The effect of ankle joint mobility when using an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO) on energy consumption in people with spinal cord injury: preliminary results (original) (raw)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of walking with isocentric reciprocating gait orthoses (IRGOs) utilizing two designs of ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) on specific outcome measures in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Four volunteer SCI subjects participated in this study, and were fitted with an IRGO equipped with either solid or dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs in a randomized order. Subjects walked at their self-selected speed along a flat walkway to enable a comparison of walking speed, endurance and the resulting physiological cost index (PCI) to be performed. RESULTS: Increased walking speed, increased distance walked and less PCI were demonstrated in walking with the IRGO incorporating dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs as compared to walking with an IRGO plus solid AFO as a control condition. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that people with SCI could walk at relatively higher speeds and with greater endurance and a reduced PCI when utilizing an IRGO with dorsiflexion-assisted AFO components compared to solid ones. It is therefore concluded that the IRGO incorporating dorsiflexion-assisted AFOs may be an effective alternative in helping to reduce the energy consumption experienced by people with SCI.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (29)

  1. Arazpour M, Bani MA, Hutchins SW. Reciprocal gait orthoses and powered gait orthoses for walking by spinal cord injury patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 14-21.
  2. Ahmadi Bani M, Arazpour M, Farahmand F, Mousavi ME, Hutchins SW. The efficiency of mechanical orthoses in affecting parameters associated with daily living in spinal cord injury patients: a literature review. Disab Rehab Assist Technol 2015; 10: 183-190.
  3. Arazpour M, Bani MA, Kashani RV, Ghomshe FT, Mousavi ME, Hutchins SW. Effect of powered gait orthosis on walking in individuals with paraplegia. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 261-267.
  4. Arazpour M, Chitsazan A, Hutchins SW, Ghomshe FT, Mousavi ME, Takamjani EE et al. Design and simulation of a new powered gait orthosis for paraplegic patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 125-130.
  5. Arazpour M, Chitsazan A, Hutchins SW, Ghomshe FT, Mousavi ME, Takamjani EE et al. Evaluation of a novel powered hip orthosis for walking by a spinal cord injury patient: a single case study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 105-112.
  6. Arazpour M, Chitsazan A, Hutchins SW, Mousavi ME, Takamjani EE, Ghomshe FT et al. Evaluation of a novel powered gait orthosis for walking by a spinal cord injury patient. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 239-246.
  7. Meinders M, Gitter A, Czerniecki J. The role of ankle plantar flexor muscle work during walking. Scand J Rehab Med 1998; 30: 39-46.
  8. Kuo AD, Donelan JM, Ruina A. Energetic consequences of walking like an inverted pendulum: step-to-step transitions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005; 33: 88-97.
  9. 9 Neptune RR, Kautz S, Zajac F. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1387-1398.
  10. Gottschall JS, Kram R. Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 1766-1772.
  11. Donelan JM, Kram R, Kuo AD. Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. J Exp Biol 2002; 205: 3717-3727.
  12. Grey MJ, Mazzaro N, Nielsen JB, Sinkjaer T. Ankle extensor proprioceptors contribute to the enhancement of the soleus EMG during the stance phase of human walking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004; 82: 610-616.
  13. Dietz V, Müller R, Colombo G. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 2002; 125: 2626-2634.
  14. Arazpour M, Samadian M, Bahramizadeh M, Joghtaei M, Maleki M, Bani MA et al. The efficiency of orthotic interventions on energy consumption in paraplegic patients: a literature review. Spinal Cord 2015; 53: 168-175.
  15. Bani MA, Arazpour M, Ghomshe FT, Mousavi ME, Hutchins SW. Gait evaluation of the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis with solid versus dorsi flexion assist ankle foot orthoses in paraplegic patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 161-167.
  16. Genda E, Oota K, Suzuki Y, Koyama K, Kasahara T. A new walking orthosis for paraplegics: hip and ankle linkage system. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28: 69-74.
  17. Kawashima N, Sone Y, Nakazawa K, Akai M, Yano H. Energy expenditure during walking with weight-bearing control (WBC) orthosis in thoracic level of paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 506-510.
  18. Arazpour M, Bani M, Hutchins S, Curran S, Javanshir M. The influence of ankle joint mobility when using an orthosis on stability in patients with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2013; 51: 750-754.
  19. Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno J, Donovan WH, Ducker TB et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 266-274.
  20. Bani MA, Arazpour M, Ghomshe FT, Mousavi ME, Hutchins SW. Gait evaluation of the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis with solid versus dorsi flexion assist ankle foot orthoses in paraplegic patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 37: 161-167.
  21. Leung A, Wong A, Wong E, Hutchins S. The physiological cost index of walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis among patients with T 12-L 1 spinal cord injury. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 61-68.
  22. Arazpour M, Bani M, Hutchins S, Jones R. The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2012; 51: 356-359.
  23. Nene A, Jennings S. Physiological cost index of paraplegic locomotion using the ORLAU ParaWalker. Spinal Cord 1992; 30: 246-252.
  24. Graham RC, Smith NM, White CM. The reliability and validity of the physiological cost index in healthy subjects while walking on 2 different tracks. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005; 86: 2041-2046.
  25. Bar-On Z, Nene A. Relationship between heart rate and oxygen uptake in thoracic level paraplegics. Spinal Cord 1990; 28: 87-95.
  26. Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Todd F. Human Walking. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1981.
  27. Waters R, Barnes G, Husserl T, Silver L, Liss R. Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle. J Bone Jt Surg 1988; 70: 1032-1037.
  28. Waters RL, Mulroy S. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait Posture 1999; 9: 207-231.
  29. Fowler PT, Botte MJ, Mathewson JW, Speth SR, Byrne TP, Sutherland DH. Energy cost of ambulation with different methods of foot and ankle immobilization. J Orthopaed Res 1993; 11: 416-421.