Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of English and Scottish University Governing Bodies in the UK (original) (raw)
Related papers
Understanding the origins, evolution and state of play in UK university governance
Understanding the process of evolution of university governance types, and the links between them, is important for appreciating current debates over university accountability and management. Shattock (2006) observed that there are four models of university governance in the United Kingdom: Oxbridge, ancient Scottish, civic university and higher education corporation. These four types, or species, of university governance structures came to exist after centuries of evolution. Each type grew out of earlier models and yet all of these models continue to operate in the twenty-first century.
Tertiary Education and Management, 2000
The changing relationship betweeninstitutional governance and management in the unitedkingdom arising from the second report of thecommittee on standards in public life, the UnitedKingdom National Committee of Inquiry into HigherEducation, and from significant increased governmentexpenditure on higher education is examined. Theframework of accountability within which highereducation institutions operate is related to thesereports. The Scottish Higher Education FundingCouncil's (SHEFC) perspective of the role of thegoverning body is examined and contrasted with bargh,scott and smith's research on governing bodies. BothSHEFC's perspective and Bargh et al.'s researchare also contrasted with, and related to, a number ofNational Audit Office (NAO) reports and also toProfessor sizer's investigation and the nao reportinto allegations of misconduct at glasgow caledonianuniversity (1998). Finally, the paper drawsconclusions on the changing relationship betweengoverning bodies and managements, on the requirementon governing bodies to demonstrate that they areappropriately constituted and operate effectively ascorporate bodies, and on how these are reflected inthe SHEFC code of good practice and good practicebenchmarks.
The Composition of Governing Bodies: a Case Study of a College in England
The aim of this case study is to investigate the perceptions of the governing body (GB) members of an English college in terms of how they view the composition of FE governance bodies (GBs) in England. It will also attempt to explore various membership types and their roles within the concerned college GB. The rationale for this mini-research project is that college governing bodies make strategic decisions affecting the long-term planning of college future. However, UK FE governance is a subject that is in need of much research (Gleeson, Abbott, & Hill, 2010). The study will focus on one college, X, in England. It has a student population of over 7000 students and was judged as ‘satisfactory’ by OfSted in the most recent inspection. The area where the college is located is an area of significant deprivation with higher than average unemployment rates. The study found that the Governors regarded the experiences brought into the GB by the following governors very highly: external governors; those who have been involved in FE Education; teaching/management) and student governors. A considerable number of governors may play a supportive role, at least in some situations, of SMT’s ideas; value a variety of expertise including FE Education; be keen to respond to the local community’s needs; be very active in approving college’s accounts and believe that profit-making is an important role of the college. Many governors regarded governmental interference; lack of time and other governors’ attitude as barriers to their roles in the GB.
Researching governance in higher education: trends, issues and challenges
Huisman, J. & F. Huang (2022). Researching governance in higher education: trends, issues and challenges, In J. Huisman & M. van der Wende (eds), A research agenda for global higher education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 43-59., 2022
Our point of departure is to conceive of governance as a set of arrangements of authoritative direction and coordination of and control over a higher edu cation system. The term 'governance' is used, in line with what many analysts labelled as a shift from government to governance (van Kersbergen & van Waarden, 2004). This is a multi-faceted development in many public and semi-public sectors and encompasses a change in the composition of actors involved in this set of arrangements as well as a change in the mechanisms and styles and level of coordination and control. The authors refer for instance, to the emergence of supra-national and multi-level arrangements to deal with problems that cannot be solely tackled by nation States, to self-governance in case actors within a certain domain can actually do without governments, to the increasing importance of markets and competition to regulate public sectors, to the transfer of governance practices from the private sector to public sectors (New Public Management), and to network governance in which actors collectively and in consensus strive for governance Solutions.
Whither Good Governance? Beyond the Current Malaise in Higher Education
This paper outlines a model for governance based upon mutual respect among organizational stakeholders, which it calls rational and reasonable governance. The first section describes some of the inherent or unmet needs in many governance structures, sources of irrational or unreasonable governance, or more simply anti-governance. The second section describes several sources of rationality and reasonableness for the self-understanding of higher educational professionals. These sources of better governance address the inherent needs. The third section sketches a model of governance that reduces the sources of anti-governance and opens up synergies for academic professionals who choose to collaborate through revisioning and renewing their interactions. The paper concludes with a comment on the relationship between a rational and reasonable model of governance and institutional trust. professionals work out their careers for the benefit of students, other university stakeholders, and broader communities. Higher education professionals need governance in order successfully to function as members of complex organizations dedicated to the provision of learning, marketable skills, and general education. They must demonstrate and educate students about the importance of good government and the interaction of voice, responsibility, action for change, and community.
Five Case Studies of Governance in Tertiary Education
Most studies of governance in tertiary education take as their points of reference colleges and universities, with few examining governance in organizations that deliver various other forms of tertiary education. These organizations often have governing boards, but the boards are not necessarily downsized versions of their college and university counterparts. Although some studies classify governing boards into different types, few offer a clear definition of such boards or explain how they actually function in institutional contexts other than colleges and universities. This study examines gov-ernance in five small, public, not-for-profit tertiary institutions, each with a board, to determine what the boards look like, how they perform, what is expected of them, and how they are similar to or different from other types of boards in colleges and universities. Résumé Comme il existe très peu d'études sur la gouvernance dans les organisations offrant d'autres formes d'enseignement supérieur, la plupart des études sur le sujet prennent comme référence l e s collèges et les universités. Ces organisations disposent souvent de conseils d'administration, mais ceux-ci ne sont pas nécessairement une version édulcorée des conseils collégiaux et universitaires. Des études classent les conseils d'administration selon différents types, mais peu en offrent une définition claire ni n'expliquent leur véritable fonctionnement dans un contexte institutionnel autre que dans les collèges et les universités. Cette étude se penche sur la gouvernance de cinq petits établissements d'enseignement supérieur publics à but non lucratif ayant chacun un conseil d'administration. Le but est de déterminer ce en quoi ils consistent, leur rendement, quelles attentes on entretient à leur sujet et en quoi ils sont semblables ou différents des autres types de conseils collégiaux et universitaires.
A Renewed University Governance
International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 2013
ing new pressures and demands on higher education systems and deeply influencing the context in which universities operate. The paper attempts to investigate governance issues and the need for new strategic paths emerging as a result of changed scenarios. Specifically, the greater number of stakeholders involved in academic activities requires universities to take into account a variety of social, economic and cultural factors when making strategic decisions. Adjustments in board composition through appointing non-academic members are signals of such trends. Moving from this consideration and relying on data on the governance structures of Italian universities, the paper discusses challenges for academic institutions in terms of change in their strategic management and governance structures as well as the likely directions such change is taking.
governance during the last decade, identifying points of continuity in the policy and political environment in the United Kingdom as well as points of difference. External drivers are discussed as part of the increasingly dynamic and volatile operating conditions for higher education. Institutions' internal governance arrangements are presented within a framework drawn from Clarke's studies of entrepreneurial universities. The final section of the article argues for a re-interpretation and strengthening of collegial forms of governance, using models and examples drawn from innovative private sector companies that can indicate useful directions for higher education institutions so that they are better fitted to meet 21st century challenges. While the analysis is focused on the UK, the lessons are more widely applicable. bs_bs_banner Higher Education Quarterly, 0951-5224
Governance Shifts in Higher Education: a cross-national comparison
European Educational Research Journal, 2006
The article aims to interpret and compare recent governance shifts in higher education across several countries, both at the central government level and at the institutional or 'corporate' level. In order to do that it reviews the most significant literature about alternative theoretical models of governance in higher education and uses these models to interpret changing governance across several nations. It suggests the existence of a general tendency towards a 'new managerialism' governance model in Western Europe. In order to explain this tendency special attention is paid to countries in the forefront of governance innovation. The traditional continental European model is a term of comparison.