The Right to Privacy under Pressure (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2017
Human Rights Council Twenty-seventh session Agenda items 2 and 3 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development The right to privacy in the digital age Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary In its resolution 68/167, the General Assembly requested the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to submit a report on the protection and promotion of the right to privacy in the context of domestic and extraterritorial surveillance and/or the interception of digital communications and the collection of personal data, including on a mass scale, to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-seventh session and to the General Assembly at its sixty-ninth session, with views and recommendations, to be considered by Member States. The present report is submitted pursuant to that request. The Office of the High Commissioner will also submit the report to the General Assembly at its sixty-ninth session, pursuant to the request of the Assembly.
The Human Right of Privacy in the Digital Age
2017
The right to privacy in the digital age generates new challenges for the international jurisdiction. The following article deals with such challenges. Therefore it firstly defines the term of privacy in general and presents an international legal framework. With whisteblower Snowden a huge political discourse was initiated and the article gives insights into its further development. In 2015 the Human Rights Council for the first time announced a special rapporteur on the right to privacy. However, the discourse is not only taking place on a political level, also civil society organizations advocate more stringent regulations and prosecutions against violations of the right to privacy. Moreover the importance of the technology sector becomes clear. Companies like Microsoft are increasingly taking responsibility to protect digital media against unjustified data misuse, surveillance, collection and storage. But whereas the IT sector is developing very quickly, legislative processes do ...
The Right to Privacy and Data Protection in the Information Age
Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2020
The article considers the legality of mass surveillance and protection of personal data in the context of the international human rights law and the right to respect for private life. Special attention is paid to the protection of data on the Internet, where the personal data of billions of people are stored. The author emphasizes that mass surveillance and technology that allows the storage and processing of the data of millions of people pose a serious threat to the right to privacy guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR of 1950. Few companies comply with the human rights principles in their operations by providing user data in response to requests from public services. In this regard, States must prove that any interference with the personal integrity of an individual is necessary and proportionate to address a particular security threat. Mandatory data storage, where telephone companies and Internet service providers are required to store metadata about their users’ communications ...
CrossCurrents, 2020
W ith the ever-increasing proliferation of technology that is "smart" enough to watch us and gather our data, it is easy to resign ourselves to diminishing spheres of privacy. We are told that our privacy is a small price to pay for the convenience and efficiencies that flow from automating tasks and tracking our data. Some of us have the luxury of shrugging off technical intrusions in our lives: we are not among those who are hyper-surveilled or who are at risk for mis-identification by law enforcement. Besides, we tell ourselves, the loss of privacy is inevitable. Other times, we may add that we have nothing to hide. If you have nothing to hide, then you have no reason to worry about the proliferation of surveillance and tracking. Concerns about privacy are linked to suspicions of wrongdoing: only the people who are up to no good need to hide their tracks. Ultimately, we may even suggest that there is something inauthentic or dishonest in wanting to safeguard our privacy. We should be the same in our private and in our public lives. Wanting to draw the curtains around our private lives suggests that we are somehow not truly our authentic selves while in the public eye. Again, what are you hiding? Much of the discussion and scholarship around privacy place the individual and their rights at the centre of discussion. There is considerable debate about how we should conceptualize privacy: is it about controlling access to ourselves, the management of personal information, or specific