficult task of finding the balance between slope optimisation and acceptable risk related to the likelihood of large slope failures. Technological advancements have allowed for the development of larger and deeper open pit operations, but have also created higher economic impact from potential slope failures. Given that the aim of mining operators is to maximise overall profits, it is surprising that most slope designs are based on deterministic design approaches, and limited attention is given to quantifying uncertainties in the geotechnical model. As most major decisions in the mining industry are made by senior management staff and financial staff, any attempt on linking slope stability analysis results with monetary values would improve the critical communication between geotechnical designers and decision-makers. Using Cowal Gold Mine as a case study, this paper illustrates economic risk caused by geotechnical uncertainties. The geotechnical risk estimate is generally subjective due to geotechnical engineers having to rely on limited data and engineering judgement. Geotechnical risk is compared against economic factors that are often perceived as important variables in mining operations.
Geosynthetics risk-based design in mining
2014
Geosynthetics used in mining applications are subjected to harsh environments, yet in some cases are supposed to last forever. It is likely that geosynthetics will, sooner or later, fail due to harsh conditions, chemical/UV degradation, or re-polymerization under stress. In the short term, the probability of failure is dictated, as for any geostructure, by the variability of geo-materials parameters, variability of loading, duration of required performance, and site-specific conditions. The short-term design problem can be thought of as a “standard” geotechnical exercise, where standard risk-based decision-making (RBDM) approaches may be beneficial. On the basis of available knowledge, it is difficult to determine the longterm probability of failure of the geosynthetics and the structures incorporating them. The only thing we know is that it is likely they will, sooner or later fail; similarly to any other material, the longer the life span of the proposed structure, the higher the ...
REDUCING THE RISK TO A MINING PROJECT THROUGH TIMELY AND APPROPRIATE GEOTECHNICAL DATA COLLECTION
The authors' experience in mining projects has shown that during exploration and feasibility stages, significant emphasis is placed on allocating financial resources to determine the extent and value of the mineral resource, with very little or no emphasis being given to ensuring that relevant geotechnical information is captured during the same activity. Extensive geological logging of the boreholes is conducted on exploration boreholes, and often the only geotechnical parameters captured during this exercise are the Total Core Recovery and the Rock Quality Designation. By the time the geotechnical logging of boreholes is conducted, the core has generally degenerated due to being exposed to harsh climatic conditions, the mineralised zone has been split and core trays misplaced. In many cases, this results in the project failing to progress through the stage gates in the project cycle, requiring the drilling, logging and removal of samples from additional, dedicated geotechnical boreholes; incurring both financial cost and time delays. Should an appropriately developed geotechnical data collection programme be conducted concurrent with the exploration drilling and logging, these additional costs and delays may be averted. Examples of project delays, or significant changes to projects, associated with inadequate geotechnical data collection and associated incorrect assumptions, are highlighted. INTRODUCTION The path of mining projects from the initiation of the exploration phase to operating mines is a long, costly and very often frustrating one to follow. Not all projects progress through to project execution-many undergo repeated study levels in the hope of optimising the project's financial returns and hence securing funding, or are terminated due to the project not meeting various hurdles or criteria set by legislature or company officers; e.g. financial, legal, market, technical or practical. Both greenfield and brownfield mining projects require substantial resources, all of which have a financial impact on the project. Capital funding may be sourced internally within the organisation, sourced externally by the issuing of shares, or obtained through loans from financial/funding institutions or trusts. Ultimately, the source of the funding (shareholder/ financial institution/fund) carries the financial risk of the project. Potential risks and opportunities should therefore be identified early in the project life-cycle so that better-informed decisions are able to be made regarding the viability of the project, and hence investment potential. Barsi (2014) identified that " traditional approached to advancing mining projects typically do not take into account a broad view of all the critical engineering, environmental, and social aspect in the early stages. As a result, many projects fail to gain a thorough understanding of risks, and how these can significantly impact on timing and profit potential ". The aim of this paper is not to study the cause of projects being delayed or terminated, but rather to address a technical shortfall in many projects with which the authors have been involved, often resulting in the projects being delayed. This shortfall pertains to the availability, quality and quantity of geotechnical data for rock engineering, and hence mine, design. In many of the instances, the projects have been delayed for several years whilst this data is collected, the delay generally caused by the inability to (a) mobilise drill rigs, (b) conduct geotechnical drilling and logging, or (c) secure additional funding for the geotechnical data collection programme. This could, and often does, impact on the success of the projects, particularly in the current mining market where project finance is not easily available and volatility in metals prices does not easily attract shareholder investment. It is acknowledged that projects do exist where sufficient quality and quality of appropriate data has been collected, allowing projects to advance though the project cycle fairly seamlessly. However, this paper identifies common shortfalls identified in the quantity and quality of geotechnical data, and how this may delay the project. IDENTIFYING THE ISSUE
Proceedings of the International Conference on Mine Closure, 2022
For open pit mining, understanding and managing slope performance is critical for both operations and closure. Towards the end of mine life, achieving reliability of slope performance in operations often necessitates real-time implementation of active slope stabilisation controls. This situation changes significantly towards closure, when production economics are no longer the priority, and resources for field monitoring control and active slope management diminish. The risk profile also shifts to a greater focus on stakeholder needs, including the environment and social acceptance, as land use changes. Although risk profiles will shift, the safety goal of 'zero harm' needs to continue to be achieved through all phases. Historically, most final pit slopes were not designed for closure. Rather, they tended to be optimised for production efficiency and thus were typically too steep for long-term reliability. The key question then becomes-what happens when the controls that have been put in place for maintaining their stability are decommissioned for closure? With sufficient understanding gained during operations, it may be possible to adequately forecast behaviour and define a Design Acceptance Criteria appropriate for the slope, for post-closure, once operational controls are decommissioned. This paper is hoped will help address this dichotomy and provides suggestions to meet industry objectives. It is also intended to promote discussion on this transition, such that industry and regulator perspectives can be accommodated alongside each other within the forthcoming Large Open Pit (LOP) Guidelines for Mine Closure handbook publication, currently in preparation under the auspices of the LOP initiative.
Reliability and safety, and the risk of construction damage in mining areas
E3S Web of Conferences
This article concerns the reliability and safety of building structures in mining areas, with a particular emphasis on the quantitative risk analysis of buildings. The issues of threat assessment and risk estimation, in the design of facilities in mining exploitation areas, are presented here, indicating the difficulties and ambiguities associated with their quantification and quantitative analysis. This article presents the concept of quantitative risk assessment of the impact of mining exploitation, in accordance with ISO 13824 [1]. The risk analysis is illustrated through an example of a construction located within an area affected by mining exploitation.
A risk quantification framework for strategic mine planning: method and application
Quantification, assessment and management of orebody uncertainty is critical to strategic mine planning. A method consisting of a series of steps for uncertainty quantification and risk assessment in pit design optimization is outlined here. Multiple simulated scenarios of an orebody's grade distribution are processed through an established pit optimization approach to produce a distribution of possible outcomes in terms of key project indicators. These indicators are then assessed to support mine planning decisions.
Risk management in open cut coal mines
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2013
There are a number of geotechnical systems used at open cut operations of Anglo American's Metallurgical Coal business unit in Australia. These systems are mainly mine site specific, based on geological information and used as hazard plans. They are qualitative and reliant upon the experienced judgement of site based engineers and the general workforce. They are not suitable for calculating the associated risks of geological structures and mining responses. A uniform risk rating system that can be used to provide an unbiased, standard and quantifiable assessment of the risk from highwall and lowwall failures is therefore developed using the experience gained with such systems in Anglo American's South African operations. This system is a semi-quantitative risk rating system and takes into account the relative differences in the importance of hazards as experienced at each mine site as a result of different combinations of geotechnical factors and mining conditions. It is based on critical geotechnical and other parameters that have been identified by site mining engineers, geologists and geotechnical engineers. The primary advantage of this risk rating system is that all open cut mines in the Anglo American's Metallurgical Coal operations use a near identical system, which enables the user to compare the risk after each blast and with other mines. The system can be adjusted to meet local mine specific requirements. The implementation of this system, a computer program that automatically calculates the risks and recommends predetermined controls, has been made as practical and as easy to use as possible. This program can be used by personnel from other mining disciplines not directly related to geotechnical engineering.
The stability of slopes and underground excavations is generally affected by the geologic structure that exists in the rock mass, and whether or not the influence of these has been adequately assessed. Whether or not instability will arise from the presence of the structures depends on the tectonic events that resulted in the formation of the structure, the orientation, characteristics (width, infill, strength, ability to dissipate strain energy, etc.), and the effect of mining-induced stress on the structure which either enhances or reduces stability. Three case studies are presented where the influence of geologic structures resulted in major instability in Southern African and Canadian underground mines; one case resulting in a mining layout and support system change, a second resulting in a support system change and the third resulting in the collapse of a mine, necessitating redevelopment and sterilisation of ore. CASE STUDIES 1 AND 2: PLATINUM AND DIAMOND MINES Introduction Both a platinum mine in Southern Africa and a diamond mine in North America experienced similar instability associated with a weak (shear) layer in either the pillar foundation or within the pillar itself. In the one instance, the instability initially presented itself as footwall heave, unravelling of the pillar walls and eventually causing a pillar run which resulted in a collapse of the underground workings. In the second instance, the initial instability comprised slabbing of the pillar walls below the weak layer, and footwall heave was observed in another less-frequently accessed roadway. Unfortunately, the long-term effect of this failure mode could not be assessed as the mine has since closed due to economic reasons.
Abandoned metal mine stability risk evaluation
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2009
The abandoned mine legacy is critical in many countries around the world, where mine cave-ins and surface subsidence disruptions are perpetual risks that can affect the population, infrastructure, historical legacies, land use, and the environment. This article establishes abandoned metal mine failure risk evaluation approaches and quantification techniques based on the Canadian mining experience. These utilize clear geomechanics considerations such as failure mechanisms, which are dependent on well-defined rock mass parameters. Quantified risk is computed using probability of failure (probabilistics using limit-equilibrium factors of safety or applicable numerical modeling factor of safety quantifications) times a consequence impact value. Semi-quantified risk can be based on failure-case-study-based empirical data used in calculating probability of failure, and personal experience can provide qualified hazard and impact consequence assessments. The article provides outlines for la...