Mibanco, Peru: Profitable Microfinance Outreach, with Lessons for Asia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Microfinance in Peru as Part of the Strategy of an International Investment Fund
International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2015
This paper arises from the idea that in the current conditions of the credit crunch, the Microcredit can be a solution for small businesses that find it increasingly difficult to obtain credit from the banking system and also an opportunity of investment for international investors which want invest in this sector. However, for realize it there must be a system of specialized microcredit institutions and a critical mass of financial need that justifies the action also of investors, including international. Hence the idea of this survey on microfinance in Peru where we analyze the system of Microcredit and estimate, among other things, the financial needs of the institutions of Microcredit.
Experiences of microfinance institutions serving very small to small enterprises in Latin America
Enterprise Development and Microfinance, 2014
The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. IFC encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly, and when the reproduction is for educational and non-commercial purposes, without a fee, subject to such attributions and notices as we may reasonably require. IFC does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content included in this work, or for the conclusions or judgments described herein, and accepts no responsibility or liability for any omissions or errors (including, without limitation, typographical errors and technical errors) in the content whatsoever or for reliance thereon. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The contents of this work are intended for general informational purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, securities, or investment advice, an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, or a solicitation of any type. IFC or its affiliates may have an investment in, provide other advice or services to, or otherwise have a financial interest in, certain of the companies and parties (including named herein). All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to IFC's Corporate Relations Department,
A commercial bank's microfinance program
World Bank Discussion Papers, 2002
Discussion Papers present results of country analysis or research that are circulated to encourage discussion and conmment within the development community. To present these results with the least possible delay, the typescript of this paper has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
The New Microfinance Handbook, 2013
Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 16 15 14 13 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank and external contributors. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.
Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean: How large is the market?
Publication of the Inter-American …, 2006
In recent years, microfinance has greatly expanded the outreach of the financial system to millions of households in Latin America and the Caribbean. This expansion has taken place through a diverse set of institutions-called microfinance institutions-that are reaching an increased number of low-income households. The success experienced by these institutions has caught the attention of traditional providers of financial services, such as commercial banks, which are now entering into this market. However, there is a fundamental question that has not yet been sufficiently explored: what is the magnitude of the microfinance market in Latin America and the Caribbean? This report aims to answer this question through the use of institutional as well as household survey data. Data shows that, around 2005, the number of microfinance borrowers was about six million, with most clients (65 percent) being reached by regulated financial institutions. When we use national household surveys, we find that 4.5 million borrowing households are connected with a microenterprise (probably microfinance clients), while an aggregate number of eight million has overall access to credit in the region. This report also offers a simple and practical framework to improve measurement of access, demand and use of financial services. Data from mid 2001 (17 countries) Regulated MFIs 60 901 936,936 962 Downscale (Banks & Financieras) a 21 343 365
Mind the Gap in Financial Inclusion! Microcredit Institutions fieldwork in Peru
Revista de Contabilidad
Financial inclusion remains a key political issue. Since microcredit first captured public attention, Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) have expanded rapidly all around the world. Although much economic and financial literature has highlighted the importance of microfinance as a factor of development, there is also an intense debate about its effectiveness as a development tool. This paper is a descriptive analysis of the microcredit state of the art contrasted with the fieldwork done in Peru. A qualitative research methodology was used; 29 in-depth face-to-face interviews with different microfinance agents: MFIs, NPOs, microfinance associations, and microfinance customers in Peru. Peru has been chosen because it has a dynamic and well-regulated microfinance sector with more than 70 entities specialized in microfinance. Though statistical generalization is not possible, interview data provided rich and contextual evidence, which is often missing from a quantitative research approach....
Microfinance Market Niches and Client Profiles in Bolivia
Computational Economics, 2001
This paper presents and interprets descriptive statistics generated from data obtained in a survey of clients of five microfinance organizations believed to be among the best in Bolivia. These lenders represent different combinations of organizational design, lending technology, and market area of operations. Two are regulated financial intermediaries and three are NGOs. Two operate in rural areas (PRODEM and Sartawi) and three operate in urban areas (BancoSol, FIE, and Caja Los Andes). Two offer individual loans and three grant loans through joint liability groups. The paper discusses household-enterprise profiles of a sample of 622 clients and identifies terms and conditions of loan contracts with these organizations to evaluate the depth and quality of their outreach. The interpretation seeks to establish connections between key characteristics of the clients and features of the lending technologies that lead to the matching of classes of borrowers with particular organizations and that influence the choice of market niches. Data on loan sizes suggest the existence of different but broadly overlapping market niches associated with three tiers of clients. The sharpest distinction is between urban and rural clients. The matching between clients and organizations also reflects a weak but positive correlation between levels of poverty and loan sizes. According to an index of basic needs fulfillment of their clients, these organizations can be ranked as: FIE and Caja Los Andes (first tier), BancoSol (second tier), and PRODEM and Sartawi (third tier). The same ranking is obtained when clients are ordered according to loan size, the ratio of loan size to the value of sales, and the value of monthly sales. The three tiers of clients are associated with different socioeconomic features of their household-enterprises: sex, education,household size, access to electricity, water supplies, and sewage facilities, employment-generating capacity of the enterprise, informality and separation of household and enterprise, occupations and the like. The development of lending technologies that do not rely on standard financial statements and collateralizable assets is a formidable innovation that explains the outreach and sustainability of these organizations. Differences in the guarantees required for loans dominate distinctions in lending technology. Trade-offs between loan size, interest rates, and guarantee requirements attract different subsets of the clientele. Joint liability seems to be appropriate for very poor people, but group borrowers eventually outgrow this relationship. Caja Los Andes and FIE have shown that it is possible to supply individual loans to poor people and be profitable. Most clients are satisfied with the services received. The lowest satisfaction concerns loan sizes and loan-size rationing may be widespread. At least in urban areas, increasing competition will force these organizations to improve their services and adjust loan sizes. All of these organizations are expanding the frontier of microfinance by developing lending technologies for a much poorer clientele than is reached by collateral-based lenders. This is a formidable achievement. 1 This paper presents results based on data collected in a survey of clients of five microfinance organizations in Bolivia in November-December of 1995. Funding for the survey was provided by the Mission in Bolivia of the Agency for International Development, under purchase order No. AID 511-0000-0-00-6005. This paper is part of a series of studies of five Bolivian microfinance organizations undertaken by the Rural Finance Program at The Ohio State University. See footnote 3 for a list of sponsors of the broader research project. 2 Gonzalez-Vega is Professor of Agricultural Economics and of Economics and Director of the Rural Finance Program, Meyer is Professor Emeritus of Agricultural Economics, and Navajas, Rodriguez-Meza, and Schreiner are Graduate Research Associates, all at The Ohio State University. Monje obtained his Ph.D. in Rural Sociology at Ohio State in 1995. The individuals and organizations that made possible this research project are too numerous to cite here, but the authors want to express their gratitude to Steve Smith, Kimberly A. Brown, and Gabriela Salazar de Santa Cruz at USAID/Bolivia, as well as Fernando Prado, Miguel Hoyos (FUNDAPRO), and numerous representatives of the five microfinance organizations studied, whose tireless collaboration made these efforts both fruitful and enjoyable. The authors are responsible for all errors of omission and interpretation.
Commercialization of Microfinance Perspectives from South and Southeast Asia
2004
The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. The Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Use of the term "country" does not imply any judgment by the authors or the Asian Development Bank as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity.
Microfinance and Economic Inequality in the Peruvian Highlands
Microfinance programs have increased across the globe to help reduce poverty through access to small-scale capital. The spread has often dovetailed with structural adjustment policies in an attempt to address the financial needs of those in the informal economy. While microfinance institutions grow wealthier, their ability to enhance the financial stability of borrowers is tenuous. Research on microfinance programs in the rural highlands of Peru illustrates how they can undermine the financial security of borrowers, increase economic inequality, and decrease food security. Research findings also suggest that microfinance programs are unable to address the needs of women in the informal sector and that it is necessary to evaluate the effects of microfinance programs beyond that of the individual borrower. (Microfinance, Peru, economic development, women, empowerment)
The Second Story: Wholesale Microfinance in Latin America
2003
Microfinance is a development success story. In Latin America, the IDB has been a supporter from the earliest days of the region's experiments with microcredit in nongovernmental organizations. Its most important contribution, however, has been to promote the development of private microfinance institutions that are regulated and supervised by the relevant authorities in their countries. This support has extended much-needed financial services -savings as well as credit-to hundreds of thousands of microenterprises, enabling them to consolidate and grow.