Challenges and Prospects of Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Cleaner Production
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreed by Heads of Government in 2015 represent a major multilateral effort to shift the world towards more sustainable and resilient pathways, also taking into account the needs of developing countries. The SDG Agenda calls for a global partnership-at all levels-between all countries and stakeholders who need to work together to achieve the goals and targets, including a broad spectrum of actors such as multinational businesses, local governments, regional and international bodies, and civil society organizations. The purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of the literature and develop a novel framework in order to tackle the barriers and challenges to operationalize and monitor the implementation of the SDGs. To achieve this, this paper reports on a state-of-the-art review of the SDGs, with a particular emphasis on their applications and linkages with sustainability science and aspects of knowledge management. This paper also reviews the rationale and aims of the Sustainable Development Goals, outlines some of the problems and barriers related to their implementation, and presents some areas which deserve future attention. Ultimately, this paper seeks to uncover the various gaps and suggests some means via which some of challenges seen in the accomplishment of the 17 SDGs may be faced.
This article analyses the emerging scope of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as the successor development instrument to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which are scheduled to end on 31 December 2015. The top priorities of the stakeholders involved in the shaping and negotiation process include poverty eradication, water sanitation, energy, economic growth, green growth, governance and employment. Current trends appear to favour a progression of the shaping and negotiation process which goes beyond the established MDG goals. Keywords: Millennium Development Goals; Sustainable Development Goals; multi-stakeholders; United Nations processes
Sustainable Development Goals: Concept and Challenges of Global Development Goal Setting
Handbook of Global Health
The power dynamics in the global development agenda setting are known. Traditionally, debates are pitched on platforms glorifying how the developed Global North arm twists the developing Global South to comply and/or conform to specific policy positions. Through actor-network theory, document analysis, and critical discourse analysis, the chapter traces global development agenda setting mainly from the Rio+20 Summit whose outcome document is codenamed "The Future We Want." From Rio+20 emerged a global development road map leading to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (AfSD) and its 17 inseparable sustainable development goals (SDGs). A 3-year negotiation period was established, terminating in the new global sustainable development agenda that succeeded the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2016. Although the SDGs have received unanimous endorsement by global governments, their development was not as straightforward as many may think. With the rallying banner "Let no one be left behind," the global goals indicator
A Review Study On sustainable Development Goals: UN 2030 Agenda
Our Heritage, 2020
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, got by each United Nations Member States in 2015, gave a common framework to amicability and flourishing for people and the planet, by then and into what's to come. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are a basic call for action by all countries-made and making-in an overall association. This study describes the understanding of all 17 sustainable development goals in detail and observed that fulfillment desperation and various hardships must go inseparable with philosophies that improve prosperity and guidance, decline irregularity, and push financial advancement-all while taking care of natural change and endeavoring to spare our oceans and boondocks. To make the 2030 Agenda a reality, wide responsibility for SDGs must convert into a solid duty by all partners to actualize the worldwide objectives. Regular monitoring and accountability will be essential to sustain policy focus and funding for the broad and complex SGDs agenda.
International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 2019
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) differ from the MDGs in purpose, concept, and politics. This article focuses process and comparison of the predecessor to the SDGs. The identification of Millennium Development Goals and the follow-on Sustainable Development Goals are referred to here as examples of such policy forming activities. The Millennium Declaration was adopted on 8th September 2000. According to David Hulme, the drafting process attempted to please both the rich countries insisting on their Development Assistance Committee (DAC) prepared list of International Development Goals and everybody else. It argues that the SDGs address several of the key shortcomings of the MDGs and incorporate a broader and more transformative agenda that more adequately reflect the complex challenges of the 21st century and the need for structural reforms in the global economy. The SDGs also reverse the MDG approach to global goal setting and the misplaced belief in the virtues of simplicity, concreteness, and quantification. While the SDGs promise the potential for a more transformative agenda, implementation will depend on continued advocacy on each of the targets to hold authorities to account. The future of global public participation may move beyond invitation (and its deficiencies), to one based on collecting passive information of the global public. It still remains to be seen whether SDGs really demonstrate the longterm public concerns especially with the set of global priorities until 2030.
Making the Sustainable Development Goals Work
The achievement of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals approved by the UN General Assembly in 2015 will depend on whether or not the last goal, "global partnership for sustainable development," will work. The paper suggests that the leading principle for effective global partnership should be the rebalancing of the negotiating power of the different stakeholders. Section I briefly sketches some changes to the notion of development and of cooperation since 1950. Section II describes the process which has led to the SDGs and to the idea of cooperation as a global partnership. Section III focuses on two major economic changes which have taken place since the seventies: economic growth in Asia and the rise of international finance. Both of which have huge implications for the SDGs and for global partnership. Section IV presents three steps which could help to implement "global partnership for development" according to the principle of rebalancing. Developing countries need more policy space especially in their trade and fiscal policies.
Sustainable Development Goals - why do we need them
At the turn of the millennium, the human development on the Earth called for a structured approach. That is when 189 states agreed upon key areas of global cooperation to ensure well-being for all. These key areas then translated into eight Millennium Development Goals, each split into several targets, dealing with poverty, education, gender equality, health and environmental sustainability. For 15 years these have been the ultimate goals of the United Nations member states. There has been progress on many targets, but the environmental conditions have been consistently deteriorating. In response to this, the MDGs and the outcome of the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development have merged into Sustainable Development Goals, which will become the new guideline for the humanity until 2030. This article tries to answer what are the differences between these two sets of goals and what factors make the SDGs a more promising choice than the MDGs used to be.
Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals: the Missing Link , 2019
Despite the seriousness of worldwide social, economic and environmental crises and myriad efforts to counter them through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), too little is being achieved. The greatest challenge is that of implementation in this most complex endeavor involving local, national and international governmental institutions and the public sector, both for-profit and not-for-profit. Research and practice, described in three case studies, demonstrate that an underlying structural foundation either aids or limits the implementation of SDGs in this multi-sector environment. Implementation requires a structure that fosters advancement rather than the all-too common oscillating pattern. This structure consists of a shared desired end result (not focus on a problem) and shared understanding of the actual reality relative to the desired end result to energize and mobilize effective actions. When leaders and actors understand the limitations and opportunities of this model, and apply the lessons, they will be able to achieve greater success in implementing the SDGs.