ROSSELLÓ CALAFELL, G., Cartago y Roma. De enemigos íntimos a enemigos irreconciliables, La aventura de la historia 303, 2024, 46-52. (original) (raw)

ROSSELLÓ CALAFELL, G. "Présbeis autokrátores en el Mediterráneo antiguo: Cartago" , Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie II, Historia Antigua 37, 13-28, 2024.

Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie II, Historia Antigua, 2024

El presente estudio se centra en el análisis de casos en los que los embajadores cartagineses son descritos como autokrátores. Se propone una investigación detallada de estos ejemplos en comparación con los datos disponibles sobre esta cuestión en el mundo griego, donde este tema es más ampliamente reconocido, aunque no está exento de debate. A través de un examen minucioso del testimonio literario se extraerán conclusiones sobre esta figura en Cartago y su posible equivalencia con los roles análogos que hallamos en la órbita helena.

ROSSELLÓ CALAFELL, G., "Disceptatores Romani fuerunt. 'Compellence diplomacy' y arbitraje romano sobre el norte de África en el segundo período de entreguerras (201-149 a.C."), Habis 54, 79-108, 2023.

Habis, 54, 2023. , 2023

El presente trabajo analiza el desarrollo de la diplomacia entre Roma y los Estados norteafricanos desde el final de la Guerra de Aníbal hasta el inicio de la Tercera Guerra Púnica. Con este objetivo se examinarán los mecanismos utilizados por los romanos en relación con las demandas de mediación, entregas de tributos y de regalos, y conservación e intercambio de rehenes y prisioneros. Indagaremos, asimismo, sobre los objetivos verdaderos del modus operandi senatorial a propósito de su política exterior, y también sobre las características del arbitrio. This paper analyses the development of diplomacy between Rome and the North African states from the end of the Hannibal War to the beginning of the Third Punic War. To this end, it will examine the mechanisms used by the Romans in relation to mediation demands, tribute and gift deliveries, and the keeping and exchange of hostages and prisoners. We will also examine the underlying objectives of the senatorial modus operandi in foreign policy, as well as the characteristics of its arbitration.

ROSSELLÓ CALAFELL, G., "Romanos y cartagineses después de la batalla. Costumbres funerarias y rituales de la Segunda Guerra Púnica en las fuentes literarias", Hispania Antiqva XLVII , 1-31, 2023.

2023

El presente trabajo pretende realizar un análisis de las prácticas funerarias y rituales desarrolladas por cartagineses y romanos tras las batallas de la Guerra de Aníbal. Indagaremos, con este propósito, en el relato, a menudo estereotipado, de las fuentes literarias grecorromanas a propósito del tratamiento otorgado a los difuntos. También estudiaremos los mecanismos de obtención de spolia y sus diferentes usos. Nos preguntaremos, en definitiva, si podemos aislar ciertos patrones de comportamiento propios de época helenística y si la Segunda Guerra Púnica constituye un marco diferencial.

ROSSELLÓ CALAFELL, G., Cartago y la II Guerra Púnica, Septem Universitas, Universidad de Oviedo, 2006.

Cartago y la II Guerra Púnica, 2006

Cartago es probablemente una de las grandes desconocidas de la Historia Antigua Universal. Los recuerdos de su magnífica civilización no ocupan, y con seguridad no ocuparán el mismo número de páginas con las que Egipto, Roma o Grecia recargan los libros de historia, pero no por ello debemos considerarla menos relevante. De hecho, los cartagineses fueron los señores del Mediterráneo durante mucho tiempo, extendiendo sus influencias desde la lejana Tiro, en el actual Líbano, hasta las más recónditas regiones del actual Portugal, llegando a remontar incluso, mil años antes que los portugueses, las costas del África occidental. Cartago y la II Guerra Púnica relata y analiza los acontecimientos que condujeron a los púnicos a su predominio en el mundo antiguo, así como la principal causa de su declive, las Guerras Púnicas libradas y perdidas contra los romanos, herederos de su testimonio. El héroe de Cartago, el célebre Aníbal, y su guerra son por ello principales protagonistas de la obra porque: ¿qué sería de nuestro

2016.- No siempre enemigos. El viaje del infante don Carlos de Borbón y la expedición naval hispano-inglesa a Italia en 1731. Obradoiro de Historia Moderna, 25, 2016, pp. 1-33.

For the long and warlike reign of Felipe V (1700-1746) Spain and Great Britain mostly were fighting each other, but there was a short period (1729-1732) in which both nations had an interested friendship. Its main result for Felipe V was the British diplomatic support to overcome the resistance of the Austrian Emperor to send the Spanish Infante Don Carlos to Italy as heir to the duchies of Parma, Piacenza and Tuscany and the naval support for quartering in Tuscany 6.000 Spanish troops. Britain expanded the commercial advantages in America that it had obtained in Utrecht. The joint naval expedition to Italy marked the first political success of Philip’s revisionist policy, focused on recovering the Spanish presence in Italy. In this paper we treat the journey of Don Carlos to Italy and the joint naval expedition that accompanied him. Keywords: Don Carlos’s Journey to Italy, joint Spanish-British naval expedition 1731, Mediterranean revisionism.

(2024) El procurador criollo Alonso de Ovalle en Roma. Una "Histórica Relación" de guerra y paz, siglo XVII [with Josefina Domeyko]

Temas americanistas, n° 52 (2024): 24-45

In this article we will discuss a mediator –the criollo Jesuit procurator Alonso de Ovalle –and his movements between the Americas, Spain and Rome in the second half of the 17th century. We will link this mediator to an agent of knowledge and specific networks of knowledge. Thus, the case study we present allows us to examine how a book about Chile that was published in baroque Rome, An Historical Relation of the Kingdom of Chile, opens up possibilities for the procurator’s importance as a mediator and agent of circulation who was able to publicize and describe the vicissitudes of war and peace in a remote corner of the Spanish monarchy to Europe

[119] García-Dils 2021: Sergio García-Dils de la Vega. “Colonia Augusta Firma – Astigi”. En Trinidad Nogales Basarrate (ed.). Ciudades Romanas de Hispania. Cities of Roman Hispania. Roma-Bristol: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, pp. 213-226.

Ciudades Romanas de Hispania. Cities of Roman Hispania, 2021

The foundation of colonia Augusta Firma, seat of the conuentus Astigitanus, took place within the general process of colonisation and administrative reorganisation of the territory carried out by Augustus in Hispania in the last quarter of 1st century BC. The chosen site for the new colony was a Turdetan oppidum, Astigi, located at the precise point where the Genil river –then called Singilius– opened out into a wide valley, facilitating its fording and making it navigable. Epigraphic evidence shows that the colonial deductio would have taken place between 23 and 22 BC. Military veterans from the legions XXX or XVII Classica, IV Macedonica, VI Victrix and II Pansiana were settled here, being the new citizens ascribed to the tribus Papiria. The available archaeological evidence suggests that the new foundation would have covered an intramural area of 56 ha, although the outline of the city walls is still unclear, since they were completely dismantled after their destruction in January 913 by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān III. The inhabited area would have been even larger, since an extramural suburb, of about 2 ha, have been detected immediately outside the city, around the entrance of the uia Augusta from the west. The analysis of the location of the remains of uiae detected so far, allows to affirm that the orientation of the urban layout was 335.4° NW, following this pattern every single structure detected inside the city, both in public and in private spaces. As for the interior layout of the city, a basic module of 100 x 100 roman feet was used, which was applied intermittently in different sectors of the colony. All the streets located intra moenia present similar morphology, paved with irregular polygonal slabs of micritic limestone, some of them with pavements on both sides –porticoed or not–. Under most of these uiae there were sewers that drained the waters into the Genil River. Concerning the public water supply, it has recently been demonstrated that the city had a complete water supply network, with an underground aqueduct made with fistulae plumbeae, with water being distributed from the highest point of the colony, where there was a distribution device known as the arcula Terentiani. The city had extensive forensic spaces, covering a total surface of 35,900 m². The forum coloniae, with 18,048 m², was located in the southeast quadrant of the colonia, framed by the kardo 5 - maximus and the decumanus 8. The northern sector of the forum, defined as a témenos, was presided by a temple on a podium, dated back to the Augustan period, surrounded by a porticoed space –the porticus Munatianae–, which was enclosed inside a peribolos constructed in opus quadratum. Inside the témenos, a monumental pond was unearthed in the course of the archaeological excavations carried out in the Plaza de España, in the back of the remains of the podium of the temple, confirming the close link between water and official worship. On the eastern flank of the colonial forum, a public area has been defined, with 6526 m², and another one on the western flank, with 11,326 m², inside which has been registered the presence of a temple on a podium. As for the buildings for public spectacles, it has been possible to reconstruct the outline of the amphitheatre, located under the present bullring, with a major axis of 130 m and a minor one of 107 m. About the circus, there is a hypothesis concerning its plan, based on the analysis of several isolated structures, interpreted respectively as the remains of its meta prima, the spina and the podium of the western stands. Numerous private spaces have been documented in the city, particularly outstanding for their rich mosaic decoration. On this matter, the recent findings in the Plaza de Armas of the Alcazar Real of the city stand out, corresponding to monumental domus, which are currently in course of excavation. Finally, with regard to funerary spaces, in the current state of knowledge of the city, surprises the striking contrast between the remarkable wealth of archaeological evidence, and the total absence of monumental tombs. Considering the large number of archaeological interventions carried out in Écija, this absence should be seen more as a characteristic feature of the Roman settlement than as a research gap. On the other hand, we indeed have abundant and varied epigraphic evidence, marked by the presence of stelae with semicircular headstones indicating the pedatura, as well as a large number of tombs, both burial and cremation, located in large cemetery areas surrounding the city, even extending to the opposite bank of the Genil River.