Technology cost drivers for a potential transition to decentralized manufacturing (original) (raw)
2019, Additive Manufacturing
DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
Related papers
Costs of Decentralisation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
The South African Journal of Economics, 1990
- INDUSTRIALISATION POLICY, or any economic policy for that matter, carries both costs and benefits to an economy. Decentralisation policy in South Africa is no exception to this principle. This paper concentrates solely on the costs of decentralisation and no attempt is made to evaluate the benefits of the policy. The costs of decentralisation policy to the economy of South Africa can be separated into two parts. There are those costs which are reflected as items of expenditure in the Government budget and those for which the exchequer is not directly responsible but which nevertheless impinge on the economy. In this paper the first type will be termed 'direct costs' while the latter will be referred to as 'indirect costs'. The paper attempts to identify all the categories of costs and where possible provide estimates of their magnitudes and relative importance in the economy.
Managerial and Decision Economics, 1992
So here, at last, is The Handbook of Industrial Organization, long awaited and long-cited, the handbook for those with large hands. (The weight of Volume I alone was sufficient to dissuade me from carrying it between home and office.) Was it worth the wait? Is it something one would like to have close to hand? How does it compare to modern texts in the area? What does it say about the state of industrial economics? I think it would be better for me to defer answering these questions until I have dealt, in fair detail, with what each chapter has to offer.
2011
Regional Innovation Monitor 2.5 Assessment of regional innovation policies 30 2.5.1 Similarities 30 2.5.2 Differences 35 2.5.3 Relations between autonomy and types of implemented policies 37 2.5.4 Summary assessment of regional innovation policies 39 2.5.5 Perspectives of regional innovation policies 39 2.6 Analysis of governance, policies and performance links 41 2.6.1 Governance factors 41 2.6.2 Links between governance (factors) and patterns of innovation performance (factors) 42 2.6.3 Governance characteristics for the regional groups of innovation performance 42 2.6.4 Policy factors 44 2.6.5 Links between policy (factors) and innovation performance (factors) 45 2.6.6 Policy characteristics for the regional groups of innovation performance 45 2.6.7 Conclusions and perspectives in terms of policy challenges and policy options 49 2.6.8 Policy challenges and policy options 51 3. Strategic use of the Structural Funds for regional innovation policies 53 3.1 Contextual information 53 3.2 The assessment of the Structural Funds significance in terms of funding and relevance for strategy development 55 3.2.1 Regions with low significance of the SF in terms of funding (less than 10%), but high and medium relevance for strategy development 56 3.2.2 Regions with relatively low significance of the SF in terms of funding (11-24%) but high relevance 57 3.2.3 Regions with relatively high significance of the SF in terms of funding (25-49%) but both high and low relevance 57 3.2.4 Regions with very high significance of the SF in terms of funding (50-74% and above) but also very high and very low relevance 57 3.3 The strategic use of the Structural Funds 58 3.3.1 Current situation 61 3.3.2 Strategic desirable deployment of the Structural Funds 63 4. Conclusions and perspectives 73 4.1 Governance 73 4.2 Policies 74 4.3 Links between governance, policies and innovation patterns 74 4.4 Strategic use of the Structural Funds 75 Appendix A References 77 Appendix B Innovation performance factors and their composition 82 Regional Innovation Monitor iii Appendix C Typology of patterns of regional innovation performance and average scores of innovation performance 83 Appendix D A comparison of the typology on performance patterns and the Regional Innovation Scoreboard typology 85 Appendix E List of regions used for the development of regional innovation performance typology 88
Challenges for Europe under value chain restructuring: Contributions to policy debates
2009
Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu www.hiva.be Challenges for Europe under value chain restructuring Contributions to policy debates Pamela Meil (ed.) (ISF) Funded under the Sixth Research Framework Programme of the European Union European Commission Copyright (2009) Work organisation and restructuring in the knowledge society WORKS project-Project number: CIT3-CT-2005-006193 http://www.worksproject.be Higher institute of labour studies (K.U.Leuven) Hoger instituut voor de arbeid (K.U.Leuven
Successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology: a cross sectional survey
International journal of computer applications in technology, 2003
The regional dynamics of energy innovation, in particular the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy in the EU, is discussed within the framework of neo-Schumpeterian theory. The EU's 4.2% average annual growth in renewable energy production in the last decade has been accompanied by diverging performances among the EU countries. Regional performances within a country also vary. The periphery regions seem to underperform, as is shown for five regions in Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Cases of innovation networks in five forerunning regions, in Austria, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands, suggest that the development of renewable energy emerges from social innovations aimed at regional development, and it is driven by those change agents that can pull together national and regional policy instruments for project implementation. Based on an assessment of a province in the Netherlands, it is concluded that this development leads to the socially beneficial scaling up of renewable energy, albeit requiring capital at low interest rates.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.