Madness in the Making: Psychosocial Disability and Theater (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mental Illness Through Popular Theatre: Performing (In)Sanely
This chapter explores the transgressive and liberatory learning and creativity of popular theatre when the freedom and power to imagine and raise awareness is placed in the interacting bodymind relationships of a group living with multiple psychiatric diagnoses.
The paper describes an approach to theatre as an educational intervention in society linking the artist, the psychiatrist, and social groups with an interest in mental illness. An exploration of narratives and diagnostic criteria from psychiatric case studies led to the creation of two dramatic monologues focusing on awareness and impact of bipolar disorder on intimate personal relationships, particularly on the evolving transactional roles between the partner/caregiver and partner/patient. The paper argues that devised performance based on themes and characters that emerge from within the field of psychiatry may be used to address perceptions of mental illness and stigma for general community audiences. It concludes that psychiatrically informed material can be successfully translated into original dramatic performances to address current educational and social issues and raise social awareness in thought-provoking and stimulating ways to members of the public. Keywords: Devised Theatre, Mental Illness, Stigma
The paper describes an approach to theatre as an educational intervention in society linking the artist, the psychiatrist, and social groups with an interest in mental illness. An exploration of narratives and diagnostic criteria from psychiatric case studies led to the creation of two dramatic monologues focusing on awareness and impact of bipolar disorder on intimate personal relationships, particularly on the evolving transactional roles between the partner/caregiver and partner/patient. The paper argues that devised performance based on themes and characters that emerge from within the field of psychiatry may be used to address perceptions of mental illness and stigma for general community audiences. It concludes that psychiatrically informed material can be successfully translated into original dramatic performances to address current educational and social issues and raise social awareness in thought-provoking and stimulating ways to members of the public.
Disability and the American Stage Musical
The Routledge Companion to Literature and Disability, 2020
This chapter offers a brief history detailing the emergence of the able-bodied triple-threat performer and discuss two primary modes of disability representation in musical theatre: narrative prosthesis, or a dependency on metaphors of disability, and disabilities woven into the fabric of a character and plot that compel physical performance onstage – what the author calling diegetic disabilities. It intends to open conversations regarding the organization of musical theatre around the able body and begin to answer how and why disability is a significant concern of the American stage musical. The most common example of disability in musical theatre is a rhetorical invocation in musicals in which there are otherwise no disabled characters at all. We can easily find examples of ableist language in everyday speech: a movie may be “lame,” a highway can be “crippled” by a snowstorm, your “psycho” neighbor or co-worker, and many more besides.
The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 2023
How does it feel to lack something that everyone else has? How does it feel not being able to do something that everyone else can do? This difference, felt by the disabled or differently-abled is more likely the desperation out of discrimination. The concept of equality here often equates to preferences, but preferences are not solutions; they are merely support mechanisms in social dynamics. The labelling of the disabled as unique or special is not optimistic in the truest sense, but shaping their minds to feel so is. The primary support system for one is the family; however, when circumstances become extreme and unbearable, they can shatter familial stability, disintegrating it into a dysfunctional entity. This research paper is a detailed study of the two American plays, The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams and Long Day's Journey Into Night by Eugene O'Neill. It examines and interprets the intersection between disability and dysfunction and their role in the familial crisis in light of societal norms and expectations. Parallel to the literary world, the paper also discusses the perspective of viewing disability as art and conceptualizing addiction as a disability in the real world from a practical and policy-oriented perspective.
Playing Deaf and Dumb: Disability and the Contemporary Theatre
Discourses on Nations and Identities
This paper explores how the "otherness" of disability continues to occupy the periphery of theatre internationally, due in part to the movement of the "otherness" of race to the centre. This paper questions why, in an age of gender and race requirements in casting, similar requirements are markedly absent or impossible with regard to disability. Even in dramas that feature disabled characters, the dramatic structure itself can make the participation of a disabled actor impossible. For example, act 1 of Bruce Norris's Tony Awardand Pulitzer Prize-winning drama Clybourne Park (2012) features a deaf young woman. The requirements of staging seem to offer no barriers to the participation of a deaf actor until the second act, when it becomes apparent that the drama requires that the same actor double in a non-deaf role. As the actor appears in the second role, the audience can indulge in a moment of aesthetic distancing: "ah, she was playing deaf." The disabled body is displaced from the centre after having served as the narrative crutch to support the drama's argument about race in America. In the particular case of Clybourne Park, I will demonstrate that the drama's fundamental message relies on the presence of an able-bodied actor to double as disabled, in order to embody a vision of a future in which racism, like deafness, can be "cured."
"Antic Dispositions?": The Representation of Madness in Modern British Theatre
This thesis examines how mental illness has been represented in British theatre from c. 1960 to the present day. It is particularly concerned with the roles played by space and embodiment in these representations, and what emerges as bodies interact in space. It adopts a mixed methodology, drawing on theoretical models from both continental philosophy and contemporary cognitive and neuroscientific research, in order to address these questions from the broadest possible range of perspectives. The first part of the thesis draws on the work of Michel Foucault and Henri Lefebvre to explore the role of institutional space, and in particular its gendered implications, in staging madness. The second part introduces approaches to the body drawn from the cognitive turn in theatre and performance studies. These are connected to the approaches of the first section through phenomenology’s concern with lived experience. Dan Zahavi and Shaun Gallagher’s work on ‘the phenomenological mind’ provides important context here. In addition, Emmanuel Levinas’s critique of ontology offers a solid basis from which to think about how to act ethically as both a producer of, and an audience member for, representations of mental illness. Through these explorations, this thesis suggests a model of madness, not as something to be bracketed as ‘other’ and belonging to a deviant individual, but as emerging between bodies in space – there is no madness outside of social, spatial and embodied contexts. This in turn suggests a new approach to understanding the role theatre can play in addressing the lived experience of mental illness. While many productions currently attempt, unilaterally, to reduce the ‘stigma’ of mental illness, this thesis suggests that, in fact, discrimination against people experiencing mental illness is more likely to be reduced through the interaction between an ethically minded production and an ethical spectator. Such a model does not claim to be able to reduce the experience of madness to a totalising concept which can be communicated through theatre, but rather insists that it is only through an embodied, empathic interaction that a true concern for the (‘mad’ or ‘sane’) Other can emerge.
Come Together: Discomfort and Longing in Jérôme Bel’s Disabled Theater
This essay analyzes Jérôme Bel and Theater HORA’s Disabled Theater through a critical lens of disability by closely reading several of its Berlin and New York performances, drawing upon interviews with audience members and actors, and comparing the production with Bel’s earlier work, The Show Must Go On. Although Disabled Theater has been celebrated for aesthetic innovation and a bold, so-called politically incorrect embrace of disability, I argue that its aesthetic and affective work is coupled with and dependent upon a reductive approach to disability. The production achieves its force and audience interest by tacitly targeting the uncomfortable feelings many of us have about disability and then offering a fallacious sense of emancipation from these disabling perceptions and emotions. There is, however, an exception to this dynamic and outcome. Refusing to abide by the production’s otherwise normate perspective and expectations, Peter Keller’s individual performances offer an example of disability’s transgressive power and beauty onstage.