The Continuing Debate on Death Penalty: An Exposition of International, Malaysian and the Shari'Ah Perspective (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Discourse of Capital Punishment in the Islamic Law and Human Rights Law
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society
The death penalty for convicts is an age-old subject to a lot of criticism from various quarters. The implementation of the death penalty is considered inconsistent with the principles of human rights which are principles of international law where countries cannot refuse because of common alignments, namely the right to life. The punishment of m ati raises pros and cons in Indonesian society, some agree with this punishment because the death penalty intends to protect the public interest and not a few oppose it, they argue that the death penalty is contrary to human rights principles. This fact encourages the author to examine the implementation of the death penalty based on human rights and Islamic law, this is because the majority of Indonesians are adherents of the Islamic religion and also because the implementation of the death penalty is still carried out in Indonesia in certain crime cases. To examine this conflict, the author uses a normative juridical method with the conc...
The Call for Abolition of Death Penalty: Islamic Law versus International Human Rights Law
Journal: Advanced Science Letters. Vol. 23, Number 9. September 2017. ISSN: 1936- 6612 (Print): EISSN: 1936-7317 (Online) Publisher: American Scientific Publishers. California, U.S.A. , 2017
An old and ongoing dialogue between religion and international law which raises the question of whether both are foes or friends seems to have found a place in the global debate on the call for the abolition of death penalty. With respect to the debate, two opposing sides were identified. The first being the promoting secular bloc which is the Western-styled international human rights system, while the other is the opposing religious side which is the Islamic Law system. It is, thus, intriguing to ascertain whether the respective positions of the international human rights system; a secular law and that of the Islamic Law; a religious law on the abolition of death penalty are irreconcilable. This becomes particularly necessary since whenever any reference is made to the rejection of the call, the charge is usually and invariably directed against the religion of Islam. This paper, therefore, examines the various issues of divergence between the two opposing systems in order to have a proper grasp of the differing position as maintained by Islamic Law on the call for the abolition of death penalty and why it takes that side. Thus, the overall ideal position that should be objectively considered from the points of view of the two opposing sides whenever there is a dialogue on the matter is also put forth in the study.
Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
Jurnal Hukum Novelty
Introduction to The Problem: Life is the greatest gift human beings receive. Man can achieve any task with life, and without it, man can do nothing. Thus, attempts by the State to punish human beings with the death penalty for wrongdoing are reaping the pros and cons. It is clear the stance of Western human rights activists opposed to the death penalty. What is interesting is that, although Islamic law supports it, many educated Muslims have objected to the death penalty. Purpose/Objective Study: The purpose of this research is to analyze and respond to the arguments used by Indonesian Muslim human rights activists, especially those integrated into human rights organizations, which are anti-death penalty. It is hoped that these reviews and responses will contain more definite opinions that can provide enlightenment for all. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research used a descriptive, analytical approach. Therefore, it employed secondary data and normative methods combined to case and statute approach in studying, analyzing, and responding to the arguments of anti-death penalty human rights activists among Indonesian Muslims. Their cases are to be brought forward, investigated, and then returned one by one. Findings: The research found that the human rights ideology propagated by western human rights activists is influencing Indonesian Muslim activists. They have the same point that the death penalty degrades humanity and violates human rights. In the meantime, Islamic law defends the death penalty for providing justice to the victims and the wider community, and for preserving life.
Paradigm of Death Penalty (Comparative Study in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China)
Lampung Journal of International Law
The death penalty is one of old criminal type as the age of human life, and the most controversial crime in of all criminal systems, both in countries that adhere to the Common Law System and in countries that embrace Civil Law, Islamic Law and Socialist Law. There are two main thoughts about the death penalty, namely: first, those who want to keep it based on the force provisions, and second are those who wish to the abolition as a whole. Indonesia includes a country that still maintains capital punishment in a positive legal system. This paper aims to resolve problems of the death penalty concept concerning the controversy purpose of the death penalty and to analyze the regulations, procedures and philosophies regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China. This paper uses normative juridical research and the methods based on the doctrine and developed by the author. The approach used the legal approach, historical approach and comparative approach, then analyzed...
Human Rights and Islamic Law - Punishments and Death Penalties
Undoubtedly, the international human rights movements is one of numerous human advancements and achievements of the modern period that have challenged Muslims and the Islamic world. Almost too much has been said and written as to whether the classical tools of traditional islamic jurisprudence has sufficient potential to come to terms with contemporary human rights norms. When discussing the traditional islamic legal discourse on human rights and its relationship with modern legal philosophy, a perennial problem re- enters the field of discussion, that I characterise as non-complementary paradigms. Similar to the non-complementarity between Newtonian Physics and Quantum Mechanics (both using a different language to depict the world and working at a certain level), modern judicial interpretation and legal philosophy on the one side and traditional Islam on the other make use of different languages based on different underlying presumptions, propositions,underpinnings,principles,theoretical bases and ontological and epistemological frameworks. While taking this fact into consideration, I still believe a harmonisation between the two is possible. The paradox between strict universalism and cultural relativism - the former running the danger of imposing a western-centred notion of human rights that is often perceived by former colonies as a new form of cultural colonialism and the latter being susceptible for being abused and rationalised for obvious human rights violations and repressive policies - needs to be overcome by acknowledging cultural diversity and embracing an inclusive multicultural interpretation of human rights principles and a distribution of normative and interpretative authority among different cultures and civilisations. Islam, as one of the major civilisations of the modern world, can therefore as a matter of fact not be excluded from - even needs to be welcomed into - this process of interpretation, as is the case for all other cultures and civilisations world-wide. Contrary to the reformist approaches of thinkers such as Kadivar or Khaled Abou el Fadl, I advocate an approach that is more grounded in traditional jurisprudence. While I genuinely appreciate reformist works and sincerely believe that they inspire and offer new frameworks for heated theoretical discussion, I believe that any attempt to reconcile or harmonise Islamic Law with modern human rights norms will be in need of an Islamic jurisprudential legitimacy and textual support in order to be to be heard and acknowledged by traditional mainstream circles, and to be a stimulator for change and transformation instead of limiting its impact to the bookshelf. All tools available in fiqh that have the potential to overcome possible clashes should be utilised and exhausted. Utilising the the traditional doctrines and tools of maqasid and maslahah (the commonweal of the community or society) effectively on the side of Islamic Law and the tool of ‘margin of appreciation’ on the side of human rights will therefore help to establish a more harmonist approach towards the issue. I will try to demonstrate through a critical evaluation of different theoretical perspectives why I adopt this position. For this, I have selected two provisions of the ICCPR: Article 7 (Prohibition of torture or cruel, in- human or degrading treatment or punishment) and Article 18 (Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion). Due to the breathtaking amount of literature on these two particular rights, I will only highlight those contributions that to my assessment need to be contemplated on more intensely, instead of merely repeating what has already been said.
Death Penalty; A Pakistani Perspective
Death Penalty is not really an issue in Pakistan. Mostly because it’s an ideological state, Constitutionally having a religion which clearly provides for death penalty. In addition to this ideological check, there is also a Constitutional check. Constitution of Pakistan states that all laws need to confirm to Islam and Supreme Court of Pakistan says that among others, this part of Constitution constitutes the ‘Basic Structure’ of the Constitution which cannot be amended, even by adopting the procedure that Constitution itself provides for its amendment! After making a jurisprudential argument in favour of abolition of death penalty, this paper explores the ideological and Constitutional checks in Pakistan legal system locking the death penalty in the system. In the end, an argument is made that in addition to taking the political course, a legal path can be taken to abolish the death penalty in Pakistan, without violating the Constitutional check; legal fiction.
Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia
International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2020
The aim of the research was to investigate whether the applicable death penalty in the Criminal Laws of Republic of Indonesia violates the human rights or not. To achieve the objectives of the research, both legal research and social-legal research method were used. Then, the respondents of the research were the representative supreme courts, official commissions, law experts, religious leaders and non-governmental organization. Depth interview and document study were chosen as data sources of the research, then, interview guidelines, note-taking, and voice recorder were used to be the instruments of the research. Death penalty is not contradictory with human rights as stated in Presidential Regulation No 2 of 1964 discussing the death penalty in Indonesia is applicable for those who commit serious crimes, namely; murder, drug possession, terrorist, and corruption. It is also corresponding to International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 7 Verse (2) – (6), which is stated that death penalty must be performed in proper methodology without both imprisonment for years and mental suffering. Death penalty is legally stated in Indonesia law that it is not recognized as cruel action in which the death penalty have never been resulting both physical and psychological pain as well as stated in Covenant and Political Right.
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Islamic law provides a sense of justice including in the threat of sanctions for crimes committed, Islamic law places punishments commensurate with the crimes so as to create a sense of deterrent effect for perpetrators and society. Including the death penalty. This paper raises two issues that will be discussed, namely: How is the contribution of Islamic law in determining death penalty laws in Indonesia and how is the legal politics of death penalty provisions applicable in Indonesia based on Pancasila? The Normative Juridical Approach is used as the writing technique of this research. This study aims to conduct legal research using library materials, secondary data, and original data as additional data. From the discussion of this paper, it can be concluded that the existence of Islamic law, especially regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, has a very strong contribution to punishment in general in Indonesia. Because Islamic law, especially in the case of the death penalty, de...