Standardization as an Imperial Practice of Byzantine Soft Power (original) (raw)
Related papers
E. FLAIG (ed.), Genesis und Dynamiken der Mehrheitsentscheidung (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs. Kolloquien 85), Munich 2013, 2013
Hē tōn pleionōn psēphos. Der Mehrheitsbeschluss in der Synode von Konstantinopel in spätbyzantinischer Zeit – Normen, Strukturen, Prozesse, in: E. Flaig (ed.), Genesis und Dynamiken der Mehrheitsentscheidung (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs. Kolloquien 85), Munich 2013, pp. 203-227.
The thesis analyses the development of the Late Roman and Early Byzantine administration of those territories which are called "Armenian" in the sources of the time from the 4th century until the development of the thema Armeniakon and the establishment of Arab supremacy in Greater Armenia (around 700 CE). Latin, Greek and Armenian source (in original language) as well as Arab sources (in translation) are taken into consideration. Highlighted is also the relationship between Roman administrative institution and the Armenian aristocracy and its traditional framework of power and influence.
Takashi Fujii, Imperial Cult and Imperial Representation in Roman Cyprus. 2013
Klio
Cʼest avec Alain Gowing ("Afterword", 319-332) que sʼachève le volume. Rassemblant à chaque fois 2 ou 3 articles en fonction de leurs points communs, il offre une synthèse thématique et / ou analytique des grandes idées soulevées par les contributeurs à travers 7 titres / questions: "What ‚Past'?" (321), "The Literary Past. Intertextuality, Allusion, Memory" (322), "The ‚Historical' Past" (323), "The Past and Memory of Place" (326), "The past through exemplarity" (327), "The past in the future" (328), "Reversing the Explanation" (329).