THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND STARTUPS: DETERMINANTS OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN INDIA (original) (raw)
2021, Amity School of Communication
Abstract
The field of entrepreneurship has witnessed rapid growth over the past four decades, with entrepreneurs being catalysts for change and innovation. In recent years, Indian startups have emerged as a significant force, making strategic decisions crucial for their survival in dynamic markets. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to businesses globally, particularly affecting startups with their inherent vulnerability to external changes. This research explores the determinants of startups in India during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aims to identify key factors influencing startups and understand their interrelationships. By conducting personal interviews with entrepreneurs and subject experts, the research examines positive and negative factors affecting startups, views on government schemes, and the impact of COVID-19 on the entrepreneurial landscape. The methodology employs Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to analyze qualitative data and identify key determinants. Nine critical determinants for startups in India are identified, including changing global scenarios, changing consumer behavior, individual traits, creativity, finance, government policies, business environment, marketing, and human resources. The ISM analysis reveals the interdependence and hierarchy among these determinants. The study emphasizes the need for entrepreneurs to recognize, analyze, and manage these determinants for effective startup design and implementation. The findings contribute to understanding the complex dynamics of startups in the Indian context, offering insights for policymakers, regulators, and entrepreneurs. The research concludes that despite challenges posed by the pandemic, startups in India are adapting by leveraging agile processes and innovative strategies. Recommendations include a focus on strengthening government support, fostering a conducive business environment, and promoting financial accessibility for startups. The study provides a holistic view of startup determinants, paving the way for informed decision-making and sustainable growth in the post-pandemic era.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (10)
- • Drucker, P. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London: Heinemann.
- • Farris, D., & Sage, A. (1975). On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 149-174.
- • Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2008). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India. International Journal of Production Research, 46(24), 6883-6912.
- • Ravi, V., & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1011- 1029.
- • Sage, A. (1977). Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for large- scale systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- • Sharma, H., & Gupta, A. (1995). The objectives of waste management in India: a futures inquiry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 285- 309.
- • Singh, M., Shankar, R., Narain, R., & Agarwal, A. (2003). An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1(1), 28-40.
- • Stokes. (2000). Putting Entrepreneurship into Marketing: The Processes of Entrepreneurial Marketing. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1-16.
- • Stokes, D. (1997). A Lesson in Entrepreneurial Marketing from the Public Sector. Marketing Education Review, 7(3), 47-55.
- • Warfield, J. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,, 1, 81-87.