Suppression of Antiphase Disorder in GaAs Grown on Relaxed GeSi Buffers by Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (original) (raw)
Due to the prohibitively high 4.1% lattice mismatch, direct growth of GaAs on Si invariably leads to very high dislocation densities (> 10 8 /cm 2) which have precluded its use in device applications despite numerous attempts. However, the growth of low threading dislocation density (~ 2 x 10 6 /cm 2) relaxed graded Ge/Ge x Si 1-x /Si heterostructures can bridge the gap between lattice constants by replacing the high mismatch GaAs/Si interface with a low mismatch (< 0.1%) GaAs/Ge interface. Although the lattice mismatch problem is thus eliminated, the heterovalent GaAs/Ge interface remains highly susceptible to antiphase disorder. Since antiphase boundaries (APBs) nucleated at the GaAs/Ge interface act as scattering and non-radiative recombination centers, growth of device quality GaAs on Ge/Ge x Si 1-x /Si demands effective suppression of antiphase disorder. The current work investigates the sublattice location of GaAs on 6° offcut (001) Ge/Ge x Si 1-x /Si substrates as a function of atmospheric pressure metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) growth initiation parameters. Two distinct GaAs phases are observed, one dominant at temperatures > 600 °C and another at temperatures < 500 °C. Incomplete phase transitions during pre-growth thermal cycling account for the appearance of localized bands of antiphase disorder where the polarity of the GaAs film switches. We suspect that background arsenic levels in the MOCVD system are largely responsible for inducing the observed phase transitions. The complete suppression of antiphase disorder under optimized growth conditions is demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Properties and structure of antiphase boundaries in GaAs/Ge solar cells
1996
Antiphase boundaries (APBs) are particularly crystallographically simple but technologically troublesome boundaries that tend to occur in profusion in GaAs grown epitaxially on (100) oriented substrates of Ge or Si. APBs were found to form only in a narrow band near the periphery of square wafers of GaAs/Ge grown by metal organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) to make solar cells for use on space satellites. Bands of AF'Bs have continued to appear in a fraction of the wafers grown over a period of several years. ?he geometry of these bands is presented and the distribution and structure of the APBs within it was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) electron beam induced current (EBIC) and cathodoluminesence (CL). TEM showed that APBs and misfit dislocations were present in the bands in earlier specimens while stacking faults were the only defects in areas outside the bands in more recent specimens. The significance of the formation of APBs only in a limited area and of their relatively large interface recombination velocities are discussed,
Journal of Applied Physics, 2001
The self-annihilation of antiphase boundaries ͑APBs͒ in GaAs epitaxial layers grown by low-pressure metal-organic vapor-phase epitaxy on Ge substrates is studied by several characterization techniques. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy shows that antiphase domain free GaAs growth on Ge was possible due to the proper selection of the growth parameters. The antiphase boundaries annihilate with each other after a thick 3 m layer of GaAs growth on a Ge substrate as observed by scanning electron microscopy studies. Double crystal x-ray diffraction data shows a slight compression of GaAs on Ge, and the full width at half maximum decreases with increasing growth temperatures. This confirms that the APBs annihilate inside the GaAs epitaxial films. Low temperature photoluminescence measurements confirm the self-annihilation of the APBs at low temperature growth and the generation of APBs at higher growth temperatures. II. EXPERIMENT
Misfit dislocations and antiphase domain boundaries in GaAs/Si interface
Journal of Applied Physics, 1994
The interaction of the antiphase boundaries that are formed at the early stage of growth with the interfacial misfit dislocations is studied by transmission electron microscopy using contrast criteria. Experimental analysis has shown that the shifting of the misfit dislocation families, by half of their periodicity, is due to their intersection with antiphase boundaries emanating from demisteps on the Si substrate. The observed discontinuity of dislocation lines is attributed to dynamical contrast conditions. The antiphase boundaries do not interrupt the continuity of the network of dislocations. The dichromatic theory of interfacial defects is applied in order to illustrate the geometrical features of the pattern. The disymmetrization mechanism of the pattern obeys the principle of symmetry compensation. A symmetry analysis of the GaAs/Si interface justifies the agreement of the observations with the structural model.
Structural investigation of MOVPE-grown GaAs on Ge by x-ray techniques
The selection of appropriate characterization methodologies is vital for analyzing and comprehending the sources of defects and their influence on the properties of heteroepitaxially grown III-V layers. In this work, we investigate the structural properties of GaAs layers grown by metal-organic vapour phase epitaxy on Ge substrates-(1 0 0) with 6 • offset towards 1 1 1 -under various growth conditions. Synchrotron x-ray topography is employed to investigate the nature of extended linear defects formed in GaAs epilayers. Other x-ray techniques, such as reciprocal space mapping and triple axis ω-scans of (0 0 l)-reflections (l = 2, 4, 6), are used to quantify the degree of relaxation and presence of antiphase domains (APDs) in the GaAs crystals. The surface roughness is found to be closely related to the size of APDs formed at the GaAs/Ge heterointerface, as confirmed by x-ray diffraction (XRD), as well as atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.