Racial Segregation and Disparities in Health Care Delivery: Conceptual Model and Empirical Assessment (original) (raw)
Related papers
Differences in ambulatory care fragmentation by race
BMC Health Services Research
Background More fragmented ambulatory care (i.e., care spread across many providers without a dominant provider) has been associated with more subsequent healthcare utilization (such as more tests, procedures, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) than less fragmented ambulatory care. It is not known if race and socioeconomic status are associated with fragmented ambulatory care. Methods We conducted a longitudinal analysis of data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, using the REGARDS baseline visit plus the first year of follow-up. We included participants ≥65 years old, who had linked fee-for-service Medicare claims, and ≥ 4 ambulatory visits in the first year of follow-up. We used Tobit regression to determine the associations between race, annual household income, and educational attainment at baseline and fragmentation score in the subsequent year (as measured with the reversed Bice-Boxerman Index). Covariates included ...
Racial Disparities in Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
Background: Variation in the quality of ambulatory care may be a key factor in explaining disparities in health, and these disparities have large cost implications. Purpose: This study identifıed differences in hospitalization rates for elderly African-American and white Marylanders for eight ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs). It assessed the relative contribution of race to disparities in preventable hospitalizations after controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors as well as underlying prevalence. It also estimated the excess cost associated with these disparities. Methods: Using prevention quality indicator specifıcations from the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality applied to 2006 Medicare claims data, eight ACSC hospitalization measures were developed for 569,896 Maryland Medicare benefıciaries. The analysis was conducted in 2008. A Poisson regression model identifıed race, age, gender, and income as factors associated with differences in ACSC hospitalization rates. Excess costs were estimated from excess hospitalizations of African Americans and the median cost per admission. Results: African Americans had signifıcantly higher rates of ACSC hospitalizations than whites for fıve of eight conditions after controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Excess costs from disparities in quality ranged from 8million(heartfailure)to8 million (heart failure) to 8million(heartfailure)to38,000 (urinary tract infection). Conclusions: Race may be a key predictor of preventable hospitalizations for some ACSCs. Racial disparities in these hospitalizations represent excess costs to Medicare. Because ACSC admissions are potentially preventable with optimal ambulatory care, improving care for minority populations may reduce disparities and lower hospital costs.
Examining racial and ethnic disparities in site of usual source of care
2007
Little is known about why minorities have a lower propensity to use private doctors' offices for their usual source of care than non-Hispanic whites. This study used the 2001 Commonwealth Fund's Health Care Quality Survey of adults to determine if this disparity is due to racial and ethnic differences in attitudes about health and healthcare, and perceptions of racial and ethnic discriminotLon in healthcare. We found that race and ethnic disparities at the site of the usual source of care persisted even after controlling for individuals' attitudes about health and healthcare, Ond their perceptions about racial and ethnic discrimination in healthcare. We found that the impact of attitudes and perceptions did vary by subgroups. These factors were important for Asians' site of usual source of care but had little impact on African Americans' site of usual of care. However, despite their differential impact by race and ethnicity, attitudes and perceptions were not the source of observed disparities in site of care. Therefore, in addition to focusing on provider-patient relationships, perhaps future research and policymakers should focus on system-level factors to explain and increase minority use of care in private physicians' offices.
Site of Medical Care: Do Racial and Ethnic Differences Persist?
Prior to the 1960s, Americans generally obtained health care in racially segregated facilities or from health providers of their own race or ethnicity. Racial, geographic, and economic factors influenced where minority Americans could get their health care. Minority Americans, who were disproportionately low income, relied on a combination of sources of care, such as public hospitals and private charity care, because they were unable to afford the cost of a private doctor. Even middle-income minority Americans largely relied upon racially segregated sources of care because these were the only options available to them.' In the past four decades, substantial progress has been made in reducing differences in the major sources of health care used by whites and blacks, as well as other racial/ethnic minority groups. Nonetheless, striking racial/ethnic disparities in health care use and health outcomes persist. While these disparities are well documented, 2 factors underlying these differences are not well understood. The most frequently advanced explanations for current health care disparities focus on the characteristics of the patient (e.g., economic conditions or preferences) or the individual provider (e.g., competence or biases). However, it is conceivable that differences in the primary sources of care used by white patients and minority patients might explain some variations in the content of care. Structural or institutional factors-patient-provider relationships, referral
Racial disparity in access to cardiac intensive care over 20 years
Ethnicity & Health, 2011
Objectives-The purposes of this article are: (1) to systematically examine racial disparities in access to and use of cardiac care units (CCUs) in acute-care hospitals; and (2) to assess racial differences in post-hospital mortality following CCU stays. Design-Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I: Epidemiologic Follow-up Study of adults aged 25 and older at baseline are analyzed to track CCU use and survival after hospitalization over 20 years (N=4227). Estimates are derived from Cox proportional-hazards models with time-dependent covariates and from negative binomial and tobit regression analyses. All analyses adjust for disease severity, hospitalization history, and resources. Results-Black adults were less likely than White adults to be admitted to a CCU, even after adjusting for morbidities, health behaviors, previous hospitalization experience, and socioeconomic status. Comparing Black and White adults admitted to CCUs, Black adults spent fewer days and a smaller proportion of their hospital stay in CCUs. Black adults also had fewer CCU stays over the 20-year period and were more likely to die post-discharge, although the latter result was mediated by disease severity. Conclusions-Higher morbidity, lower admission rates, fewer stays, and shorter stays reveal that racial inequality is far-reaching and exists even in such highly-specialized units as CCUs. The fact that Black individuals' greater post-discharge mortality was mediated by disease severity illustrated that even among high-risk individuals, the accumulation of morbidity factors (beyond cardiac problems) is a salient concern. Overall findings demonstrate that the accumulation of disadvantage for Black adults is not confined to discretionary medical measures, but also exists in critical care for serious health problems.
Medical Care, 2018
Background: The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) disproportionately penalizes hospitals serving minority communities. The National Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine has recommended that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) consider adjusting for social risk factors in their risk adjustment methodology. This study examines the association between the racial and ethnic composition of a hospital market and the impact of other social risk factors on the probability of a hospital being penalized under the HRRP. Research Methods and Data: This study analyzes data from CMS, the American Hospital Association, and the American Community Survey for 3168 hospitals from 2013 to 2017. We used logistic regression models to estimate the association between the penalty status under HRRP and the racial and ethnic composition of a hospital market, and explored whether this association was moderated by other social risk factors. Results: Our results indicate th...
The International journal of health planning and management, 2018
The shift from a fee-for-service payment to a value-based payment scheme, sparked by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, introduced pay-for-performance programs such Hospital Value Based Purchasing. Previous inquiry has not considered how local community factors may affect hospital system performance. This study investigated the association between local health performance and minority population in a hospital referral region (HRR). The primary objective was to ascertain whether community diversity levels are significantly associated to local health performance guided by the ecological model. Secondary data analysis collected from the 2016 American Hospital Association, Area Health Resource File, Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Local Health System Performance, and the Dartmouth Atlas HRR dataset was used. Our primary findings show that the more diverse a HRR is, the more likely it is to be associated with lower ranking for access and affordability prevention and treatment...