Reflections on Plagiarism (original) (raw)
Related papers
PLAGIARISM IN THE SACRED SCIENCES: THREE IMPEDIMENTS TO INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
Philosophy and Theology, 2021
This article diagnoses the problem of plagiarism in academic books and articles in the disciplines of philosophy and theology. It identifies three impediments to institutional reform. They are: (1) a misplaced desire to preserve personal and institutional reputations; (2) a failure to recognize that attribution in academic writing admits of degrees; and (3) a disproportionate emphasis on the socalled "intention to plagiarize." A detailed case study provides an illustration of the need for institutional reform in the post-publication processes in the disciplines of philosophy and theology.
A CLEAR CASE OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT: DUPLICATE PUBLICATION AND PLAGIARISM
In light of uncontrolled evolution of journals, the standards of scientific communications have shown a gradual decline. In the name of open access publication, many journals and publishers have emerged throughout the world undermining the real motive of scholarly communications. With many publishers in fray to share the income generated from the article processing charges, the journals are in a hurry to accept most of the submissions without adequate peer evaluation. Copy and paste contents of previously published papers, creating duplicate publications with minor changes to the original one and plagiarism of papers without crediting the original authors (not citing the source) have been on the rise ever since, we saw increasing open access journal publishers. Pay per publication is now a common scenario in scientific publications
Tainted Texts: Plagiarism and Self-exploitation in Solar and Perlmann’s Silence
Tainted Texts: Plagiarism and Self-exploitation in Solar and Perlmann’s Silence
Abstract. This article analyses two novels on academic plagiarism, namely Solar by Ian McEwan and Perlmann's Silence by Pascal Mercier. Both novels describe experiences of academics in the second half of life who have lost contact with their areas of research and no longer seem able to live up to the daunting expectations associated with their international status, prominence and fame in the natural sciences (Solar) and in the humanities (Perlmann's Silence). The novels are analysed on three levels (knowledge, power and the Self) distinguished by Michel Foucault, pointing out how scientific plagiarism is connected with new forms of knowledge production and with power relationships in contemporary research. Most attention, however, will be given to the ethical dimension of the Self: the ways in which the academics involved fail to constitute themselves as responsible subjects, vis-à-vis the integrity challenges emerging in contemporary research practices. From a science ethics perspective, a more optimal scenario could have been available, but a close comparative reading reveals that both perpetrators face a far more devastating form of crisis, for which available guidelines fail to provide a fix. Both the challenge (loss of contact with their field of research) and the solution (plagiarism) are symptomatic of a structural problematic pervading the current research system, which I will thematise as self-exploitation, resulting in the eradication of a former, prolific Self, an experience that is articulated in Perlmann's Silence in psychoanalytic (Lacanian) terms, namely as an experience of 'splitting' (Spaltung). In both novels, plagiarism is enacted as a desperate (but faltering) attempt to achieve what Solar refers to as 'conflation': i.e. the effort to somehow restore an integrity (or wholeness) that already eroded long before the plagiarism was actually committed. Thus, science novels may contribute to our understanding of plagiarism and other instances of scientific misconduct.
A Report on Plagiarism by Professor Abd al-Fattah El-Awaisi of Dr. Abdallah Marouf Omar's Research
Plagiarism is a serious form of ethical misconduct in academia. Therefore, I find myself, Dr. Abdallah Marouf Omar, Assistant Professor of Islamic History at Istanbul 29 Mayis University in Turkey, with a Ph.D. in Islamic Jerusalem Studies from the University of Aberdeen in the UK (2009), obliged to reveal and discuss a case of plagiarism of which I have become aware. This misconduct was committed by Professor Abd al-Fattah El-Awaisi, FRHistS, who graduated with a Ph.D. in International Relations from the University of Exeter in 1986. Prof. El-Awaisi served as my Ph.D. thesis adviser from 2005 until 2007, when he left the UK for Yemen and ended his supervisory activities. This report discusses Professor El-Awaisi’s uncredited use of two fundamental ideas from my published research. He refused to cite me as the source of these ideas in the work that he published in 2013, 2019, and 2022. Despite my repeated attempts to contact him and convince him to refrain from claiming my ideas as his own and, instead, to cite me as the source of these ideas, he has refused to cite me.
Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer
Science and Engineering Ethics, 2013
The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question of possibly legitimate reasons to engage in this practice. It concludes that some of the animus frequently reserved for self-plagiarism may be the result of, among others, poor choice of a label, unwarranted generalizations as to its ill effects based on the specific experience (and goals) of particular disciplines, and widespread but not necessarily beneficial publishing practices.
2016
Whistler, the painter who saw it fit paint his elderly ‘mother’, was well known also for his wit. Once, appreciative of his particularly witty remark, (Lord) Byron remarked, “I wish I said that”. Whistler sardonically replied, “ You will, you will”. So much was written about plagiarism, honesty, values etc. in these columns that smacks of the “ol’ time religion…”. Self-appointed societies rushing at the windmills of scientific compulsions quixotically, committees after committees implicating and exonerating individuals in an endless pursuit of the zero sum game, leaving the public at a totally confused state amidst a welter of accusations and counteraccusations….all this to what end? Is all this self hypnosis based on presumptive action? Actually, is plagiarism all that bad? Who or what is hurt? Let he who has not sinned be the first to throw a stone!
Manifestations of Plagiarism and the Need for Plagiarism Check in Scholarly Writings
ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, , 2019
This paper describes the occurrence and manifestations of plagiarism in scholarly literature. It points out the reasons prompting to adopt plagiarism, the various types of it and the different unethical methods that the authors adopt while writing papers, theses etc. The authors list some nine software, with their place of origin, for automatically checking and estimating the exact similarity index for a given work. A few incidents involving plagiarism cases are also cited. check has been developed during the recent past. This paper outlines the various reasons for adopting plagiarism, the types and methods of occurrence and the commonly used software to check plagiarism.