A comparison of two methods of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol (original) (raw)

Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study

John W Bolnga

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of Two Dosing Regimens of Misoprostol in Labour Induction: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Adu Appiah-kubi

2023

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of labor with 50 and 100 μg of misoprostol: comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes

ozsoy ozsoy

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial

Pamela Tropper

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

Maternal and neonatal outcome after the use of low dose sublingual 25 µg misoprostol for labour induction in women with term pregnancy

Anupam Kapur

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction or Labour

Varsha Deshmukh

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of Labor Using One Dose versus Multiple Doses of Misoprostol: RCT

Hisham Harb

The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Vaginal and Oral Doses of Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Postdated Pregnancies

Dr Shailaja Pinjala

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Oral and Vaginal Administration of Low-dose Misoprostol for Labor Induction

Randhir Puri

Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term

Peter Danielian

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol

Feza Burak

International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol

Edson Feitosa

Reproductive health, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative study of efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol in induction of labour when used in equal doses

Swathi Bhat

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Oral (20 Μg 2 Hourly) Versus Vaginal (25 Μg 6 Hourly) Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancies

Komail Malik

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Administration of 400 μg of misoprostol to augment routine active management of the third stage of labor

Leanne Brady

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction

Kelly Bennett

Obstetrics and gynecology, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of 100 µg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial

Saipin Pongsatha

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Two Dosage Regimens of Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term

Rubina Sohail

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil

Taynna Costa

Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour

SHASHWAT JANI

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

RIZA MADAZLI

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

The misoprostol third stage of labour study: a randomised controlled comparison between orally administered misoprostol and standard management

Hazem حازم El-Refaey الرفاعي

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Misoprostol use for labor induction in developing countries: a prospective study in Guinea

Hady Baldé

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in term obstetric patients for obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Dr rajendra Shitole

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial

Cheryl Nikodem

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right