Efficacy of Biologics for Ligamentous and Tendon Healing (original) (raw)
Related papers
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2014
a b s t r a c t 6 a r t i c l e i n f o 7 8 Available online xxxx 9 Keywords: 10 Tendon Q8 11 Tendon repair, growth factors 12 Cell-based therapy 13 Mesenchymal stem cells 14 Embryonic stem cells 15 Tendon-derived cells 16 Tendon stem/progenitor cells 17 Natural biomaterials 18 Gene therapy 19 20
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2011
Objective: To evaluate, through a systematic review of the current literature, the evidence-based outcomes of the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of tendon and ligament injuries. studies were excluded. Tissue engineering strategies, which included a combination of PRP with additional cell types (bone marrow), were also excluded. Articles with all levels of evidence were included. Thirteen of 32 retrieved articles respected the inclusion criteria.
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2015
To summarize clinical studies after platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy for tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy, and muscle injuries; to review PRP formulations used across studies; and to identify knowledge deficits that require further investigation. After a systematic review in PubMed, we identified clinical studies assessing PRP efficacy in tendon and muscle during the past decade. We standardized data extraction by grouping studies based on anatomic location; summarized patient populations, PRP formulations, and clinical outcomes; and identified knowledge deficits that require further investigation. Overall, 1,541 patients had been treated with PRP in 58 clinical studies; of these, 26 addressed upper limb tendinopathies and 32 addressed the lower limb (810 patients and 731 patients treated with PRP, respectively). The quality of research is higher for the upper limb than for the lower limb (23 controlled studies, of which 17 are Level I, v 19 controlled studies, of which 6 are Lev...
The role of regenerative medicine in the treatment of sports injuries
Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 2014
Traditional treatment of sports injuries includes use of the PRICE principle (Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, physical therapy modalities, and corticosteroid injections. Recent evidence has raised concerns over this traditional treatment approach regarding the use of anti-inflammatories and injectable corticosteroids. More recent treatments, known as regenerative medicine, include platelet-rich plasma and stem cell therapies. Evidence for their efficacy in a variety of sports injuries has emerged, ranging from tendinopathy and muscle tears to ligament and chondral injuries. This article reviews the literature regarding established treatments for sports injuries and these more innovative treatments.
Biologic and Tissue Engineering Strategies for Tendon Repair
Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, 2016
This review summarizes recent developments in biologic treatments-including growth factors, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), stem cells, and cell-seeded scaffolds-for tendon repair. Growth and differentiation faction-5 (GDF-5), insulin-related growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) all improved extracellular matrix (ECM) production and tensile strength of treated tendons; however, no clinical trials were done on GDF-5. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) improved proliferation and ECM production, but did not consistently improve mechanical properties. The literature was mixed on the efficacy of PRP for the treatment of chronic and acute tendinopathies. However, PRP did cause any complications, and its benefits may be enhanced once an ideal, standardized composition is developed. Therefore, PRP may be a valid treatment, especially once nonsurgical management options have failed. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) significantly and substantially improved the quality of tendon repairs and demonstrated the ability to regenerate an enthesis. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have similar effects and are easier to harvest. The periosteum may also regenerate the tendon-bone attachment. Tenocytes, meanwhile, may be ideal for midsubstance tendon repairs. Cell-seeded scaffolds-especially ECMderived scaffolds-were demonstrated to improve ECM production, enhancing the healing abilities of tenocytes or stem cells while providing early mechanical support to healing tendons. Each of these treatments demonstrated enhanced healing compared to common surgical techniques; moreover, patient outcomes may be enhanced by combining these treatments. Lay Summary Tendon injuries are very prevalent and can be debilitating. Tendon heals poorly, and the scar tissue that forms is weak and susceptible to reinjury. A major focus of orthopedic research is regenerative medicine, encouraging the formation of healthy tendon rather than mechanically inferior scar tissue. This review summarizes the recent scientific literature on biologic treatments for tendon repair, such as growth factors, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells. The purpose of which is to show which treatments are promising candidates for clinical use and research, helping to guide physicians and to lay out a path for future research.
Biologics in Achilles tendon healing and repair: a review
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2015
Injuries of the Achilles tendon are relatively common with potentially devastating outcomes. Healing Achilles tendons form a fibrovascular scar resulting in a tendon which may be mechanically weaker than the native tendon. The resulting strength deficit causes a high risk for reinjury and other complications. Treatments using biologics aim to restore the normal properties of the native tendon and reduce the risk of rerupture and maximize tendon function. The purpose of this review was to summarize the current findings of various therapies using biologics in an attempt to improve the prognosis of Achilles tendon ruptures and tendinopathies. A PubMed search was performed using specific search terms. The search was open for original manuscripts and review papers limited to publication within the last 10 years. From these searches, papers were included in the review if they investigated the effects of biological augmentation on Achilles tendon repair or healing. Platelet-rich plasma may assist in the healing process of Achilles tendon ruptures, while the evidence to support its use in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathies remains insufficient. The use of growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor, recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB, interleukin-6, and transforming growth factor beta as well as several bone morphogenetic proteins have shown promising results for Achilles tendon repair. In vitro and preclinical studies have indicated the potential effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate as well. Stem cells also have positive effects on Achilles tendon h e a l i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y d u r i n g t h e e a r l y p h a s e s. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), decellularized tendon tissue, and porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) are biomaterials which have shown promising results as scaffolds used in Achilles tendon repair. The application of biological augmentation techniques in Achilles tendon repair appears promising; however, several techniques require further investigation to evaluate their clinical application. Keywords Biologics. Platelet-rich plasma. Bone marrow aspirate. Bone morphogenetic protein. Stem cells. Growth factor. Scaffold. Achilles This article is part of the Topical Collection on Biological Adjuvants in Orthopedic Surgery