Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities (original) (raw)
Related papers
Stakeholder effectiveness in natural resource management
Key findings: Countries that are rich in natural resources, both renewable resources such as forests and fisheries, and non-renewable resources such as oil and minerals, have not produced more positive development outcomes than non-resource rich countries. To improve development outcomes and avert several types of harmful effects – often grouped together and termed the ‘resource curse’ – there have been a number of initiatives to improve resource governance. This report provides a brief overview of the available literature which examines and evaluates these governance initiatives, as well as the literature which explores stakeholders, their incentives and other enabling factors which can lead to the governance of natural resources for positive developmental outcomes.
Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2001
A chieving outcomes on the ground is crucial to sustainable natural resource management. Stakeholder involvement is not only a central tenet of sustainable management, it also contributes to outcomes through engendering commitment. This article explores, through three natural resource sectors in Australia, the elements of such involvement contributing to commitment and hence outcomes. The activities of three advisorylconsultative groups from the protected area, agricultural and mining sectors provided the case studies. It is evident from these caseS that perceptions of fairness, identifying a planning process as the 'place to be' and realising mutual benefits were the key elements. Natural reSource managers and opinion leaders can foster these elements by building partnerships, managing impressions and allowing suffiCient time for planning and collaboration.
Friend or Foe? Developing Partnerships in Natural Resource Governance A Global Stakeholder Analysis
Increasing demand for extractive resources, volatile markets and protectionist endeavours are currently heightening a well-known challenge of the developing world: Countries that possess significant amounts of natural resource deposits on average achieve lower development success in economic as well as in political terms. Research on this so called ‘resource curse’ stresses that effective governance is a key to achieving broad-based development from resource extraction. Consequently, more and more development actors – donor countries and their agents as well as NGOs and numerous newly created multi-stakeholder initiatives – are now focusing their attention on governance of the extractive sector. This publication is a condensed version of a study prepared for the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). The primary goal of this study was to map the growing field of actors working on development-related questions of natural resource governance. It also aimed to identify potential partners for GIZ from the universe of stakeholders. The study provides a conceptual framework for identifying partnership possibilities between stakeholders in the field of natural resource governance and applies the framework to a selected number of actors. The study’s scope is limited to stakeholders that are active on a global scale and to nonrenewable natural resources (oil, gas, and mining). It distinguishes four major groups of stakeholders: state actors, business actors, civil society actors, and multi-stakeholder initiatives.
Natural resource project / conflict management : stakeholders doing "class" analysis
2002
Beyond the technological fix Though poorly developed from a methodological standpoint, stakeholder analysis (SA) now belongs to the long list of virtues and catchwords reigning over the field of development. Much to its credit the method travels well across disciplinary and theoretical boundaries. It is so eclectic as to stretch across the political spectrum and fit in with most of what it encounters, be it informed by participatory methos or not (Burgoyne 1994: 205, Grimble and Wellard 1997: 182). SA is currently used in fields ranging from political science to policy development and international relations. The concept and related methodology have made significant inroads into poverty reduction studies and applied research pertaining to issues of sustainable livelihood, communitybased natural resource and conflict management (Ramírez 1999). It is also part of World Bank thinking on participation methodology since about 1993 (MacArthur 1997a: 5). The origins of SA, however, belong to the history of business and managerial science. This is reflected in the term "stakeholder" itself, apparently first recorded in 1708, to mean a bet or a deposit. The word now refers to anyone significantly affecting or affected by someone else's decision-making activity. Economic theory centered on notions of stakeholder relations goes back to the beginnings of industrialism and is embedded in ideals of 19 th century cooperative movement and mutuality (Clarke and Clegg 1998: 295). Stakeholder theory reappears in business and This work is used with the permission of Jacques M. Chevalier.
Governing natural resources for effectiveness, equity and sustainability: what matters?
The governance of natural resources – such as fisheries, forests and grazing land – often fails to deliver adequately on sustainable use, justice and improved livelihoods. Decision-making structures and processes determine the management of resources and who benefits from them. How can governance approaches become more effective and fair to enable improved sustainability and livelihoods over time?