Lexical Constructions: Paradigms and Periphrastic Expression (original) (raw)

Abstract

“… an inflected word's association with its morphosyntactic feature specifications is logically prior to the spelling out of its inflectional markings, since it is this very association that determines the sequence of operations by which those markings are introduced; the realizational ...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (32)

  1. Ackerman, F. 2000. Permian morphosyntax: a view from the lexicon. Ms. UC San Diego.
  2. Ackerman F. & G. Webelhuth. 1998. A Theory of Predicates. CSLI Publications.
  3. Ackerman F. & P. LeSourd. 1997. Toward a lexical representation of phrasal predicates In A. Alsina, et.al. eds. Complex Predicates. CSLI Publications.
  4. Anderson. S. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press. Aronoff. M. 1994. Morphology by Itself. MIT Press.
  5. Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. State University of New York Press.
  6. Blevins, J. 2000. Lexemic stems in Western Germanic. Ms. Cambridge University.
  7. Booij, G. 2000. The diachrony of complex predicates in the West Germanic languages. Grant Proposal funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research.
  8. Börjars, K. N. Vincent, and C. Chapman. 1997. Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection: a feature-based account. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 155-180.
  9. Bresnan & Mchombo 1995. The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.2, 181-254.
  10. Csucs, S. 1998. Udmurt. In D. Abondolo ed. The Uralic Languages. Routledge.
  11. Csucs, S. 1990. Chrestomathia Votiacica. Tank`nyvkiad\. Budapest. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. Cohesion in English. Longman.
  12. KeresztJs, L. 1990. Chrestomathia Morduinica. Tank`nyvkiad\. Budapest. Koenig, J-P. 1999. Lexical Relations. CSLI Publications.
  13. Matthews, P.H. 1993. Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Mitchell, E. 1993. Morphological evidence for syntactic structure: the Finno-Ugric languages and English. PhD. dissertation, Cornell University.
  15. NiZo.
  16. M. E. 1997. Split inflection and the architecture of grammar. Ms. Stanford University.
  17. Orgun, O. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology with special attention to Opimality Theory. PhD. dissertation, UC Berkeley.
  18. Papakyriacou, A. Aspektuelle Verben als komplexe Prädikate. Ms. Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
  19. Riehemann, S. 2000. Type-Based Derivational Morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 49-77.
  20. Salminen, Tapani. 1997. Tundra Nenets inflection. Suomalias-Ugrilainen Seura. Helsinki. Serebrennikov, V. A. 1964. Osnovye linii razvitija padeÙnoj I glagolnoj sistem v uralskix jazykax. Moscow.
  21. Serebrennikov, V. A. 1963. Istoriûeskaja morfologia Permskix jazykovi. Akademii Nauk.
  22. Serebrennikov, V. A. 1960. Kategorii vremeni i vida v finno-ugorskix jazykax permskoj I volÙkoj Grup. Moscow.
  23. Spencer, A. 2000. The word and paradigm model of morphosyntax. Ms. University of Essex.
  24. Spencer, A. and Sadler, L. 2000. Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. Ms. University of Essex.
  25. I would like to express appreciation to the following colleagues and friends for critical comments and help on drafts of this talk: Chris Barker, Eric Bakoviü, Jim Blevins, Mark Gawron, Andy Kehler, Yuki Kuroda, John Moore, Sharon Rose, Andy Spencer, Tapani Salminen, Gert Webelhuth.
  26. Stump. G. to appear. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Stump, G. 1993. Rules of referral. Language 69.3:449-479.
  28. Suihkonen, P. 1995. Udmurt-English-Finnish Dictionary with basic grammar of Udmurt Suomalias-Ugrilainen Seura. Helsinki.
  29. Suihkonen, P. 1990. Korpustustutkimus keilitypolgiassa sovellettuna Udmurtin. Suomalias- Ugrilainen Seura, Helsinki.
  30. Teplja»ina, T. & Lytkin, V. 1976. Permiskie jazyki. In Maitinksaja, K. et.al. eds. Osnovy Finno-Ugorskogo Jazykoznanie. Moscow.
  31. Vainikka 1989. Deriving syntactic representations in Finnish. PhD. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  32. Zwicky, A. 1990. Systematic versus accidental phonological identity. In F. Plank. ed. Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Mouton de Gruyter. 113-131.