Health Psychology Relation to Providing Psycho-Psychiatric Care to Persons with the Case of COVID – 19 (original) (raw)
Related papers
The importance of psychology in the COVID-19 pandemic
IJS - International Journal of Sciences, 2021
The concern for the mental health of the population intensifies during a serious social crisis. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic (COVID-19) can be described as one of these crises, which has been characterized as one of the biggest international public health problems in recent decades, having hit virtually the entire planet. An event like this causes psychological and social disorders that affect the coping capacity of the whole society, at various levels of intensity and propagation. Recently, different international organizations have expressed their concern about the urgency of mental health care in the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is worth mentioning the Brazilian Ministry of Health, which also emphasized the relevance of this issue in the country.
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people globally both physically and psychologically. The increased demands for mental health interventions provided by clinical psychologists, psychotherapists and mental health care professionals, as well as the rapid change in work setting (e.g., from face-to-face to video therapy) has proven challenging. The current study investigates European clinical psychologists and psychotherapists’ views on the changes and impact on mental health care that occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It further aims to explore individual and organizational processes that assist clinical psychologists’ and psychotherapists’ in their new working conditions, and understand their needs and priorities. Method Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) were invited (N = 698) to participate in a survey with closed and open questions covering their experiences during the first wave of the pandemic from Jun...
Psychological and psychotherapeutic challenges of COVID-19
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2023
Coronavirus is a deadly disease, classified on 30th January 2020, by the World Health Organization (WHO) that acknowledged the outburst of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), after several cases were reported from China's 34 regions. In 2020 the virus originated from the wholesale seafood market in Wuhan (China)spreading life all around the world. Quarantine, restraints, and economic closure can change a whole psychological environment in all the countries having coronavirus. affect Although this situation should give several opportunities for personal growth and family unity, disadvantages may compensate for these benefits affecting the psychological health of children and adolescents. But in this difficult time anxiety, and stress are common due to lake of relationships and also due to a reduction in other opportunities other risk includes parents' mental illness, domestic violence, and lack of treatment for the child during an illness. This was especially common in adolescents and children because they need special care thus causing disabilities, traumatic experiences, and mental health problems. With all these above-mentioned problems this was definitely a challenging time. In Italy where Covid-19 had severe effects on physical health but on mental health also and psychological issues are long-term and main challenges for our healthcare systems where mental health gain not as much important as other physical illnesses.
Psychological Implications of COVID-19 Pandemic - A Wide Spectrum of Manifestations
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has swept across the globe causing high morbidity and mortality and has brought in its wake, not only social and economic problems but also a myriad of psychological problems which if not addressed properly may not be as dangerous as the pandemic itself, but will contribute considerably to a significant loss of productivity in the society. Physical health and mental health, both are equally important and interdependent. "A sound mind in a sound body" is the need of the hour; but the present scenario is far from this. Unfortunately, with people suffering from physical illnesses as well as devastating mental sequelae of the pandemic, has resulted in social, financial, economic, and emotional impact. It is very important to identify and treat the mental health problem faced by the general population, quarantine people, health care professionals, at-risk-groups, and the victims of COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health problems can be in the form of depressive disorders, various anxiety disorders, stress related disorders, suicide and intentional self-harm, grief reaction, substance abuse (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, opioids) and domestic violence. We have only limited resources available to us during these difficult times. However, this should not dissuade us from ensuring optimal mental health and from trying to keep the struggling humanity "sane" during this pandemic. These resources must be used judiciously and appropriately, with necessary modifications (telephonic / audio-video consultations and counselling) in order to prepare a society which can move forward in the post pandemic era.
Clinical Psychological Science's Call To Action in the Time of COVID-19
2020
COVID-19 presents significant social, economic, and medical challenges. Because COVID-19 has already begun to precipitate huge increases in mental health problems, clinical psychological science must assert a leadership role in guiding a national response to this secondary crisis. In this paper, COVID-19 is conceptualized as a unique, compounding, multidimensional stressor that will create a vast need for intervention and necessitate new paradigms for mental health service delivery and training. Urgent challenge areas across developmental periods are discussed, followed by a review of psychological symptoms that likely will increase in prevalence and require innovative solutions in both science and practice. Implications for new research directions, clinical approaches, and policy issues are discussed to highlight the opportunities for clinical psychological science to emerge as an updated, contemporary field capable of addressing the burden of mental illness and distress in the wake of COVID-19 and beyond.
The Role of Psychologists in Healthcare During the COVID-19 Pandemic
European Journal of Psychology Open, 2021
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted individuals, communities, and whole populations. Experts across many different fields contributed their time and efforts in different ways to respond to the pandemic. Psychologists working in healthcare provided support and led many initiatives, both regionally and nationally. However, it is unknown how this has differed across Europe and its full range of activities and contributions. Aim: The current study is a survey of European member associations of EFPA, carried out to understand the current contributions and the impact those psychology contributions have had on the COVID-19 pandemic response, to share lessons learned, and to propose a roadmap for the future. Results: Overall, our study highlights how psychological expertise was integrated into many countries' policy/decision-making, action-planning, caregiving, and the promotion of health and well-being to health professionals and the general public. Even in places where psychologists were not directly integrated into governmental systems, they played an important role in responding to this pandemic by providing their services and empirical knowledge. Discussion: Many psychologists possess the skills and tools to adapt their practice to the digital provision of services and to provide a continuity of care during the pandemic. Research carried out by psychologists has contributed important and new knowledge on pandemic effects, consequences, and interventions; yet, more research financial support is needed. We make recommendations for augmenting psychologists' contributions in the future. In a global health crisis, where the main possible treatment is a preventive approach concentrated on sustainable behavior change, psychologists should be included every step of the waythey can make a difference.
Journal of Health Service Psychology, 2020
We conducted a survey of licensed psychologists at two weeks and again at six months after the declaration of a national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the results of the second survey conducted approximately six months after the crisis began. The rapid shift to telepsychological services seen in the first survey in the pandemic has solidified in the second survey. More providers reported delivering a larger percentage of services via telepsychology than early in the pandemic. The majority of respondents do not anticipate resuming in-person services until after a vaccine is made available, although a consistent minority reports ongoing in-person service provision. A majority reported their patients had appropriate access to internet and telepsychological service platforms, although one-fifth of respondents reported their patients had difficulty accessing such services. Early concerns about technological or regulatory problems involved in telepsychology are no longer evident. Most respondents indicated they will continue to use telepsychological services for the delivery of some of their psychological services after the pandemic ends. Forty-five percent knew of individuals who contracted the disease, 13% knew someone who died of the disease, and 2% reported contracted the disease themselves.
2020
COVID-19 presents significant social, economic, and medical challenges. Because COVID-19 has already begun to precipitate huge increases in mental health problems, clinical psychological science must assert a leadership role in guiding a national response to this secondary crisis. In this paper, COVID-19 is conceptualized as a unique, compounding, multi-dimensional stressor that will create a vast need for intervention and necessitate new paradigms for mental health service delivery and training. Urgent challenge areas across developmental periods are discussed, followed by a review of psychological symptoms that likely will increase in prevalence and require innovative solutions in both science and practice. Implications for new research directions, clinical approaches, and policy issues are discussed to highlight the opportunities for clinical psychological science to emerge as an updated, contemporary field capable of addressing the burden of mental illness and distress in the wa...