Ideological Presuppositions in Media Coverage of Corporation Tax Policy in the UK and Ireland: A Critical Discourse Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
How can governments tax multinational enterprises more fairly? A discourse analysis
Policy & Politics, 2021
Extant research has identified numerous causes for multinational enterprises (MNE) tax avoidance and formulated a variety of remedial policy solutions. Yet despite being consistently decried as societally unfair, these contested practices persist. We reveal the conflicting and complementary ideologies and worldviews that reside in the background of MNE tax avoidance policy deliberations. Analysis of primary interviews with accounting and tax regulatory agencies, Members of the UK Parliament, and public hearings with MNE representatives, shows these different groups draw on four different discourses: globalism, idealism, pragmatism and shareholder interest. These exist in what we show to be a kind of precarious truce that allows these contested practices to continue in the face of robust critique. Prospects for taxing MNEs are enhanced if legislators, civil servants and regulators can draw more coherently on the discourse of idealism because this is most resistant to the logic of the...
The UK Press and Corporation Tax: learning lessons from Ireland
2013
This article analyses comment and editorial in the right-of-centre UK press concerning Ireland’s economic policy. This is considered in the context of academic analysis of the Irish economy. Using content analysis, it shows that business comment shared overwhelmingly the UK Conservative Party leadership’s view that lowering corporate tax was central to Ireland’s ‘economic miracle’, and tended to advocate policy transfer to the UK. The views expressed in the newspaper articles are contrasted with the academics' work. Furthermore, the piece suggests that by urging for the UK to adopt Ireland’s strategy of tax reduction in order to seek foreign direct investment, the columnists addressed a traditional focus of investor interests, while downplaying other factors leading to Ireland’s growth and later downturn.
Corporate taxation, corporate power, and corporate harm
Globalisation has increased corporate tax competition amongst states and facilitated widespread corporate tax avoidance. Some of the largest businesses now pay little or no tax: in some cases with the active assistance of governments. This article examines contemporary corporation tax policies, outlines some of the key methods corporations use to minimise their tax liabilities, explores the interdependencies between the demand for reduced tax liabilities and the professional infrastructure of tax planning and avoidance, and examines how the contemporary political economy of corporate taxation enhances the bargaining power of transnational corporations in the implementation of tax policy.
Cooking a corporation tax controversy: Apple, Ireland and the EU
Critical Discourse Studies, 2019
Given the centrality of corporations in distribution of income and wealth studies, discursive constructions of corporate taxation are essential to understanding the production of inequality. The focus of this study is an interview with Apple's Chief Executive Tim Cook on the Irish state broadcaster, Raidió Teilifís Éireann's (RTÉ) flagship news programme, Morning Ireland, following the ruling by the European Commission (EC) on the corporation tax arrangements between Apple Inc. and Ireland. Drawing on a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach, a frame analysis is provided. The significance and extent of the EC's ruling has potential implications for corporation taxation policy, within and beyond the European Union (EU), which provides a timely reflection in the Brexit era and in the context of rising economic nationalism generally. Thus, the discursive construction of this ruling in the media is of importance in understanding how inequality is produced and reproduced, and journalism's role therein.
Planned Economies? : Corporations, Tax Avoidance and World Politics
2018
approaches, the key question I pose here is how should the world-political role of corporations be understood? An interesting departure point for this is the work of Roberto Mangabeira Unger, who has defined politics as a "struggle over material and passionate relationships over resources and arrangements of our everyday lives" (Unger, 1987, p. 145). This differs from the widely used conception of politics by Chantal Mouffe, who has defined it as an "ensemble of practices, discourses and institutions which seek to establish a certain order and organize human coexistence in conditions that are always potentially conflictual because they are affected by the dimension of 'the political'." The political in turn is characterized by a "dimension of antagonism that is inherent in human relations" (Mouffe, 1999, p. 15). Compared to Mouffe's account, Unger's conception directs the attention more to the material issues rather than to searching for "antagonisms" in society. However, by taking into account our "passionate relations", Unger avoids defining politics in entirely materialist terms. Giddens (1984, pp. xxxi-xxxii) introduced the concept of "transformation points" that "translate" private property and a cluster of ownership rights into industrial authority or modes of sustaining managerial control. I maintain that the strict separation of states and markets is a key element sustaining this transformation and preventing its opening up to competing claims of authority. Specifically, understanding corporations as potentially political actors could expose them to demands that are normally valid only in the democratic sphere. In this sense, my dissertation includes a normative aspect. By raising new questions on the nature of corporate power, this project could also be seen as emancipatory (Sayer, 2000, p. 18) or liberating (Manicas, 1987, p. 321). Unger's conception of politics allows us to transcend strict and somewhat artificial state-market divisions (Teivainen, 2002). Specifically, I focus on corporate tax avoidance mechanisms to demonstrate how not only states, but also companies can engage in struggles over material relationships. For example, a major mining company in a small developing country might have a large influence over that state's ability to decide on material relationships through normal democratic processes. I also draw on the tradition of critical realism, which emerged initially from a rigorous critique of positivism in the natural sciences. In line with positivists, critical realists are "naturalists" in the sense that it is "both possible and desirable to study social phenomena 'scientifically'" (Potter & López, 2001, p. 8). However, even though there are causal mechanisms at play in our shared world, our understanding of them is always shaped by language. Therefore, we can never obtain completely neutral information about the world. As Sayer (2000, p. 16) has noted, "typically, social scientists are dealing not only with systems that are open but ones in which there are many interacting structures and mechanisms." "This creates the risk of attributing to one mechanism (and its structure) effects which are actually due to another." Consequently, there is
Indeterminacy, Complexity, Technocracy and the Reform of International Corporate Taxation
Social Legal Studies, 2015
Recent public concerns and publicity about the extent of tax avoidance by some of the largest and most respected transnational corporations (TNCs) have prompted numerous parliamentary inquiries and intergovernmental initiatives. Among the questions raised during hearings in the UK House of Lords in 2013 1 were whether such avoidance could be more effectively prevented either by a reduction in the complexity of the rules, or by a more aggressive interpretation of those rules by tax authorities. These questions raised issues concerning the complexity and interpretation of law, which received interestingly different responses from the academics to whom they were posed, and they merit closer examination, which is the aim of this paper. It begins by discussing some types of complexity, and then considers how these are rooted in the indeterminacy of legal language, and the sociology and politics of the interpretive communities concerned. The main part applies this analysis to the historical development of international tax rules, seen in the context of these current pressures and initiatives for reform of international corporate taxation.
" Our tax system should be… " – Tracing the evolution of norms guiding tax policy
" Our tax system should be…fair, efficient, redistributive, enhancing welfare… " , but also " pro-growth, flat, competitive, favoring business… ". These are only a few examples of statements politicians have made about the principles of tax policy. Of course, a tax system can be all those things, but not all at once. Hence, those statements reveal something about the dominant norms guiding tax policy. Is justice the purpose of tax policy? Or competitiveness? The incapacity of major powers to effectively ban tax evasion and tax avoidance (at least until recently) appears puzzling, as the labeled adversaries are mostly very small states without any economic weight. Focusing on norms can help to understand the issue: In 2004, Michael Webb pointed to transnational corporations as dominant voices in the discourse about tax policy and to prevailing norms among US policymakers that rather favored a " race to the bottom " in taxation than effective international regulation. In the last years, something has changed: Civil society groups have called for tax justice and major events such as the financial crisis and the Panama papers have influenced public opinion. And indeed, some of the recent evolutions in international tax policy such as Automatic Information Exchange and the BEPS project look promising. However, the sustainability of these measures depends on a sustained will of major states to enforce them, which in turn is favored by a shift of the dominant norms guiding tax policy. This paper attempts to find out whether such a norm-shift is about to occur. Using both qualitative and quantitative text-mining methods, general statements on tax policy by American politicians are identified in several thousand press articles and government sources covering the time span from 1997 to 2017 and their normative content is compared over time. The analysis reveals that neoliberal norms are still dominant in the American tax policy discourse , where as they cannot claim exclusivity. Most significant is the rise of economic nationalism over the last twenty years. Keywords: tax policy norms – race to the bottom – content analysis
Into the limelight: tax haven Ireland
Irish Marxist Review, 2016
The political establishment are appealing against the EU Commission’s ruling that Apple should pay e13 billion to Irish taxpayers - plus interest that will amount to between an extra e5 and e6 billion. They cite the ‘reputational damage’ that might follow acceptance of such a ruling. There was not, however, a similar level of concern when the UN found that Ireland’s ban on abortion in the case of fatal foetal abnormality constituted ‘cruel, inhuman and degrading’ treatment. The linking of the interest of the Irish state to those of a global corporation is only an accentuation of an already established pattern. The state has a long established pattern of handing over its natural resources to foreign multi-nationals. It scores remarkably well on the Heritage Foundation’s, ‘Freedom Index’. It comes in eighth place in the world’s wish list for neoliberal wonderlands.
State-induced, Strategic, or Toxic? An ethical analysis of Tax Avoidance practices
Abstract: Tax avoidance practices by Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) such as Google, Microsoft, Apple, Starbucks and others are increasingly under scrutiny both from a legal and an ethical perspective. In 2013, the OECD launched an ‘Action Plan’ to encourage the G20 countries to address Base Erosion and Profit Shifting through an internationally co-ordinated approach, arguing that tax avoidance represents a risk for tax revenues and tax fairness, potentially “undermining taxpayers voluntary compliance.” The analysis of tax avoidance in the existing business ethics literature suffers from a black-and-white approach, contending either that tax avoidance is unethical (e.g. Prebble and Prebble 2010) or that, being legal, tax avoidance is also ethical (e.g. Houghton 1979). However, we believe that within tax avoidance practices there are important distinctions to be made. In this paper, we analyze the ethics of tax avoidance by identifying three different forms of avoidance practices: state-induced, strategic, and toxic avoidance. We develop a more nuanced approach reviewing both the ethical arguments in defense and the ethical issues associated with each form of tax avoidance. Finally, we propose an ethical framework that could assist executives and policy-makers in their decision-making concerning tax avoidance.
Tax havens and tax avoidance have gathered much interest, e.g., in the United Nations (UN) negotiations on the post-2015 development goals. The analyses of initiatives against corporate tax avoidance typically focus on developments from the mid-1990s onward. This article shows that contrary to the common perception, the country-by-country reporting initiative and many of the other contemporary policy responses had already been developed and discussed in the 1970s by the United Nations Commission and Centre for Transnational Corporations. I demonstrate how the weakening of the policy community of the UN and the failure of the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to refer to the earlier discussions, not only in the UN but also in the OECD, contributed to the passing into oblivion of these ideas. Other factors were the reframing of the UN work on multinational enterprises to human rights issues and the transformation of academic theories of the firm. The examples demonstrate how ideas shape world politics and how the oblivion of certain ideas can have concrete impacts on the power relations between its actors. The oblivion of the earlier debates paved the way for the triumph of more business-friendly discourses centred on the anti-corruption and corporate social responsibility arguments.