Bringing in the Body: Personhood in the Shadow of the Death Penalty (original) (raw)
Related papers
The 'Body' in Jail: Experiences, Meanings and Identity
2004
The modern idea of imprisonment in the West seems to have intentionally portrayed corporal punishment as threatening. It was the foundation and the fulcrum of the principle of ‘humanisation’ of prisons. At the basis of this principle there is a common dichotomy: ‘mind’ and ‘body’ as two distinct things. This occurs so frequently that it might be thought that suffering of the mind (or soul) due to the deprivation of liberty is not comparable to the suffering of the flesh, to physical harm. Can there be, however, an obvious comparison? Behind a seemingly unbloody appearance, assuming a monist rather than dualist point of view, detentive punishment can take on a very different aspect. People who have gone through this experience speak of it as one which involves the person in their entirety and which can be described in the domains of both language and knowledge, mental and physical. “Life changes here” is an expression which could become global: people speak of this change and often t...
A recent YouGov poll conducted to mark 50 years since the last hangings in Britain showed continuing falls in the level of public support for capital punishment . No politician would today consider trying to get a free vote in Parliament for restoration. Nevertheless, 45 per cent of respondents remained in favour of capital punishment. In this meticulously researched book, Lizzie Seal traces the development of public opinion on the matter from the beginning of the 20th century to the recent period and the continually divided nature of public opinion is one of her key themes.
Capital Punishment and the Citizen-Subject
American Literary History, 2015
So much has been written and said on the subject of capital punishments," opined the Philadelphia Repertory in 1812, "that it looks almost like presumptive vanity to pursue the topic any farther" (qtd. in Banner 112). By the early-nineteenth century, Americans felt that all points of debate for or against the death penalty had been made. Yet two centuries later, David Garland notes that "there has been no let up in writing and talking about [the death penalty]": "the one thing that is indisputable is that the death penalty produces an endless stream of discourse," and he vividly conjures up the "bookstore shelves and law library stacks" that "groan under the weight of writing provoked by this institution" (9). The groaning in certain sections of those libraries, however, is not only occasioned by the evergrowing number of criticisms and defenses of the death penalty that almost each generation of Americans has produced since Benjamin Rush published Considerations on the Injustice and Impolity of Punishing Murder by Death (1792). The commentary on this debate and criticism of the legal, sociopolitical, literary, or (auto)biographical writing that has accompanied the death penalty since colonial times, and that has come to be seen as "an intrinsic part of the institution" (Garland 14), has considerably added to the weight that makes the shelves bow. What then, one wonders, can three new monographs and an edited collection that fall into the latter category add to our understanding of capital punishment's "cultural life" (Sarat "The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment") that isn't already on those shelves? Like all legal forms of punishment, the death penalty depends on culture to imbue it-or the desire for its abolition-with legitimacy and meaning. The death penalty's legal framework and
Photographing prisoners: The unworthy, unpleasant and unchanging criminal body
The use of photography in representing the criminal body has long been a focus of interest in the social sciences, especially so when exploring the historical evolution of criminal identification practices. By contributing to the emerging field of visual criminology, this article explores current practices around photography of prisoners in the everyday contexts of the prison space. Drawing on a qualitative study conducted with prisoners, prison guards and probation officers in three Portuguese prisons, we analyse how different social actors construct the criminal body. This construction is explored through the meanings attributed to prisoners' photographic portraits used for their identification. In particular, we discuss how their photographic documentation acts as a classification device and a visual representation of the criminal. We argue that this representation, by portraying elements of unworthiness, unpleasantness and immutability, plays a significant role in the parole board's decisions and produce an embodied sense of identity and perpetuation of stigma.
Introduction: The Deathscapes of Incarceration
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 2016
Introduction: The Deathscapes of Incarceration This special issue is dedicated to reflections on the deathscapes of incarceration, bringing together contributions that explore death either as an unintentional result of incarceration, or as its probable or inevitable consequence. Deathscapes in recent work by human geographers encompass 'places associated with death and for the dead and their meanings and associations' (Maddrell & Sidaway, 2012, p. 5). Imprisonment can be said to be one of those sites/conditions where death and bereavement are intensified; for those inside (especially the vulnerable, old, ill or life prisoners) the spacetime of prison (see Moran, 2012) is inscribed with the prospect of death, the contemplation of death and with the deaths of others. In some contexts (such as Life without Parole and life limited sentences) prisons are also part of a penal deathscape, marking the production of naturalized death in punishment and the memoralisation of life and death in penal hell holes in popular culture (Jewkes, 2014).
For the last twenty years, you have been able to buy body parts of criminals on the internet. Through repeated exposure to the corpse in popular culture, the boundaries between real and facsimile are blurring when it comes to the cadaver, but ‘murderabilia’, a consumeristic arm of ‘dark tourism’, is often sold as the most authentic way to consume crime in the culture industry. Foltyn argues that in the process of consuming death, we are ‘creating corpse facts and fictions’ (Foltyn, 2008, p. 155). With regards to murderabilia, my contribution offers the concept of ‘selective memory’ as a way to understand how positive histories are enhanced in posthumous representations of criminal. A ‘selective memory’ augments these corpse fictions, more than the facts, making for lopsided representations of the criminal corpse. This paper of three parts analyses historical commodification of the criminal corpse, arguing that being dead has often been a prerequisite of achieving notoriety for criminals. Second, a case study of Charles Manson is used to showcase the brand-like qualities attached to successful criminal celebrities. Third, this case study is continued through news-media representations, to show that the criminal corpse is recalled with a ‘selective memory’, missing violent aspects and focussing instead on brand.
The Suffering Dead: Bio-politics, Social Solidarity, and Monstrous Offenders
Death has historically been viewed as the great equalizer in Western thought. However, as traditional Christian notions regarding death and the afterlife have diminished in public life death has taken on a different cultural narrative. By employing a Foucauldian frame of violence and power, a Durkheimian analysis of social solidarity, the philosophical views of Schpenhauer, the work of Horkheimer and Adorno, and various works from critical legal scholars this paper explores a possible relationship between the sovereign and cultural narratives of death. By situating the analysis around the cultural production of ghost hunting in abandoned prisons this paper adds to a growing body of critical theory that seeks to explore an invisible world created by (wo)men in the face of monstrosity.