Disappointment and awkwardness as ugly feelings. Humanitarian affect in a "Global East" (original) (raw)
Related papers
This paper explores how the boundary between humanitarianism and politics was reproduced in the everyday life in a Bosnia and Herzegovina town. It addresses the use of (post)Yugoslav ideas about humaneness as an apolitical core surrounded by layers of socio-political identities in the course of humanitarian actions. The paper suggests that the depoliticization of humanitarian actions allowed people to distance themselves from the hegemonic understanding of politics as interest-oriented management of ethno-national groups. Those who needed humanitarian help relied on depoliticizing discourses of humaneness to assert their (political) claims to survival and wellbeing in the context marked by the dominance of ethno-nationalist rhetoric.
American Ethnologist, 2016
In 2002, Bosnia and Herzegovina was the site of massive housing-reconstruction projects run by international aid organizations as part of a plan to move refugees back to their prewar homes. Alongside the usual technical tasks of such projects, aid workers spent considerable time and effort establishing and stabilizing the categorical distinction between things humanitarian and things political. Analysis of these efforts by one aid organization reveals the often-overlooked social and cultural work necessary to maintain a humanitarian field of operation, demonstrating that the humanitarian status of aid projects is never more than provisionally settled. This unstable, provisional nature of humanitarian action constitutes an underexplored dynamic shaping and limiting international responses to suffering and need.
This paper focuses on the local perceptions of the effects of humanitarian aid, conceptualised as a specific realm of global interconnectedness. As an aspect of global moral and political order, humanitarian aid has multiple concrete implications on the developments on the ground – from saving bare life to redefining hierarchies of power and effecting, with uncertain outcomes, the existent local socio-cultural orders. My empirical focus is Bosnia-Hercegovina, a country that, due to the four-year war in the 1990s, attracted one of the largest humanitarian operations of that decade, involving all most significant international organisa- tions. Based on fifteen interviews conducted in 2013-14 with people who lived in Sarajevo in the course of the 1990s war, this paper suggests that war events are by no means ‘forgotten’ but have a staying effect on the perceptions of multiple hierarchies, local and global, that people have been immersed in because of living in Bosnia-Hercegovina. Three fields of concern emerge as important from the emic point of view, namely (i) the negotiation of the position of a generic ’other’ in the global hierarchy of peace and conflict; (ii) the negotiation of the locally embedded socio-cultural order; (iii) the resistance to the negotiation of the moral order. These fields of concern indicate the local perceptions of and the modes of acting within the shifting hierarchies, here analysed with regard to their material enactments and in relation to the inter- sected spatial, socio-cultural, and moral frameworks.
Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 2014
Through an ethnographic focus on humanitarne akcije in Bosnia and Herzegovina – a local form of raising monetary donations to people who need medical treatments abroad – this paper explores humanitarianism and its understandings of life. Ethnographically tracking the course of a humanitarna akcija organised in one Bosnian town, this paper makes two related points. First, it ethnographically demonstrates that lives of the ‘helpers’ and ‘helped’ in humanitarne akcije were understood as immersed in the intense talk and gossip of the town and as exposed to the sociopolitical environment troubled in the same way. Comparing this understanding of life with the international humanitarianism, this paper suggests that the notion of ‘bare life’ in international humanitarian projects in emergencies may be the product of the separation of infrastructures, which enable and manage lives of the ‘savers’ and ‘saved’. Second, those who needed help through humanitarne akcije strongly criticised the lack of organised health care and social security in Bosnia and Herzegovina that pushed them to initiate humanitarne akcije. They criticised less how other people perceived them (the terms of their sociocultural recognition) and more the shrinking public health-care insurance, unavailability of medical treatments, unequal allocation of medicines, tissues and organs, and so forth (the unjust redistribution of resources). Their dissatisfactions imply that humanitarianism as an industry of aid can be criticised for failing to intervene in the global regimes of unequal redistribution of resources in a transformative way.
Humanitarian Relations: Emotion and the Limits of Critique
Critical Literacy 7:1, 2013
This paper provides a critical analysis of the Radi-Aid “Africa for Norway” project in order to identify a “humanitarian relation” that informs development agency marketing, as well as global education initiatives. Taking Vanessa Andreotti’s Heads Up critical literacy tool as a starting point, the paper addresses three related questions that we must be attentive to in developing critical practices of engaging with humanitarian discourse: 1) How do our social positions and attendant perspectives shape our analysis? 2) How do approaches that focus on critique fail to address the appeal of development marketing as a practice of benevolence? and 3) How can structural violence be effectively represented? While the Radi-Aid project seeks to challenge the negative stereotypes of Africa that circulate in Europe and North America, I argue that it ultimately reaffirms a humanitarian relation. The problem, I conclude, is how to unpack and undo this relation, not just in intellectual terms – the delineation of the relationships of inequality that produce suffering – but in the terms of how that relation is felt as a sense of purpose and status for the Western-situated humanitarian.
The Narratives of post-Cold War Geopolitics; The Geopolitical Narrative of ‘Humanitarianism’
The Narratives of post-Cold War Geopolitics; The Geopolitical Narrative of ‘Humanitarianism’, 2021
In this essay, I will be talking about the formation of new geopolitical imaginations in the period after the end of the Cold War. This I will do on the hand of the following research question; “How have representations of ‘chaos’ and ‘crisis’ structured post-Cold War geopolitical visions? In your answer, please engage with at least one specific geopolitical vision or ‘scribe’.” I think that this question is extremely relevant due to the fact that it offers us the opportunity to contemplate how our current “narrative” understanding came about in the post-Cold War period through the “chaos” of vertigo. Thereby I also hope to shed some light upon the spatial dimension of connectivity that was an important factor in this creation of a new “narrative”. In the process of answering this question, I will be taking a “discursive” approach centered on “narrative”, thereby methodically arguing about the research question. To be structural I have subdivided this essay into three paragraphs of discussion, having written and handled this middle part I plan to repeat the most important findings in my conclusion before finally giving an answer to the initial question. In the first paragraph, I will give an understanding of discourse and the influences of “chaos” and “crisis” in their subsequent structuring of possibly “hegemonic” post-Cold War “narratives”. As for my second chapter, I will continue by explaining the discursive reality of the post-Cold War period as influenced by the feeling of “vertigo” and the “narrative” attempts to make sense of this new era. In the last paragraph before the conclusion, I intend to give examples of influential “scribes” and their geopolitical “narrative” visions. In this essay, I will be taking on the subject of humanitarianism by exploring its potency and looking into the subsequent “narrative” paradigms of humanitarian reason to find out what kind of actions and visions they support. The main source of literature that supports this subject, will be of the author Didier Fassin with his book "Humanitarian Reason, A Moral History of the Present". I will be taking on this topic on the hand of the following research question; “Didier Fassin (2012) argues that “humanitarianism is the most potent political and geopolitical force of our world”. Discuss, with reference to at least one specific example, how that which Fassin refers to as ‘humanitarian reason’ structures contemporary international interventions and geopolitical visions?” Although humanitarianism is of great importance to how we picture our contemporary world there is little attention to such a banal practice that shapes our everyday lives. Therefore there are a lot of misunderstandings in regards to our conception of depicted morality and the deeper meaning behind the actions taken in its name. To successfully answer such an intricate question it is important that I take a structural approach, I will do this by subdividing the middle part into three paragraphs, followed by a subsequent conclusion in which the most important matters are repeated before a final answer is given. In my first paragraph, I will be taking on the reason behind the dominance of humanitarianism by focusing on its discursive qualities as the raison d'etre behind its potent force. As for the second paragraph I will continue with exploring Fassin's concept of humanitarian reason so as to find out about its “narrative” workings and the societal paradigm of morality it is built upon. Having done this I hope to give concrete examples of how Fassin perceives the moral structuring of contemporary geopolitical visions and military interventions on the basis of humanitarian reason in the third paragraph, before coming to the last part of my discussion and conclusion.
Wounded Words in a Wounded World : Opportunities for Mission in Central and Eastern Europe Today.
MISSION STUDIES, 2020
The goal of this paper is both descriptive and prescriptive. The European sub-region called Central and Eastern Europe is understood and analyzed mostly through social scientific theories and models which have a Western European or North American origin. The region is often observed from the outside, and many interpretations of regional transformation are based on codes and categories of these external perspectives, which I will call heteropoiesis. I try to argue for an autopoietic approach from the opposite direction, from the inside. In my approach, I focus, first of all, on the historical and contemporary social experiences of the societies of the region. After authoring many theoretical and analytical works on it, I have come to believe that the key characteristic of the region is its wounded collective identity. The main narrative in the region is backward looking and nostalgic, also characterized by a feeling of victimhood and revenge feelings. Nationalism and xenophobia in the region are consequences of this traumatized self-understanding. To understand Central and Eastern Europe one must understand the wounds of history and the role of the trauma-centered narratives of today.
Victims of Humanitarianism: Identity in the Politics of Humanitarian Aid
Humanitarian assistance in the 21 st century has been largely defined as a global attempt to rectify large-scale issues and crises around the modern world, primarily in regions of conflict, development, and disaster. The worldwide explosive surge of humanitarian aid organizations has been underpinned by geopolitical and global phenomena that have helped drive and expand their efforts. In order to engage in these initiatives, international aid organizations (IAOs) and state actors have become involved in cross-border discourses that have reshaped the identities of aid recipients and helped form the identities of donors. The practice of identity construction and reconstruction has resulted in a ripple effect that has touched every actor and participant in acts of humanitarian assistance and intervention. This paper identifies the rise of IAOs, those practices which have been employed to mold an other's identity, and the effects of those actions on aid recipients and aid organizations. I find that discursive and representational practices have had direct and indirect consequences on the distribution, reception, and efficacy of aid. I recommend that a more comprehensive approach be taken whereby IAOs are more sensitive in the administrative process to cultural context and become increasingly prominent actors in the resolution of disputes and deadly conflicts. 1 Alfredo is a graduating junior studying political science, business administration, and Modern Standard Arabic at the University of Florida. I would like to thank Oumar Baa for his guidance in helping me write this paper.
Moving the Social, 2017
Bruno Cabanes: The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism 1918 – 1924, Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, vii + 390 pp., ISBN: 978-1-107-60483-4. Jay Winter / Antoine Prost: Rene Cassin and Human Rights: From the Great War to the Universal Declaration, Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, xxiii + 376 pp., ISBN: 978-1-107-65570-6. Marian Moser Jones: The American Red Cross from Clara Barton to the New Deal, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013, xxviii + 365 pp., ISBN: 978-1-4214-0738-8. Alex Wright: Cataloguing the World: Paul Otlet and the Birth of the Information Age, Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press, 2014, 350 pp., ISBN: 978-0-19-993141-5.