Fostering Quality in Continuing Education (original) (raw)
This paper presents the quality development initiative set out by Swissuni, the umbrella organisation of the continuing education centres of Swiss universities. It describes how continuing education networks can influence national policies with regard to quality, despite the fact that they may only formulate suggestions for government agencies and for their own members. Swissuni's strategy rests on two foundations: the anchoring of university continuing education within the Qualifications Framework of the Swiss Higher Education Area (NQF-EHEA) and the building of common quality guidelines for university continuing education programmes. This paper discusses the particularities of the Qualifications Framework and the basic principles of the quality model. At Swissuni's instigation 'continuing education at the university level' has been integrated into the National Qualifications Framework as a fourth level alongside Bachelor's, Master's and doctoral programmes. In so doing it was possible to concretise university continuing education in its content, anchor it in the university system and communicate it clearly at the international level. University continuing education is oriented towards university graduates (and generally, those with Master's degrees and professional experience) and is conceptually positioned at the interface between theory and practice, and between research and problem-solving. This positioning has engendered specific target competences, which in part differ greatly from the Dublin Descriptors of the other three levels. The relevant quality development criteria are based on the National Qualifications Framework and were formulated in cooperation with the Center of Accreditation and Quality Assurance of the Swiss Universities (OAQ). Here principles of flexibility, impact orientation, multidimensionality, client feedback, stakeholder involvement and constant quality improvement are accorded more weight than in the guidelines for Bachelor's and Master's degree programmes. Swissuni is convinced that the quality of continuing education is only revealed in its effects in the workplace and on the career and personal development of the participant, with the caveat that this quality may only be steered through goal-setting, resources and processes. This requires rapid feedback mechanisms, periodic context and impact analyses, and the inclusion of the relevant stakeholders in planning, implementation and evaluation.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
University Continuing Education in the 21st Century: Aspects and Perspectives
Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 2013
The two Forum pieces in this issue both address the role of our continuing education units, but from very different perspectives. The piece by Ken Coates, titled "Reinventing Universities: Continuing Education and the Challenge of the 21 st Century," is a very wide-angle view, as seen by an outsider, an individual who has had a great deal of experience as an administrator in a number of Canadian universities but not in continuing education units. This piece is based loosely on the keynote address that Dr. Coates delivered at the CAUCE conference held in Saskatoon in May 2012. The author begins by discussing several macro-trends that are affecting higher education generally. He then discusses ways in which continuing education units can work within this changing environment to benefit both their parent institutions and society in general. In sharp contrast to this macro-level, outside-in look toward the future of continuing education in our institutions, the other Forum piece in this issue is a micro-level, insider analysis of where our units are now and where they might go from here. Titled "What's on the Minds of CAUCE Members? CAUCE Institutional Members' Survey 2012," it was written by Lorraine Carter and Behdin Nowrouzi on the basis of a survey of CAUCE institutional members. The 2012 survey is essentially the same as the survey carried out three years earlier and written up by Lorraine Carter and Tracey Taylor-O'Reilly as "CAUCE Institutional Members' Survey: A Snapshot" in Volume 35, No. 2, of this journal. The goal of both surveys was to find out what the members of CAUCE were interested in and concerned about and to adjust accordingly the programs and services offered by CAUCE. In reporting the 2012 survey, Carter and Nowrouzi frequently comment on how the responses in the recent survey differ from or are similar to those reported in the 2009 survey. One interesting finding of the 2012 survey, quite in line with what Coates says about likely future trends, is that a substantial majority (81.1%) of respondents thought continuing education would become more important within their universities over the next three years, as compared to 68.8% who expressed this opinion in 2009. There are many other tidbits of thought-provoking information in this report-it will be well worth your time to look it over carefully. The two articles in this issue both address, though in very different ways, the effects of age in the workforce and in continuing education. Erika Smith, in "Are Adult Educators and Learners 'Digital Immigrants'? Examining the Evidence and Impacts for Continuing Education,"
Formation of a Continuing Education System in Modern Conditions
Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2020
The purpose of the article is to develop proposals for the formation of a continuing education system. The methodological basis of the study included the following general scientific methods: analysis and synthesis in the analysis of existing theoretical and methodological approaches and provisions, as well as scientific developments on the assessment of the continuing education system; structural and logical in the systematization of factors affecting the state of continuing education; factor analysis in determining the impact of factors on the level of development of continuing education. It has been established that continuing education is designed to ensure the harmonious development of each individual, individualize learning, and form a conscious need to improve the level of knowledge in each person. It has been established that continuing education in its modern state has several characteristics, the main of which are the widespread introduction of educational technologies based on information and communication technologies, openness and accessibility of education, guarantee of high-quality training while focusing on mass education, and effective support for students. It has been revealed that continuing education focuses on advancing the development of society, professional career, personal skills, and other spheres of social practice, which implies continuity and multivariance of general and professional education.
Quality in Adult Continuing Education: Hong Kong Perspectives
In Hong Kong, and throughout the world, continuing education (CE) is growing fast and changing fast. In 1996 for the first time a major official report stressed the importance of CE in Hong Kong. The University Grants Committeeís comments were trenchant:
Individual Benefits of Continuing Higher Education. The Case of a Swiss Business School
Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 2023
This contribution examines individual benefits of continuing higher education courses provided by a business school. Lifelong learning is important when it comes to keeping up with changing professional requirements and conditions. Adult education and training courses in the form of continuing higher education offer an organized and systematic possibility to further develop oneself. However, empirical evidence on the benefits to graduates is sparse. This article aims to expand the state of knowledge through a Swiss case. Using univariate and multivariate analyses of survey data ( n = 1615), benefits contributing to the satisfaction with practice oriented, non-formal education for working professionals are examined. The analyses focus on satisfaction with one of three types of continuing education programs as a measure for the overall benefit to the graduates. The findings provide important indications for the design of continuing education programs in the context of professional hig...
Continuing Professional Education: Enduring Challenges, New Developments, and Future Vistas
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2016
The purpose of this volume is to initiate a critical analysis and discussion of the current "state of the field" thinking about continuing professional education (CPE). Much like Mott and Daley' s (2000) work, the intent is to revisit and update practitioners on CPE trends, issues, and practices across a variety of contexts and to highlight new thinking and developments in practice to assist them in setting new directions for CPE. In this chapter, I review the terrain covered in each chapter, and I offer some general insights for the future. As the chapters in this volume reveal, history matters. Debates about CPE, what it is for, and how it might be conceptualized, have been ongoing for 50 years and have been continued by the contributors to this issue. A process of taking stock reveals that almost 40 years after the publication of Continuous Learning in the Professions (Houle, 1980), many of the challenges identified by Houle and also by Cervero (2000) and Mott and Daley (2000) persist today as focal points for change. Despite Houle' s caution not to focus on increasing the number of formal educational offerings, as well as Daley and Mott' s (2000) vision of CPE providers as facilitators of learning, and the significant consensus on how professionals learn, most professional development and CPE practices continue to focus on delivering content rather than on enhancing learning. A unifying picture of effective CPE across professional groups remains elusive, and continuing education serves increasingly to regulate practice and to allow for the relicensure of professionals. We have not come as far as Houle thought we might. Clearly, the persistent issue identified by Cervero in 2000-multiple stakeholders with diverse competing professional, social, institutional, and educational agendas-remains the key stumbling block. The critical questions he raised then-Continuing education for what? (the struggle between updating professionals' knowledge versus improving practice), Who benefits from
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.