The Dictionary of the Village of Konyshche (Kovel District of Volyn Region) Dialect (original) (raw)
Related papers
Dialectisms of Roznoshenske and Velyki Troiany Villages Kirovohrad Region, Holovanivsk District
The Ethnology Notebooks, 2023
The article is dedicated to analysis of the regional language Roznoshenske and Velyki Troiany villages of the Kirovohrad region, Holovanivsk district. The study of the linguistic features of each region proves the relevance of local studies of dialects of certain villages and towns. Such work is needed for further in-depth studies, systematization of knowledge, and compilation of linguistic atlases for a certain area. So, the purpose of this work is to clarify the lexical features of the speech of Roznoshenske village and Velyki Troyany village of Golovaniv district of Kirovohrad region. The subject of the study is the lexical and morphological peculiarities of the functioning of dialectics, particularly, the dialect of the two above-mentioned villages is the object of the study. Materials for the study were collected during communication with the old residents of the villages, during visits to various ethnographic events in the above-mentioned villages. The relevance of the research is determined by the insufficient study of this issue, the need for a thorough analysis within a certain dialect at the regional level. The methodological basis of the research is a descriptive method with a combination of synchronic and diachronic aspects. Dialectic words of this land are fascinating because they combine some features of the steppes dialectic, within the Southeastern regional language, and Podolsky dialectic, within the southwestern dialect. The article traces the historical context of formation of the local dialect. Moreover, the thematic groups of dialectic words are highlighted: household vocabulary; flora and fauna; professions and craft; popular holidays, habits, rituals; phraseological dialectic words. Comparing the dialects of different villages of the studied region allows us to trace the various historical paths of certain lexemes, which can have completely different meanings depending on the area of use. Research is also focused on the phonetic and orthographic features of the regional language of the above-mentioned villages. Dialectic words of Kirovohrad region have own history of investigation, albeit, there are still a lot of topics for new studies. The analyzed material reveals to the public a little-known region of Ukraine, where, despite the futile efforts of the politic of russification, an authentic linguistic flavor has been preserved.
The dialect of the village of Aktanysh of the Republic of Tatarstan of the Russian Federation
World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies
The article describes the features of phonetics, morphology and vocabulary of the central sub-dialect of the Menzelinsky dialect of the middle dialect of the Tatar language using the example of the speech of residents of the village of Aktanysh of the Republic of Tatarstan. The most common phonetic properties, morphological features, examples from the vocabulary are described: individual words and stable expressions, examples of the so — called dialect codes are also given-what is a feature of the inhabitants of this area, those distinctive features in speech by which the speakers of this dialect are easily recognized. Thus, the peculiarity of the speech of the residents of the village of Aktanysh of the Republic of Tatarstan of the Russian Federation are: Russian Russian vowel [u] has a more backward formation than in the literary language and in some words corresponds to the sound [o]. (1) different variants of the sound [a]: [aw], [a], [a]; has a rounded and non-rounded variants ...
2020
The article analyzes the phonetic system of the Bulaeshty dialect of the Ukrainian language as used in the village of Bulaeshty in the Republic of Moldova. This had been established until the 15th century by the natives of Bukovyna in the Ukraine. A system of contemporary sound derivatives from a Proto-Slavic ancient phonetic system of consonants has been identified. The full or partial conservation of archaic phonetic forms has become fixed. The Bulaeshty dialect retains a number of relict forms, including phonetic archaisms which have long been lost in the Ukrainian literary language and are increasingly fixed in modern Ukrainian dialects. An record of consonant phonemes in the dialect has been compiled. There are 38 phonemes and according to the differential basis of the "place of creation" of the sound manifestations, traditionally they are classified into groups: 1) labials (/б/, /п/, /в/, /м/, /ф/); 2) front tongue (/д/, /д'/, /т/, /т'/, /з/, /з'/, /с/, /...
Between Russian and Belarussian: Dialects of Nevel district, Pskov Oblast
Slovene, 2018
The article describes the contemporary state of the dialects spoken in the Nevelsky district (Russia, Pskov Province), which is bordering Belarus, in comparison with the north-eastern Belarusian dialects located on the other side of the state border. When establishing the linguistic areas, it was assumed that on one side of this border the dialects would change following the Standard Russian language, while on the other side they would follow Belarusian. However, the real situation is much more complicated: on one hand, some dialectal features disappeared under the influence of the respective standard language; on the other hand, quite often features of both dialects do not correspond to either Standard Russian or Standard Belarusian, and there are existing “Belarusian” features on the territory of Russian dialects.
ДИАЛЕКТ СЕЛА СТАРОШВЕДСКОЕ: ОПЫТ СОСТАВЛЕНИЯ СЛОВАРЯ ИСЧЕЗАЮЩЕГО ЯЗЫКА (brist-nōḷ -diŋe-vāvär) 1 А. Е. МАНЬКОВ В данной работе мы продолжаем публикацию материалов для словаря современного диалекта села Старошведское, который является единственным живым скандинавским языком на территории бывшего СССР. Современное состояние этого диалекта не описано в лингвистической литературе, в связи с чем единственным источником фактического материала, приведённого в работе, являются устные интервью с носителями, записанные автором в ходе экспедиций в село в 2004-2013 гг. Общая цель работы -максимально полно представить материал, зафиксированный в интервью и, таким образом, попытаться показать реальное состояние диалектного словаря и морфологии. Словарные статьи состоят из следующих компонентов: указание на часть речи; тип словоизменения; перевод; словосочетания, предложения или небольшие тексты, иллюстрирующие словоупотребление (с указанием инициалов информанта). Во многих случаях приводятся парадигмы в виде таблиц, включающие в себя все фонетические и морфологические варианты, названные в интервью. Принципы публикации, список условных обозначений и сокращений, а также сведения об орфографии, разработанной нами для диалекта, приведены в предшествующей работе 2 .
Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2020
Mennonite Germans were among the many ethnic groups that inhabited the Crimean peninsula since the end of the 18th century until the 1940s. A special way of life, faith and language significantly distinguished them from other German immigrants. The dialect spoken by the Mennonites and called Plautdietsch (Plotditch) is a type of Low German, close to Low Prussian. During this period, two dialects were formed, which are still preserved in Mennonites communities in Siberia, in the Altai region, etc. – the dialects of Khortitsa and of Molotchna. The dialect contamination took place in new, mixed settlements, in the so-called daughter colonies. The major contribution towards studying the folklore and the language of the German colonies of the Southern regions of the USSR was made in 1920s by V. M. Zhirmunsky, a major Russian scholar, philologist, Germanist, folklorist, along with his students and assistants. The collection of the material and its linguistic description were stopped in th...
Gulevych V. What is «tatarshchyna» from the will of Volyn prince Volodymyr Vasylkovych (1288)?, 2024
The purpose of the article is to find out what the «tatarshchyna» was from the will of the Volyn prince Volodymyr Vasylkovych (1288). Novelty: «tatarshchyna» has not yet been the subject of a special study. In the sources of the 13th c., it is mentioned only once and never in the 14th c. Therefore, references to «tatarshchyna» and «ordynshchyna» in the sources of the 15th–16th c. were analyzed to determine its essence and content. Conclusions: «Tatarshchyna» was an irregular extraordinary and not clearly determined tax on princely needs related to Mongols.
2022
You can buy this book. Forwarding at your expense. All funds. received as a result of the sale, go to support the Ukrainian army. This monograph is the result of two years of research into the multi-layered settlement of Ratniv-II and sites located nearby. Given this, there is a need for generalized conclusions. The area of the settlement investigated as a result of excavations in 2014 and 2015 is 443.6 sq.m. The earliest stage in the settlement of the valley of the middle stream of the River Chornohuzka should be considered the beginning-middle of the 6th millennium BC. The tools on the blades, which belonged to the autochthonous population in the transit period from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic, should be associated with this time. The Neolithic era is represented by a single object –a household pit of the Linear Pottery culture (note phase), which dates back to the second half of the 6th millennium BC. The ceramic complex of object 17 finds a lot of analogies unique for this object in particular and for the culture of Linear Pottery culture of Volyn Heights, in general, is the conduct of the first paleobotanical analyses, based on the results of which radiocarbon dates were obtained. Copper age artefacts at the settlement are a small number, mostly collected during surveys on the modern surface and in isolated cases – in the cultural layer. The ceramics of three cultures were collected – Malice, Trypillia, and Globular Amphora cultures. The Early Bronze Age is represented by features 21, 36 and feature 59, excavated in 2015, with materials from the cultural layer and survey material. The first of them is a shallow storage pit with a slightly trapezoidal cross-section, the second remains unexplored in the main area. Feature 59 is a pit trapezoidal in cross-section, characteristic of the Mierzanowice culture. The Trzciniec-Komariv culture, or the Trzciniec-Komariv cultural circle, is represented by feature 22 of an elongated shape sunk into the loess, which includes an internal pit and traces of a hearth, which allows it to be interpreted as part of a dwelling. The Early Iron Age is represented by features 4, 18 and 37/61, as well as features 41, 53, 55-58, 62-63, which were explored in 2015. The first of them is a mysterious “moat”, the purpose of which can only be guessed, the second is a small depression near it. Many discoveries were made in the cultural layer and lifting material. The ceramic assemblage of the Lusatian culture is quite typical for the region, but the very presence of materials from the Mylohrad culture in the settlement along with the Lusatian ones is unusual for the River Styr basin. However, the materials of the latter are known in significant quantities in the Rivers Horyn and Ikva, where they occur alongside the materials of the Mohilian group. The Late Roman period is represented by quantitatively insignificant finds of Welbark culture materials in the cultural layer and lifting material. Separate finds of ceramics of the Przeworsk culture at the settlement are a synchronous admixture. Traces of a bone-cutting workshop and traces of spinning and weaving were found. Finds of this time were also discovered during the survey of the Bakai-I settlement. The Slavic occupation of the Middle Ages in the materials of Ratnov II is represented by the Prague and Raikovets cultures, as well as materials from the Old Russian period. The studied area provided materials that can be used to distinguish several periods of the features’ functioning.